Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

Amaral was convicted.

Almeida was convicted.  Amaral was convicted. Everyone knows that.  Denial is merely an example of the duplicity which has hounded Madeleine's case from the word go.

[faithlilly]

Amaral was convicted.

Not of torture.

[Eleanor]

Almeida was convicted.  Amaral was convicted. Everyone knows that.  Denial is merely an example of the duplicity which has hounded Madeleine's case from the word go.

You and I have moved on since then.  Some people never will.

[faithlilly]

Almeida was convicted.  Amaral was convicted. Everyone knows that.  Denial is merely an example of the duplicity which has hounded Madeleine's case from the word go.

Apologies and thank you for the correction. I was merely going from the article printed.

The Met have come under sustained pressure to root out the widespread corruption within it. Where do you think the officers recruited to OG came from and, that being the case, how much faith should we put in the investigation itself?

[faithlilly]

You and I have moved on since then.  Some people never will.

It was Brietta who posted the article. Was Almeida mentioned before then?

[Eleanor]

It was Brietta who posted the article. Was Almeida mentioned before then?

I heard about him a long time ago.

[faithlilly]

I heard about him a long time ago.

You said you and Brietta had moved on where others hadn’t but it was Brietta who mentioned Almeida which kinda suggests that she hasn’t….moved on that is.

[Eleanor]

You said you and Brietta had moved on where others hadn’t but it was Brietta who mentioned Almeida which kinda suggests that she hasn’t….moved on that is.

In reply to a spurious question from Gunit.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Apologies and thank you for the correction. I was merely going from the article printed.

The Met have come under sustained pressure to root out the widespread corruption within it. Where do you think the officers recruited to OG came from and, that being the case, how much faith should we put in the investigation itself?

100%, unless you have any evidence that OG has been compromsed by corruption, bent cops, cover up and conspiracy?

[Brietta]

I heard about him a long time ago.

Unlike others obviously there is nothing wrong with either your long term or short term memory.

From a conversation in 2013
Quote from: ferryman on June 08, 2013, 04:17:23 PM
That is one point you are making.
Another point faith is making is that she implicitly trusts the word of a convicted torture.
And a third point I am making is that the word of a convicted torturer is not to be trusted.
I will make (my) second (the) fourth point: the prosecutors could find no evidence against any of the 3 (former) arguidos.
Reply #263 on: June 08, 2013, 04:30:21 PM Faithlilly
It was you who brought up the subject of Almeida, not I. I was merely perplexed what your post has to do with the fact that the McCanns are quite able to put a positive spin on events, even when they are going against them.
https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1745.msg54393#msg54393

[faithlilly]

In reply to a spurious question from Gunit.

Nonetheless Brietta brought him up…not Gunit or me but Brietta which suggests she hasn’t moved on as you claimed.

[faithlilly]

Unlike others obviously there is nothing wrong with either your long term or short term memory.

From a conversation in 2013
Quote from: ferryman on June 08, 2013, 04:17:23 PM
That is one point you are making.
Another point faith is making is that she implicitly trusts the word of a convicted torture.
And a third point I am making is that the word of a convicted torturer is not to be trusted.
I will make (my) second (the) fourth point: the prosecutors could find no evidence against any of the 3 (former) arguidos.
Reply #263 on: June 08, 2013, 04:30:21 PM Faithlilly
It was you who brought up the subject of Almeida, not I. I was merely perplexed what your post has to do with the fact that the McCanns are quite able to put a positive spin on events, even when they are going against them.
https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1745.msg54393#msg54393

Well there you go….how did that slip my mind.

Still doesn’t alter the point I was making to Eleanor.

[Eleanor]

Nonetheless Brietta brought him up…not Gunit or me but Brietta which suggests she hasn’t moved on as you claimed.

Tis difficult to forget some of the horror stories that came out of Portugal at the time.

Whether or not I or Brietta have moved on in your opinion is irrelevant.  Ground Hog Day is a fact of life in this Case.

[faithlilly]

Tis difficult to forget some of the horror stories that came out of Portugal at the time.

Whether or not I or Brietta have moved on in your opinion is irrelevant.  Ground Hog Day is a fact of life in this Case.

Brietta has demonstrably not moved on but I absolutely agree with your Groundhog Day analogy.

[Eleanor]

Brietta has demonstrably not moved on but I absolutely agree with your Groundhog Day analogy.

In Your Opinion.