Wandering Off Topic

[barrier]

Abducted by her parents or onemof their friends you think?  Get real.

You never know, Ricky Neaves mother was the prime suspect for the boys murder until they closed the case after she was found not guilty, a reopening of a cold case proved otherwise , police later admitting they showed suspect bias.

[barrier]

Lol... Priceless.. Keep em coming

Better than saying its been solved, when the evidence isn't strong enough to support a charge let alone be put before a court of law.

[Mr Gray]

It's the only one he offered.

The fact that he said that does not mean that it was his sole justification for believing Maddie was abducted.
Can you not understand that simple fact

[Vertigo Swirl]

You never know, Ricky Neaves mother was the prime suspect for the boys murder until they closed the case after she was found not guilty, a reopening of a cold case proved otherwise , police later admitting they showed suspect bias.

you are aware that Mark Rowley has stated unequivocally that the parents are not suspects, right?

[Mr Gray]

Better than saying its been solved, when the evidence isn't strong enough to support a charge let alone be put before a court of law.

Total junk..... So you can support that statement with proof.. Lol

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's the only one he offered.

Wrong.  He said they had a number or important leads that lead them to believe she was abducted possibly in a burglary gone wrong.

[G-Unit]

Wrong.  He said they had a number or important leads that lead them to believe she was abducted possibly in a burglary gone wrong.

There were many leads that led nowhere. I was asking what convinced them there was an abduction.

[Mr Gray]

There were many leads that led nowhere. I was asking what convinced them there was an abduction.

The totality of the evidence..

[G-Unit]

The totality of the evidence..

Or their remit.

[barrier]

Wrong.  He said they had a number or important leads that lead them to believe she was abducted possibly in a burglary gone wrong.

Yeah they went in for some cash and came out with a child, how the devil is that a burglary gone wrong.

[barrier]

Total junk..... So you can support that statement with proof.. Lol

The SC never said they had not been cleared. I think you will find the SC will be heavily criticised in my view.  It has a very poor recirdvat the ECHR.
It obviously won't affect thevcade which imo has been solved by the Germans
The mist interesting point is that it has been shown that a favourable verdict could lead to the libel case being reopened in Portugal

For clarity the SC in 2017 said the mccanns were not clesred by the archiving despatch in 2008. They didn't say they had not been cleared.  I think it's quite obvious the despatch was evidence if innocence which the SC refused to accept

[Mr Gray]

Better than saying its been solved, when the evidence isn't strong enough to support a charge let alone be put before a court of law.

You claim the evidence isn't enough to charge.. You state it as a fact... That's junk...your opinion

[barrier]

You claim the evidence isn't enough to charge.. You state it as a fact... That's junk...your opinion

If he hasn't been charged then my statement is fact at this moment in time .

Despite J Canaan being the prime suspect in the Lamplugh case there is not enough to charge , that is fact .

[Mr Gray]

If he hasn't been charged then my statement is fact at this moment in time .

Despite J Canaan being the prime suspect in the Lamplugh case there is not enough to charge , that is fact .

No it isn't.  There may be other  reasons why he hasn't been charged.. Reasons already explained

[Vertigo Swirl]

There were many leads that led nowhere. I was asking what convinced them there was an abduction.

No you claimed their only justification for pursuing the abduction theory was that Madeleine couldn’t have run away and started a new life, and I was pointing out that you were wrong - that Rowley gave other justifications, ie: other strong leads, as he felt they were at the time.