Wandering Off Topic

[Lace]

It's always good to have  aback up story just in case... then there is the memory lapsing.

If you had any sense you would have realised that the first statement is a condensed description of what happened.  Later Kate explains in detail.

[Lace]

Or that a friendly loving childless  couple broke into the apartment and stole her to love her and look after her.

oh no wait. Kate forgave the 'paedophiles  who  kidnapped her

erm  um  hang on Kate N Gerry have moved on  they  seemed to have moved on next day by their behavior.

Imagine the horror of Brukner or someone of his ilk grabbing Maddy and doing despicable things and mum n dad are jogging, blogging setting up a business yeah leaves  people feeling sick to the stomach as they did back then...nothing has changed.

Oh you are back with your nasty comments.    Your version of things is just imaginary hate.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I only revisit that when those who deny the facts raise the subject.

The McCanns left their kids alone and went out for dinner.  They checked on them periodically throughout the night.  Them’s the facts IMO.  No doubt in your version of the facts the McCanns abandoned their kids to go and get drunk and probably lied about how often they checked on them, so let’s just agree that there are only opinions, not facts.

[jassi]

It's good to see that the ECHR can move swiftly when faced with a serious case.

[Mr Gray]

Some people can't get over their conviction that all the McCann's troubles were caused by Amaral. The endless discussions of his faults is sooo boring.

Some people can't get over the fact that the McCanns are no longer and never will be suspects in the case

[Wonderfulspam]

Some people can't get over the fact that the McCanns are no longer and never will be suspects in the case

That would explain why the police can't solve it.

[Mr Gray]

That would explain why the police can't solve it.

Good to see you supporting my claim that posting opinion as fact is now acceptable...the case is solved of course

[G-Unit]

If you had any sense you would have realised that the first statement is a condensed description of what happened.  Later Kate explains in detail.

When was her detailed explanation given? Her only other interview (speaking) was on 6th September and they got to 10pm on 3rd May then stopped. Kate never gave a detailed account to the PJ imo.

[Mr Gray]

When was her detailed explanation given? Her only other interview (speaking) was on 6th September and they got to 10pm on 3rd May then stopped. Kate never gave a detailed account to the PJ imo.

so boring

[Eleanor]

so boring

LOL.

[Lace]

When was her detailed explanation given? Her only other interview (speaking) was on 6th September and they got to 10pm on 3rd May then stopped. Kate never gave a detailed account to the PJ imo.

Did the PJ ask for a detailed account?   All they seemed to want is what Kate found when she entered 5a and that is what she told them.

So saying she changed her account is rubbish.

[G-Unit]

Did the PJ ask for a detailed account?   All they seemed to want is what Kate found when she entered 5a and that is what she told them.

So saying she changed her account is rubbish.

I didn't say she did, I said that your claim that she gave a more detailed account was rubbish.

[G-Unit]

so boring

But true, which the post I was responding to wasn't.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I didn't say she did, I said that your claim that she gave a more detailed account was rubbish.

What do you mean by “a more detailed account”.  Do you think the PJ statements (written in the third person, non-verbatim) represent every detail she gave to the police?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I didn't say she did, I said that your claim that she gave a more detailed account was rubbish.

Have you not read Kate’s book?