Wolters thought the phone was CB's but he wanted the person who made the phone call to confirm they spoke to him, so he wasn't 100% sure, was he?
Every fact corroborated by another fact forms another piece of indirect evidence providing another jigsaw piece wich makes up the full picture.
All the police need to follow this line of inquiry is Brueckner's verified phone number possession of which will lead on to another line of inquiry and so on and so on.
I reckon there is little information remaining from these investigative opportunities which present day investigators don't know about. Back in the day even calls from two phone boxes which at that time in history would perhaps have been a more realistic solution than burner phones.
The receptionist who made Madeleine McCann's abduction possible
He had Brueckner in his phone book and told him that "Maddie's" family dined every day in the same place and at the same time.
PACO RODRÍGUEZ@PacoRlarazon
CREATED09-06-2020
According to the newspaper "Correio da Manha", investigators managed to identify the receptionist who provided the information and the opportunity to Brueckner to enter the apartment and take Madeleine away. In fact, in the Ocean Club employee's phone book was the suspect's phone.
What is not yet known is whether the receptionist's collaboration was accidental or was a collaborator who makes him an accomplice.
The main suspect (Brueckner) worked as a waiter and it is still unknown if he did it at the Ocean Club, but he could know that there was a guestbook and he consulted it or knew the staff for having worked with them on occasion or simply got the information by approaching the restaurant and talking to the employee.https://www.larazon.es/internacional/20200609/zt3i2u7mpfc2nbn5ji6atuslia.html I think by now the BKA will know as much as they require to know about Brueckner's phone contacts. Particularly one lasting half an hour pinging off the closest mast which happened to be in Praia da Luz and shortly prior to Madeleine's abduction.
