Wandering Off Topic

[Wonderfulspam]

attack and sneer, attack and sneer, it's all you have left in this case, keep it up, I know it makes you feel better.

Thanks, if you insist, I will.

How's the case against Brueckner going?

[G-Unit]

You mean you are not aware..

The details of the rape from the video were given to the PJ.
They looked back through their records of reported rapes and found one that matched... The one that had a recovered pubic hair.  I would think you know the rest

Were they?

[G-Unit]

attack and sneer, attack and sneer, it's all you have left in this case, keep it up, I know it makes you feel better.

What's your excuse for attacking and sneering?

[Mr Gray]

Were they?

you obviously arent up to date.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What's your excuse for attacking and sneering?

I don't need an excuse.  I have no problem in understanding why three police forces are treating Madeleine's disappearance as an abduction.  You do however, and that leaves you with only attacking and sneering when faced with this uncomfortable (for you) truth.

[Wonderfulspam]

I don't need an excuse.  I have no problem in understanding why three police forces are treating Madeleine's disappearance as an abduction.  You do however, and that leaves you with only attacking and sneering when faced with this uncomfortable (for you) truth.

I have no difficulty in understanding why they aren't getting anywhere, your side do however, which is why there is the need for the imaginary photo & now an imaginary diary entry about Maddie, being somehow inadmissible as evidence.
Still, let's hope they find an imaginary witness to help bolster the case. Oh wait no, we had that one the other week already, when someone must have come forward saying they saw Brueckner standing outside the front of 5a.

[G-Unit]

you obviously arent up to date.

I haven't seen the details you appear to have access to. Please share your source(s)

[Mr Gray]

I haven't seen the details you appear to have access to. Please share your source(s)

cant be bothered...draw what inference you wish...doesnt matter in the slightest.  how e;se would the PJ have pinpointed that particualar rape...where the matched hair was

[G-Unit]

I have no difficulty in understanding why they aren't getting anywhere, your side do however, which is why there is the need for the imaginary photo & now an imaginary diary entry about Maddie, being somehow inadmissible as evidence.
Still, let's hope they find an imaginary witness to help bolster the case. Oh wait no, we had that one the other week already, when someone must have come forward saying they saw Brueckner standing outside the front of 5a.

I was referring to the attacks and sneers you regularly aim at other members. I was quoting someone else; an uninvolved ex policeman who clearly doesn't idolise the Met like some do.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I was referring to the attacks and sneers you regularly aim at other members. I was quoting someone else; an uninvolved ex policeman who clearly doesn't idolise the Met like some do.

LOL, thanks for acknowledging Wonderfulspam’s attacks and sneers, they were a perfect example of what I was talking about.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I was referring to the attacks and sneers you regularly aim at other members. I was quoting someone else; an uninvolved ex policeman who clearly doesn't idolise the Met like some do.

Do you think the Met are incompetent and stupid then?  What about the BKA?  Incompetent or corrupt, or something else?  How about the PJ?  Easily led?  Political interference?   
Which police force would you trust to do the right thing and start investigating parental involvement again?  Or perhaps they are all bent and stupid and perhaps we should leave it to armchair detectives such as yourself, eh?  Never mind that you don’t have access to all the evidence and information pertaining to the case and to CB, you clearly know better than these three rubbish police forces, right? 

[Eleanor]

LOL, thanks for acknowledging Wonderfulspam’s attacks and sneers, they were a perfect example of what I was talking about.

I thought Gunit had put that comment in the wrong place.  LOL.

[Wonderfulspam]

Do you think the Met are incompetent and stupid then?  What about the BKA?  Incompetent or corrupt, or something else?  How about the PJ?  Easily led?  Political interference?   
Which police force would you trust to do the right thing and start investigating parental involvement again?  Or perhaps they are all bent and stupid and perhaps we should leave it to armchair detectives such as yourself, eh?  Never mind that you don’t have access to all the evidence and information pertaining to the case and to CB, you clearly know better than these three rubbish police forces, right?

Get back to us when the concrete evidence 3 police forces have convicts Brueckner, won't you.

[G-Unit]

Do you think the Met are incompetent and stupid then?  What about the BKA?  Incompetent or corrupt, or something else?  How about the PJ?  Easily led?  Political interference?   
Which police force would you trust to do the right thing and start investigating parental involvement again?  Or perhaps they are all bent and stupid and perhaps we should leave it to armchair detectives such as yourself, eh?  Never mind that you don’t have access to all the evidence and information pertaining to the case and to CB, you clearly know better than these three rubbish police forces, right?

Are you sneering at me? All police forces make mistakes at times.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Are you sneering at me? All police forces make mistakes at times.

And here we have a situation where you and your fellow sceptics believe that not one, not two, but THREE police forces in three different countries are all making the same mistake - investigating an abduction.  What are the chances eh?  How do you explain this incredibly bizarre turn of events to yourself?  Come on, you must have given it some thought…or maybe not.