Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's means exactly what it says  CB cannot be placed in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007, so what are the odds he wasn't  involved in an alleged abduction.

I don't know why don't you have a go at calculating them?  So CB cannot be definitively proven to have been in Luz that night.  So does that mean Madeleine was not abducted?  Is that a logical conclusion iyo?

[Wonderfulspam]

Don't expect a straight answer to that one!

How about the total absence of any credible, tangible, reliable or verifiable abduction evidence.

That do?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So you believe that Grange looked into other scenarios? Do you have any evidence that they did? I don't.

Yes.  They reviewed the PJ's case files in their entirety which (in case you have forgotten) were in  large part focussed on the parents.  How do you suppose they reviewed the case files without considering the possibility that the parents might have done it?  Or do you think that they privately believed the parents should be further investigated but were threatened or coerced or otherwise ordered into "looking the other way" by the High Ups?

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes.  They reviewed the PJ's case files in their entirety which (in case you have forgotten) were in  large part focussed on the parents.  How do you suppose they reviewed the case files without considering the possibility that the parents might have done it?  Or do you think that they privately believed the parents should be further investigated but were threatened or coerced or otherwise ordered into "looking the other way" by the High Ups?

She asked for evidence, not speculation.

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes patience,  Wolters said a while back these other crimes would be dealt with first.

Did you hear that from Jon Clarke?

[Wonderfulspam]

so does that mean Madeleine was not abducted?

Oh right, must be a different abductor out there somewhere then, while Wolters chases after the wrong guy.

[Lace]

Another reading of the evidence is that there was no kidnapping, but he wasn't tasked with investigating that.

OG went right back to the beginning  what proof is there that they didn't investigate the McCann's?    I don't believe they didn't go over everything.   They didn't need to interview the McCann's that had already been done,  they saw the statements,  they poured over the evidence and came to their conclusion.   They are experts unlike you and I.

[Wonderfulspam]

OG went right back to the beginning  what proof is there that they didn't investigate the McCann's?    I don't believe they didn't go over everything.   They didn't need to interview the McCann's that had already been done,  they saw the statements,  they poured over the evidence and came to their conclusion.   They are experts unlike you and I.

The twice translated unreliable statements, you mean?

[Lace]

Some have the absolutely ridiculous belief that the McCann's were being protected by the 'establishment'.  What utter BS they were treated like any other  member of the public in Portugal.   Didn't stop them being made arguido's did it?

[G-Unit]

Yes.  They reviewed the PJ's case files in their entirety which (in case you have forgotten) were in  large part focussed on the parents.  How do you suppose they reviewed the case files without considering the possibility that the parents might have done it?  Or do you think that they privately believed the parents should be further investigated but were threatened or coerced or otherwise ordered into "looking the other way" by the High Ups?

When was their remit written?

[G-Unit]

OG went right back to the beginning  what proof is there that they didn't investigate the McCann's?    I don't believe they didn't go over everything.   They didn't need to interview the McCann's that had already been done,  they saw the statements,  they poured over the evidence and came to their conclusion.   They are experts unlike you and I.

Quite. You 'believe' that they investigated the evidence against the McCanns and dismissed it, because you 'believe' that they are experts. You don't know that's what they did.

[barrier]

I don't know why don't you have a go at calculating them?  So CB cannot be definitively proven to have been in Luz that night.  So does that mean Madeleine was not abducted?  Is that a logical conclusion iyo?

My opinion is that Wolters says  CB cannot be placed in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 , so logically he can't be the one who supposedly half inched Madeleine out of 5a . Now if you know of any one else in the frame I'm sure the reader would like to know who it is . Further more Wolters also says there is no forensics into the girls death, with which Wolters agrees with me that person/s unknown took Madeleine out of 5a without leaving a trace to her whereabouts .

[Wonderfulspam]

My opinion is that Wolters says  CB cannot be placed in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 , so logically he can't be the one who supposedly half inched Madeleine out of 5a . Now if you know of any one else in the frame I'm sure the reader would like to know who it is . Further more Wolters also says there is no forensics into the girls death, with which Wolters agrees with me that person/s unknown took Madeleine out of 5a without leaving a trace to her whereabouts .

The other unknown abductor accomplice snatched Maddie, gave her to Brueckner so he could photograph & murder her.
Brueckner's diary entries for that week detail everything, just wait & see.
Shouldn't be much longer now.

[Vertigo Swirl]

When was their remit written?

You don’t ask questions unless you already know the answer so why don’t you tell me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

My opinion is that Wolters says  CB cannot be placed in Luz on the night of 3/05/2007 , so logically he can't be the one who supposedly half inched Madeleine out of 5a . Now if you know of any one else in the frame I'm sure the reader would like to know who it is . Further more Wolters also says there is no forensics into the girls death, with which Wolters agrees with me that person/s unknown took Madeleine out of 5a without leaving a trace to her whereabouts .

Your logic is fk’ed, scuse my French.