Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2270787 times)

0 Members and 82 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13380 on: June 20, 2022, 04:45:18 PM »
This forum looks at miscarriages of justice, most of which involve the police getting it wrong. It would be interesting if three forces got it wrong, wouldn't it?

Anyone who thinks 3 forces have got it wrong has a very poor understanding of the evidence..imo. we will wait and see.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13381 on: June 20, 2022, 04:49:30 PM »
Anyone who thinks 3 forces have got it wrong has a very poor understanding of the evidence..imo. we will wait and see.

Have they got anything right so far?

They did rule out Tannerman I suppose, they were right to do that, & so were the sceptics.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13382 on: June 20, 2022, 04:53:07 PM »
no you are not going to look a bit foolish...you are going to look very stupid along with many others...9including so called professionals.....and a so called world class cadaver dog

You still aren't letting go of Wolters concrete evidence are you.

Sorry, when does Brueckner's trial start again?

Oh that's right, there isn't going to be one.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13383 on: June 20, 2022, 05:03:09 PM »
You still aren't letting go of Wolters concrete evidence are you.

Sorry, when does Brueckner's trial start again?

Oh that's right, there isn't going to be one.

It's not really worth discussing anything with you because you have a poor grasp of reality... Which I will refer to in future as pgor..

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13384 on: June 20, 2022, 05:06:21 PM »
This forum looks at miscarriages of justice, most of which involve the police getting it wrong. It would be interesting if three forces got it wrong, wouldn't it?
Interesting?!  It would be unprecedented!!  Perhaps you can provide examples of where after many years of investigation 3 police forces came to entirely the wrong conclusion about what sort of crime had been committed?  I bet you can't!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13385 on: June 20, 2022, 05:09:30 PM »
It's not really worth discussing anything with you because you have a poor grasp of reality... Which I will refer to in future as pgor..
Spam and others clutch to the belief that if the investigation fails to bring charges against CB then that must mean Madeleine was not abducted and the parents dunnit.  It is of course entirely illogical but what do you expect from people who think that parental involvement is the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine's disappearance.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline sadie

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13386 on: June 20, 2022, 05:12:14 PM »
This forum looks at miscarriages of justice, most of which involve the police getting it wrong. It would be interesting if three forces got it wrong, wouldn't it?

Please don't include SY.   They are looking for a missing person.   I wonder why they are different from PT PJ and German police ?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13387 on: June 20, 2022, 05:40:26 PM »
Spam and others clutch to the belief that if the investigation fails to bring charges against CB then that must mean Madeleine was not abducted and the parents dunnit.  It is of course entirely illogical but what do you expect from people who think that parental involvement is the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine's disappearance.

Well, if CB isn't convicted, then there wasn't an abduction, since he's the only suspect, against whom ALL the evidence must lead, apparently.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13388 on: June 20, 2022, 05:42:49 PM »
Please don't include SY.   They are looking for a missing person.   I wonder why they are different from PT PJ and German police ?

They are treating it as a missing person case... Because they have no definitive evidence of death... That doesn't mean they think Maddie is still alive

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13389 on: June 20, 2022, 05:44:09 PM »
It's not really worth discussing anything with you because you have a poor grasp of reality... Which I will refer to in future as pgor..

Well, let's have a look at that shall we.

Wolters said he could prove Maddie was murdered, I said no he couldn't, & I was right about that.

So, not a bad grasp on reality from me there really,
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13390 on: June 20, 2022, 05:44:30 PM »
Well, if CB isn't convicted, then there wasn't an abduction, since he's the only suspect, against whom ALL the evidence must lead, apparently.

You're wrong again

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13391 on: June 20, 2022, 05:45:06 PM »
You're wrong again

Nope, Wolters still hasn't proven me wrong.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13392 on: June 20, 2022, 05:46:05 PM »
Well, let's have a look at that shall we.

Wolters said he could prove Maddie was murdered, I said no he couldn't, & I was right about that.

So, not a bad grasp on reality from me there really,

In reality you don't know wolters cannot prove madfie was abducted and murdered

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13393 on: June 20, 2022, 05:47:13 PM »
Nope, Wolters still hasn't proven me wrong.

That does nt mean you are right.. Reality

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #13394 on: June 20, 2022, 05:48:25 PM »
In reality you don't know wolters cannot prove madfie was abducted and murdered

Well, I do, since he can't prove it.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club