Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2270608 times)

0 Members and 64 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13365 on: June 20, 2022, 01:32:32 PM »
Don't know if you ever look at Websleuths, there's a couple of interesting threads there with snippets like he was questioned without being cautioned, that would put the kybosh on any charges .
It will be very sad if Cannan goes to his grave taking his secrets with him. 
« Last Edit: June 21, 2022, 11:43:29 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13366 on: June 20, 2022, 01:40:21 PM »
But you don't know if they did that or not (and certainly in 15 years no one has been able to prove that they did), so the best course of action would be to give them the benefit of the doubt and treat them sypathetically, or if you can't do that shut up.

But it's ok to accuse 'the abductor' (which is basically anyone other than the McCanns)?

Hypocrisy.

Maddie disappeared, until proven otherwise, should be the correct position.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13367 on: June 20, 2022, 01:42:08 PM »
It will be very sad if Canaan goes to his grave taking his secrets with him.

Oh, I see, Canaan isn't entitled to the same presumption as the McCanns.

Yeah, double standards right here.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13368 on: June 20, 2022, 01:54:16 PM »
All anyone has at the moment is suspicion. CB's record isn't evidence that he harmed Madeleine and the McCanns lack of a record isn't evidence that they are blameless.

The lack of evidence against the McCann's is evidence of innocence... That's a fact sceptics seem unable to grasp as you have shown several times


Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13369 on: June 20, 2022, 02:03:46 PM »
The lack of evidence against the McCann's is evidence of innocence... That's a fact sceptics seem unable to grasp as you have shown several times

Same applies for any 'abductor' then.

So, Maddie disappeared, no parental involvement, or abductor either.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13370 on: June 20, 2022, 02:09:13 PM »
All anyone has at the moment is suspicion. CB's record isn't evidence that he harmed Madeleine and the McCanns lack of a record isn't evidence that they are blameless.
No one who matters still harbours suspicion against the McCanns.  They are not considered suspects by the three police forces conducting the investigation into their daughter's disappearance and who have access to ALL the available evidence and information.  Suspicions amongst the less well informed really don't count for much. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13371 on: June 20, 2022, 02:12:42 PM »
No one who matters still harbours suspicion against the McCanns.  They are not considered suspects by the three police forces conducting the investigation into their daughter's disappearance and who have access to ALL the available evidence and information.  Suspicions amongst the less well informed really don't count for much.

Well, the 3 investigative forces with access to ALL the information, still can't prove there ever actually was an abduction, so, their suspicions don't count for much either, in the grand scheme of things.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13372 on: June 20, 2022, 04:02:11 PM »
Well, the 3 investigative forces with access to ALL the information, still can't prove there ever actually was an abduction, so, their suspicions don't count for much either, in the grand scheme of things.

You don't know they can't prove an abduction.. I would say they can

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13373 on: June 20, 2022, 04:03:26 PM »
Same applies for any 'abductor' then.

So, Maddie disappeared, no parental involvement, or abductor either.

Wolters claims evidence of abduction

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13374 on: June 20, 2022, 04:05:55 PM »
Wolters claims evidence of abduction

He doesn't really have any though.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13375 on: June 20, 2022, 04:11:54 PM »
You don't know they can't prove an abduction.. I would say they can

Well, you'd be totally wrong then.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13376 on: June 20, 2022, 04:35:35 PM »
Well, you'd be totally wrong then.

Lol...

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13377 on: June 20, 2022, 04:40:00 PM »
No one who matters still harbours suspicion against the McCanns.  They are not considered suspects by the three police forces conducting the investigation into their daughter's disappearance and who have access to ALL the available evidence and information.  Suspicions amongst the less well informed really don't count for much.

This forum looks at miscarriages of justice, most of which involve the police getting it wrong. It would be interesting if three forces got it wrong, wouldn't it?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13378 on: June 20, 2022, 04:41:45 PM »
Lol...

I know dave, I'm going to look a bit foolish when Wolters whips out the concrete evidence, shouldn't be much longer now.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13379 on: June 20, 2022, 04:44:00 PM »
I know dave, I'm going to look a bit foolish when Wolters whips out the concrete evidence, shouldn't be much longer now.

no you are not going to look a bit foolish...you are going to look very stupid along with many others...9including so called professionals.....and a so called world class cadaver dog