Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3151814 times)

0 Members and 60 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12915 on: June 10, 2022, 11:17:21 PM »
Exactly.  The simple amd most logical explanation is that she was abducted. The apartment was ground floor, it was unlocked, it would have take less than 5 minutes to enter and remove her, no need for any convoluted story telling or getting your mates to tell lies on your behalf, no improbable deadly fall off a sofa after an even more improbable Calpol overdose, no carrying corpses around town, no staging open windows, or mopping up spilt blood from the tiled floor, no frozen cadavers in the boot being moved 23 days later, no death days before the disappearance with substitute Madeleines, just a straightforward terrible stranger abduction.

I was referring to conspirators who target elderly British women's computers.  @)(++(*
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12916 on: June 10, 2022, 11:25:59 PM »
I was referring to conspirators who target elderly British women's computers.  @)(++(*
And I was referring to the sentence in your post “ there's no huge conspiracy around Madeleine's disappearance”.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12917 on: June 11, 2022, 05:59:29 AM »
And I was referring to the sentence in your post “ there's no huge conspiracy around Madeleine's disappearance”.

Aye, pick a phrase to run with and ignore the rest, as per usual.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Myster

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12918 on: June 11, 2022, 07:02:34 AM »
Agreed. There was a slight uptick in new members around the time of Wolters concrete revelations, but mostly it's us same, what ten or twelve, life termers, that end up just tearing lumps out of each other because we've ran out of things to talk about.

It's scary to think us select few have all been here trolling each other for the past 15 years (10 in my case). I was young & sexy when I joined the forum, now I'm old & bald and wisened.
But bald men are still sexy...................... to lonely trichologists.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12919 on: June 11, 2022, 07:15:12 AM »
Aye, pick a phrase to run with and ignore the rest, as per usual.
OK so the rest of you post included the phrases “in my opinion” and “I suspect the solution is much more mundane than some people think.”. so let’s address these startling revelations too.  Yes, you post was your opinion, as was mine, I get that.  The solution to Madeleine’s disappearance is more mundane than a conspiracy?  Totally agree, that’s what I said in my post.  So just what is it about your post that you feel hasn’t been explored fully? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12920 on: June 11, 2022, 07:17:41 AM »
But bald men are still sexy...................... to lonely trichologists.

I was 12 when I realised hair wasn't everything;

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12921 on: June 11, 2022, 08:41:05 AM »
Aye, pick a phrase to run with and ignore the rest, as per usual.
You have totally contradicted yourself.  You have claimed there is a conspiracy not to investigate the McCanns.. You infer there's a coonsiracyy to implicate CB.... Seems like you think there's a lot of conspiring going on

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12922 on: June 11, 2022, 09:14:49 AM »
You have totally contradicted yourself.  You have claimed there is a conspiracy not to investigate the McCanns.. You infer there's a coonsiracyy to implicate CB.... Seems like you think there's a lot of conspiring going on

I have pointed out that there was, according to Colin Sutton, a decision not to investigate the McCanns, not a conspiracy. I don't think there has been a conspiracy to implicate CB; a decision by his mates to do so, and a determination by the authorities to prove them right, that's all. No overarching conspiracies at all, and definitely nothing so earth shattering that elderly British ladies might need to be threatened.  @)(++(*
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12923 on: June 11, 2022, 09:16:53 AM »
You have totally contradicted yourself.  You have claimed there is a conspiracy not to investigate the McCanns.. You infer there's a coonsiracyy to implicate CB.... Seems like you think there's a lot of conspiring going on
Quite.  It seems G-Unit believes the explanation for Madeleine's disappearance was a mundane ol' accidental death covered up by the family and friends which involved carrying the uncovered corpse through town in front of numerous witnesses, and yet getting away with said crime for 15 years thanks to friends in high places.  Just a common or garden mundane explanation like that.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12924 on: June 11, 2022, 09:19:01 AM »
I have pointed out that there was, according to Colin Sutton, a decision not to investigate the McCanns, not a conspiracy. I don't think there has been a conspiracy to implicate CB; a decision by his mates to do so, and a determination by the authorities to prove them right, that's all. No overarching conspiracies at all, and definitely nothing so earth shattering that elderly British ladies might need to be threatened.  @)(++(*
A decision to look the other way in a serious crime by the highest of authorities a.k.a. a cover up / conspiracy.   Thanks for confirming your beliefs.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12925 on: June 11, 2022, 09:20:48 AM »
I have pointed out that there was, according to Colin Sutton, a decision not to investigate the McCanns, not a conspiracy. I don't think there has been a conspiracy to implicate CB; a decision by his mates to do so, and a determination by the authorities to prove them right, that's all. No overarching conspiracies at all, and definitely nothing so earth shattering that elderly British ladies might need to be threatened.  @)(++(*
A determination to prove a bunch of no mark low-lifes right by the German authorities because....?  Let's here your reasoned explanation for THAT one!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12926 on: June 11, 2022, 09:21:20 AM »
I have pointed out that there was, according to Colin Sutton, a decision not to investigate the McCanns, not a conspiracy. I don't think there has been a conspiracy to implicate CB; a decision by his mates to do so, and a determination by the authorities to prove them right, that's all. No overarching conspiracies at all, and definitely nothing so earth shattering that elderly British ladies might need to be threatened.  @)(++(*

You are wriggling badly.. A decision not to investigate the McCanns by two or more people would meet the definition of a conspiracy... It seems you don't even realise that. Carry on contradictibg yourself.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12927 on: June 11, 2022, 09:36:38 AM »
Agreed. There was a slight uptick in new members around the time of Wolters concrete revelations, but mostly it's us same, what ten or twelve, life termers, that end up just tearing lumps out of each other because we've ran out of things to talk about.

It's scary to think us select few have all been here trolling each other for the past 15 years (10 in my case). I was young & sexy when I joined the forum, now I'm old & bald and wisened.

Ten or twelve, thats pushing it , half a dozen at best, its obvious the case no longer hold an appeal, more important things, like cost of petrol,cost of luxuries like a loaf of bread, etc .................................
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12928 on: June 11, 2022, 09:59:50 AM »
Quite.  It seems G-Unit believes the explanation for Madeleine's disappearance was a mundane ol' accidental death covered up by the family and friends which involved carrying the uncovered corpse through town in front of numerous witnesses, and yet getting away with said crime for 15 years thanks to friends in high places.  Just a common or garden mundane explanation like that.

It's obvious that you don't pay attention to what I say, preferring to suggest something completely different. Do you think Sadie's correct to suspect she's the target of a conspiracy to silence her?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #12929 on: June 11, 2022, 10:13:12 AM »
It's obvious that you don't pay attention to what I say, preferring to suggest something completely different. Do you think Sadie's correct to suspect she's the target of a conspiracy to silence her?
No I do not but that is not what you said.  You said that in your opinion there was no huge conspiracy around Madeleine's disappearance - yet you are quite obviously reluctant to dismiss all sorts of ridiculous conspiracies just so long as the parents involvement is central to them.  I know this because I DO pay attention to what you write. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".