Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

Now if Wolters were to say his evidence is the dog alerts...................................

I think the only dogs which will feature in this case will be the ones Brueckner is suing about re his alleged ill treatment of them and the one whose carcass was found with its head sticking out above ground with some of Brueckner's paedophile hoard buried under it.

[Brietta]

They're not evidence though, so that's a non starter, but Wolters didn't want to deny that they found anything in Brueckner's van, but he denied there was anything physical or forensic, so, reading between the lines, I reckon dogs alerted to in the back of the VW.

The little girls' bathing costumes are going to take a wee bit if explaining away.

[Mr Gray]

I've never encountered a case where the crime and the criminal have been publicly identified without any charges being brought or any evidence being offered. I can't share your faith in a man who was prepared to breach his suspect's human rights in that way. Strong evidence leads to charges and a trial, not to public accusations of guilt imo.

I've got far mor respect for Wolters. At least he's honest... Not like Amaral and the PJ who leaked lies to the press to publicly accuse the mccanns

[sadie]

What is that Fulcher guy getting paid for if he is allowing every tomdickorharry to pick up on alleged breaches to his client's human rights while he has done nothing.
Wonder why that is?

I'm wondering if he, Fulcher,  welcomes comment, especially unfair comment because that is Brueckners 'get-out-of-jail' card.  Maybe they will attempt the 'Tried by Media' plea?  Maybe it will be successful ?    Even, maybe, it was all planned like this beforehand ?

Is this why Amaral interceded?   Was he paid to do it?   To get all the rumours going.

Anyone who bothered to read my early posts will know that I felt that CB was a patsy.   
Not a Pasty for the Mccann side, but a Patsy for the perps side.

To create a 'Cloud' to protect the perps by taking the 'eye' off them and simultaniously have Madeleine pronounced dead.  So the Perps are safe for ever, cos with a 'dead' Madeleine, no reason to go on searching

just my wonderings again.


Only my thoughts, but what has gone on has been mighty strange

[Wonderfulspam]

The little girls' bathing costumes are going to take a wee bit if explaining away.

Why?

Is he being charged with theft from washing lines or something?

[Wonderfulspam]

I've got far mor respect for Wolters. At least he's honest... Not like Amaral and the PJ who leaked lies to the press to publicly accuse the mccanns

How do you actually know that he's honest, though?

I suppose you'd just have to take his word for it really.

[G-Unit]

How do you actually know that he's honest, though?

I suppose you'd just have to take his word for it really.

I expect Wolters thinks/hopes the evidence he has is concrete. He's going to look silly if it isn't. One way of reading the situation at the moment is the resounding silence from the Met suggests a giant step back from them. The arguido status conferred on CB by the Portuguese could be seen as them reminding the Germans that they have jurisdiction. Who knows?

[Mr Gray]

I expect Wolters thinks/hopes the evidence he has is concrete. He's going to look silly if it isn't. One way of reading the situation at the moment is the resounding silence from the Met suggests a giant step back from them. The arguido status conferred on CB by the Portuguese could be seen as them reminding the Germans that they have jurisdiction. Who knows?

Giant step back by the met.. Because they realise the Germans have solved it

[Brietta]

I expect Wolters thinks/hopes the evidence he has is concrete. He's going to look silly if it isn't. One way of reading the situation at the moment is the resounding silence from the Met suggests a giant step back from them. The arguido status conferred on CB by the Portuguese could be seen as them reminding the Germans that they have jurisdiction. Who knows?

They did have jurisdiction in rape case No2 but it seems they abrogated their responsibility on that one and allowed it to be timed out by statute.
The Germans were able to take it to trial and get justice for the victim.

They also had jurisdiction in rape case No1 but it seems they abrogated their responsibility on that one too and also allowed that one to be timed out by statute.
It is to be hoped that the Germans have enough evidence to take that one to trial too and get justice for the victim.

Perhaps someone in authority might tip the wink to the Portuguese Judicial Police and remind them of their role in protecting women and children in their jurisdiction before someone has to do it for them.
If they had, perhaps they could have found enough evidence back in 2007 to make Brueckner an arguido then had they just kept knocking his door until he answered it.

[Wonderfulspam]

Giant step back by the met.. Because they realise the Germans have solved it

We'll know if OG shut down this year, that will mean Wolters has definitely solved it so they're not needed anymore, either that or they're leaving the Germans to waste their own Euros on the futile endeavour.

Though, obviously, if OG don't shut down, that will mean Wolters is still making real progress on the case, or something or other, & charges are imminent.

Just depends what you care to imagine really, in the absence of evidence, which is a point I seem to remember making again & again, but, no one cares about evidence here, claims are an equal substitute for anything tangible, as ever it were in the abduction of Madeleine McCann.

[Wonderfulspam]

They did have jurisdiction in rape case No2 but it seems they abrogated their responsibility on that one and allowed it to be timed out by statute.
The Germans were able to take it to trial and get justice for the victim.

They also had jurisdiction in rape case No1 but it seems they abrogated their responsibility on that one too and also allowed that one to be timed out by statute.
It is to be hoped that the Germans have enough evidence to take that one to trial too and get justice for the victim.

Perhaps someone in authority might tip the wink to the Portuguese Judicial Police and remind them of their role in protecting women and children in their jurisdiction before someone has to do it for them.
If they had, perhaps they could have found enough evidence back in 2007 to make Brueckner an arguido then had they just kept knocking his door until he answered it.

Yeah, we have absolutely no issues with our treatment of women & girls, police incompetence, lack of successful prosecutions for rapes & we've certainly never had a copper falsely arrest, rape & murder some poor young woman in our green & pleasant utopia.

What a backwards country Portugal is.

[Wonderfulspam]

It's probably worth remembering too that the police had no evidence against Brueckner in 2007, unless anyone knows any different, but, maybe the PJ should have had the foresight to realise Brueckner would be confessing to Busching in 2008, & then keeping it to himself for a further 9 years.

If SY & Wolters had been involved from the beginning they'd have prevented Maddie from being abducted in the first place, that's how good they are.

[G-Unit]

Giant step back by the met.. Because they realise the Germans have solved it

As I said, the answer could be quite different. The fact is we just don't know what any of them think; except Wolters who has spent two years telling us what he thinks, but not how he formed his opinion.

[Mr Gray]

As I said, the answer could be quite different. The fact is we just don't know what any of them think; except Wolters who has spent two years telling us what he thinks, but not how he formed his opinion.

Yes he has.. He's formed his opinion from the evidence he has.. And he says if we, saw the evidence we would agree with him

[G-Unit]

Yes he has.. He's formed his opinion from the evidence he has.. And he says if we, saw the evidence we would agree with him

How arrogant. Especially from a man who clearly demonstrated his lack of understanding of the mobile phone 'evidence'.