Wandering Off Topic

[Eleanor]

In order to criticise something you need knowledge of it.  I reject the parental involvement from a position of knowledge
My rejection would not be valid if I didn't look at both sides.  Is that so difficult for you to understand

This is the primary problem.  I looked at everything eventually.  I began in June 2007 when I initially suspected The McCanns, mainly due to my stupidity for being hooked in by The Media.

It didn't take long for me to notice the inverted commas and question marks.  I remain mortally ashamed of my original suspicions.  Just how stupid was I in those days?

No one does themselves any favours by coming to conclusions without thought.  They only demean themselves.

What anyone else on this Forum thinks of my opinion is totally irrelevant to me.

[Mr Gray]

Nice swerve!

Or you are just not bright enough to understand.. Take your pick

[Eleanor]

Nice swerve!

What is it that you do?

[Vertigo Swirl]

What is it that you do?

oh this, in spades.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nice swerve!

Davel got you hook, line and sinker.  Now perhaps you have had a lesson in logic you can apply it to (for example) the question you posed to the forum a few days ago when you gave us the option of choosing who was the liar - Kate or the nanny. 

[barrier]

If you think I'm behind you that's because I've lapped you several times

Tortoise and the Hare old chap .

[barrier]

So the original Conviction is worthless?  I don't think so.

No one said it was, but in relation to what was being written down, clearly the press had CB down for the drug offence before the rape conviction was upheld, best take it up with them.

[Mr Gray]

No one said it was, but in relation to what was being written down, clearly the press had CB down for the drug offence before the rape conviction was upheld, best take it up with them.

the press get a lot wrong. he may have appealed...does that cancel the sentence..no it doesnt

[barrier]

the press get a lot wrong. he may have appealed...does that cancel the sentence..no it doesnt

Who said it did ? you have an issue with the press take it up with them, they all from what one can see wrote as such.

[barrier]

This is the primary problem.  I looked at everything eventually.  I began in June 2007 when I initially suspected The McCanns, mainly due to my stupidity for being hooked in by The Media.

It didn't take long for me to notice the inverted commas and question marks.  I remain mortally ashamed of my original suspicions.  Just how stupid was I in those days?

No one does themselves any favours by coming to conclusions without thought.  They only demean themselves.

What anyone else on this Forum thinks of my opinion is totally irrelevant to me.

Well you want some one to think something of it, or why press send.

[Mr Gray]

Who said it did ? you have an issue with the press take it up with them, they all from what one can see wrote as such.

Im pointing out the press got it wrong.....from what i can see evry paper mentioned the rape apart from Natashs

[Eleanor]

Well you want some one to think something of it, or why press send.

You yourself press Send frequently.

[G-Unit]

This is the primary problem.  I looked at everything eventually.  I began in June 2007 when I initially suspected The McCanns, mainly due to my stupidity for being hooked in by The Media.

It didn't take long for me to notice the inverted commas and question marks.  I remain mortally ashamed of my original suspicions.  Just how stupid was I in those days?

No one does themselves any favours by coming to conclusions without thought.  They only demean themselves.

What anyone else on this Forum thinks of my opinion is totally irrelevant to me.

You're perfectly entitled to your opinions about this case, as are all other members. I'm sure you're not alone in thinking before reaching conclusions either. None of us should worry about other's opinions or feel the need to justify their own.

[Eleanor]

You're perfectly entitled to your opinions about this case, as are all other members. I'm sure you're not alone in thinking before reaching conclusions either. None of us should worry about other's opinions or feel the need to justify their own.

I will justify my own conclusions if I feel so inclined.  Otherwise, what is the point in commenting at all?

Meanwhile, why don't you have another laugh at Sadie?  Is she not entitled to her opinions?

[Vertigo Swirl]

You're perfectly entitled to your opinions about this case, as are all other members. I'm sure you're not alone in thinking before reaching conclusions either. None of us should worry about other's opinions or feel the need to justify their own.

What exactly is the purpose of a chat forum like this if not to challenge each others' opinions on all manner of topics?