Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3151728 times)

0 Members and 43 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13020 on: June 13, 2022, 09:51:32 AM »
Ah, yes I recall now.  You believe CB may have stumbled across a child’s corpse im some random hiding place and decided to photograph it and keep quiet about it rather than going to the police and getting fame and fortune for being the guy who  found the most famous missing child in the world. As I said, a very fertile imagination/rocks in head delete as applicable.

Using that as a benchmark, why didn't CB's bestest mates dob him in it way back in 2008 when the supposed confession was heard over a pint .
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13021 on: June 13, 2022, 10:01:00 AM »
Madeleine McCann is probably the most famous missing child in the world but that doesn't mean she's the most important one. Her fame arose for other reasons.

She's the most famous missing child in the world... Nothing to do with importance... Every missing child is important

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13022 on: June 13, 2022, 10:02:20 AM »
Using that as a benchmark, why didn't CB's bestest mates dob him in it way back in 2008 when the supposed confession was heard over a pint .
Maybe because they were his "bestest" mates and thought he was bullshitting?  Had they seen the rape video at this point?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13023 on: June 13, 2022, 10:06:06 AM »
Maybe because they were his "bestest" mates and thought he was bullshitting?  Had they seen the rape video at this point?

He was. That much is obvious.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13024 on: June 13, 2022, 10:22:50 AM »
Maybe because they were his "bestest" mates and thought he was bullshitting?  Had they seen the rape video at this point?

They saw the video (allegedly) when they raided his house when he was in jail for stealing diesel.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13025 on: June 13, 2022, 10:34:45 AM »
It's not simply believing things are true because Wolters says so.  What some don't seem to understand is it's a matter of looking at the situation in it's entirety.... not simplistically

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13026 on: June 13, 2022, 10:36:48 AM »
They saw the video (allegedly) when they raided his house when he was in jail for stealing diesel.

How would they know the rape video existed.. We know because the victim said so

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13027 on: June 13, 2022, 10:39:08 AM »
They saw the video (allegedly) when they raided his house when he was in jail for stealing diesel.

Do you understand that the only reason CB was caught for the rape was that the description given by his friends matched the details of the reported rape precisely.. Perhaps you think that was just a coincidence

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13028 on: June 13, 2022, 10:45:13 AM »
Madeleine McCann is probably the most famous missing child in the world but that doesn't mean she's the most important one. Her fame arose for other reasons.
Firstly, I never claimed she was "the most important" one. Secondly, who is the most important missing child and why aren't you spending all your time trying to solve the mystery of their disappearance instead of the "not as important" Madeleine McCann? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13029 on: June 13, 2022, 10:45:55 AM »
It's not simply believing things are true because Wolters says so.  What some don't seem to understand is it's a matter of looking at the situation in it's entirety.... not simplistically

Yeah, if you ignore the 3 times moving bedroom door, meaning the abductor spent about half hour in the apartment, plus the complete incredulity of Kate's curtains, then Brueckner's confession becomes credible.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13030 on: June 13, 2022, 10:47:25 AM »
They saw the video (allegedly) when they raided his house when he was in jail for stealing diesel.

They didn't find the Maddie video though, but Wolters has, just have faith.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13031 on: June 13, 2022, 10:55:05 AM »
Yeah, if you ignore the 3 times moving bedroom door, meaning the abductor spent about half hour in the apartment, plus the complete incredulity of Kate's curtains, then Brueckner's confession becomes credible.

LOL

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13032 on: June 13, 2022, 11:10:03 AM »
Yeah, the three times moving door and the whooshing curtains, I bet they give the Met, the BKA and the PJ sleepless nights.   *%87
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13033 on: June 13, 2022, 11:14:54 AM »
Yeah, the three times moving door and the whooshing curtains, I bet they give the Met, the BKA and the PJ sleepless nights.   *%87

Brueckner isn't accused of 'the abduction'. Just the murder apparently.
Probably because there's no evidence of abduction & only Brueckner's weak as piss murder confession.
That would explain why he's never being charged with either abduction, or murder, or both.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13034 on: June 13, 2022, 11:19:58 AM »

Maybe the 3 investigative forces believe there was a different abductor, who sold Maddie to Brueckner, so he could murder her, then go back to selling weed & abstaining from anymore murder thereafter.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club