Wandering Off Topic

[sadie]

So which Christian B were we originally talking about?.  And how many people on this forum have abused his human rights?  Not me, obviously.  Or Wolters as far as I can see.

Nor me.

[Mr Gray]

A prosecutor wno says someone is guilty without a trial and conviction is breaching the European Convention on Human Rights. It's nothing to do with defamation or libel.

So why is he not taking action if its so clear cut....perhaps thats what wolters wants him to do...if so well done wolters

[Vertigo Swirl]

A prosecutor wno says someone is guilty without a trial and conviction is breaching the European Convention on Human Rights. It's nothing to do with defamation or libel.

Did he say he was guilty or did he say that it was his opinion that he was guilty?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So why is he not taking action if its so clear cut....perhaps thats what wolters wants him to do...if so well done wolters

A question I also asked earlier today which was ignored.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As per sceptic logic the killer of Bobbi-Anne McLeod, Cody Ackland, jailed today for 31 years for her abduction and murder cannot be guilty as he had no previous criminal convictions of any kind.

Please never let us hear again that a rapist / paedophile could not become a child abductor and murderer on the basis that they had no previous history of such crimes.

[Wonderfulspam]

As per sceptic logic the killer of Bobbi-Anne McLeod, Cody Ackland, jailed today for 31 years for her abduction and murder cannot be guilty as he had no previous criminal convictions of any kind.

Please never let us hear again that a rapist / paedophile could not become a child abductor and murderer on the basis that they had no previous history of such crimes.

The McCanns have no criminal history either......

[Brietta]

I am still struggling with that.  But Amaral is a washed out old has been who never was anything else.

And Brueckner has got no chance against Wolters or The BKA, although I very much doubt he would even try.  Brueckner would have to drop himself in the doodoo in the process because he has No Alibi.

I am incredulous that it is possible for sceptics to grant him and his illogical conclusions the time of day.

[Wonderfulspam]

I am still struggling with that.  But Amaral is a washed out old has been who never was anything else.

And Brueckner has got no chance against Wolters or The BKA, although I very much doubt he would even try.  Brueckner would have to drop himself in the doodoo in the process because he has No Alibi.

What does Brueckner need an alibi for exactly?

Is it for the abduction he isn't accused of, or the murder he isn't accused of either?

[G-Unit]

As per sceptic logic the killer of Bobbi-Anne McLeod, Cody Ackland, jailed today for 31 years for her abduction and murder cannot be guilty as he had no previous criminal convictions of any kind.

Please never let us hear again that a rapist / paedophile could not become a child abductor and murderer on the basis that they had no previous history of such crimes.

I don't think anyone here has ever expressed that view. I may have heard it being used in support of the McCann arguidos though.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't think anyone here has ever expressed that view. I may have heard it being used in support of the McCann arguidos though.

you really haven’t been paying attention then.

[Vertigo Swirl]

One example:

“Rapists and abusers don't normally commit murder.  This is the basic difficulty with Bruckner, he might fit some boxes but he certainly doesn't have the profile of a killer”.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Another example:

“Boxes ticked except for the main one that Bruckner had no known prior for child trafficking. In other words, for him to be guilty he would have had to have done something completely out of character and never done it twice.  Just doesn't add up imo, a bit like Amaral's theories”.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Another example

Does Brückner tick the boxes in your view?

“All except the murderer box. He had/has no previous in this area. He also had no motive.”

[Eleanor]

Spot on Elli.

The man who first said his name is Brueckner is the one who violated his Human Rights.

Now who was that? 

Not apparently that important.  But then no one is actually telling<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<;

[Eleanor]

I am incredulous that it is possible for sceptics to grant him and his illogical conclusions the time of day.

May I say that I pay no attention to this alleged rubbish.  But I might if I have to.