Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2266726 times)

0 Members and 69 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14025 on: September 07, 2022, 08:33:41 PM »
How do you know OG did not knock on his door, out of interest?

Absolutely true…I don’t but I do know that they’ve have known about Brueckner for years.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14026 on: September 07, 2022, 08:57:36 PM »
Absolutely true…I don’t but I do know that they’ve have known about Brueckner for years.
And does that in any way, shape or form excuse the PJ from ruling him out of their investigation on the basis of an unanswered knock on his door in 2007?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14027 on: September 07, 2022, 09:07:35 PM »
She didn’t mention his name specifically (obviously!) Perhaps you need to read back on my posts and we can pick the discussion up again when you’re up to speed.

No, confirm your claim yourself.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14028 on: September 07, 2022, 09:14:49 PM »
And does that in any way, shape or form excuse the PJ from ruling him out of their investigation on the basis of an unanswered knock on his door in 2007?

Was he ruled out or the knock just not followed up?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14029 on: September 07, 2022, 09:18:47 PM »
No, confirm your claim yourself.
I don’t follow orders.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14030 on: September 07, 2022, 09:20:22 PM »
Was he ruled out or the knock just not followed up?
it amounts to the same thing imo.  If the police had not ruled him out why did they make no further effort to trace him and interview him?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14031 on: September 07, 2022, 09:25:23 PM »
it amounts to the same thing imo.  If the police had not ruled him out why did they make no further effort to trace him and interview him?

No it doesn’t. It is absolutely understandable that he may have fallen between the cracks as the PJ were swamped by thousands and thousands if ridiculous sightings.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14032 on: September 07, 2022, 09:48:59 PM »
No it doesn’t. It is absolutely understandable that he may have fallen between the cracks as the PJ were swamped by thousands and thousands if ridiculous sightings.
There were not “thousands and thousands” of sightings in the first month of the investigation, so it’s totally incomprehensible why local paedophiles were not thoroughly investigated and eliminated.  But you’re a PJ apologist so I guess you don’t agree.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14033 on: September 07, 2022, 11:27:35 PM »
There were not “thousands and thousands” of sightings in the first month of the investigation, so it’s totally incomprehensible why local paedophiles were not thoroughly investigated and eliminated.  But you’re a PJ apologist so I guess you don’t agree.

There were thousands and thousands of sightings in the first months and for many months afterwards.

As to being a PJ apologist, that couldn’t be further from the truth. I think the PJ got many things wrong. Whether this worked in the parent’s favour is a discussion for another day.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14034 on: September 07, 2022, 11:42:18 PM »
I don’t follow orders.

Neither do I. Look through your own posts.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14035 on: September 08, 2022, 07:07:39 AM »
Neither do I. Look through your own posts.
I didn’t order you, I suggested.  I also don’t need to look through my own posts, I know what I wrote, it’s all there.  If you want to know what I wrote you just have to read back, it’s not hard.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14036 on: September 08, 2022, 07:13:40 AM »
There were thousands and thousands of sightings in the first months and for many months afterwards.

As to being a PJ apologist, that couldn’t be further from the truth. I think the PJ got many things wrong. Whether this worked in the parent’s favour is a discussion for another day.
A cite for “thousands and thousands of sightings” in the first few weeks of the investigation please.  In any case the vast majority of these were never followed up.  You are a PJ apologist if you believe it is acceptable that they knocked on the door of a paedophile in the locale where a child went missing and gave up when no one comes to the door. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14037 on: September 08, 2022, 09:29:09 AM »
I didn’t order you, I suggested.  I also don’t need to look through my own posts, I know what I wrote, it’s all there.  If you want to know what I wrote you just have to read back, it’s not hard.

I think we both know Kate McCann didn't mention the PJ knocking on CB's door and you didn't post that she did.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14038 on: September 08, 2022, 09:32:25 AM »
I think we both know Kate McCann didn't mention the PJ knocking on CB's door and you didn't post that she did.
I think if you read back on my posts you will see that 1)I said KMC did not mention CB by name and 2) I didn't post that she did (no dispute there!)  Why are you picking a fight over nothing?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #14039 on: September 08, 2022, 10:37:36 AM »
A cite for “thousands and thousands of sightings” in the first few weeks of the investigation please.  In any case the vast majority of these were never followed up.  You are a PJ apologist if you believe it is acceptable that they knocked on the door of a paedophile in the locale where a child went missing and gave up when no one comes to the door.

I’m not sure that I said that it was acceptable but suggested that the legal situation is more complex than you seem to comprehend.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?