Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

Colin Sutton's information about the nature of OG was useful, but when he pontificated about other things his lack of knowledge shows. He said;

"The alarm was raised at 10.15pm, but first officers did not arrive in Praia da Luz until 11pm and the disappearance was not taken seriously enough

“This is an unacceptable delay, regardless of what they thought had happened to Madeleine,” says Colin.

Even if they thought she had innocently wandered off, it should not have taken them 45 minutes to arrive."
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/6-errors-madeleine-mccann-detectives-10272590

If Sutton had read the files he would know that it didn't take the police 45 minutes to arrive, so that criticism isn't relevant.

The 'pick-and-mix' problem which afflicts squirming through the selection process of quotes from a prolific interviewee who very often says the exact opposite of the sceptic mantra they think he adopted makes for amusing reading.

Quite frankly, watching the risible antics as you attempt to adopt the very few utterances from this man acceptable to your prejudices v the myriad of examples where he is in patent disagreement.

Nota Bene
Interviewer  Are there any unsolved cases across the world that you would be interested in tackling?
Colin Sutton  Not now, I am too happy being retired!
But had the Madeline McCann review come my way before retirement I would have stayed to complete that; it is the greatest mystery of our generation, and despite its obvious difficulty I would have been unable to resist the opportunity to try to help solve it.
https://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/article/interview-with-colin-sutton

[Brietta]

It's unbelievable that the bedding was removed and washed.   Thery tested for drugs but they should have tested for skin and hair too using that sticky tape or a vacuum.

At the very least anything which had been in known immediate contact with Madeleine should have been bagged for evidence.

Even if the technology wasn't available at the time advances in forensic science might have made a difference as has happened in many cold cases.

Curtains were retained as was the cover from the other single bed in the room.  So Madeleine's bedding had it been retained would not have presented a storage problem.

[Brietta]

By the time of this video CS had found himself an appreciative audience among the online sceptic community.  I reckon he changed his tune  somewhat to pander to that appreciative (and potentially lucrative) demographic.

I believe Colin Sutton remains active on internet social media with a blog, twitter etc.  I do not believe he has repeated anything which bolsters sceptic paranoia since his initial miscalculation was treated with such ecstasy.

Does his head still adorn a place of honour in another place? or did he join Sandra Felgueiras's decapitation when she got it through to them that she wasn't the sceptic icon they thought she was after all.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I believe Colin Sutton remains active on internet social media with a blog, twitter etc. I do not believe he has repeated anything which bolsters sceptic paranoia since his initial miscalculation was treated with such ecstasy.

Does his head still adorn a place of honour in another place? or did he join Sandra Felgueiras's decapitation when she got it through to them that she wasn't the sceptic icon they thought she was after all.

Probably threatened by the "High-Ups" 

[Brietta]

Probably threatened by the "High-Ups" 

Not so much "threatened" ~ I think a realisation of the cess pit he had inadvertently stumbled into 😒

[Wonderfulspam]

Why are people talking about Colin Sutton when there's concrete evidence against the new prime suspect we could be discussing?

[faithlilly]

He discusses how the media twist what people say to them. At 11.19 he speaks of going to PdL with a newspaper in 2017 and how they misrepresented what he said. Could it have been the article quoted;

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/6-errors-madeleine-mccann-detectives-10272590

Absolutely but no doubt those who disagree will try to besmirch his unblemished reputation.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Absolutely but no doubt those who disagree will try to besmirch his unblemished reputation.

He's just another Rent-A-Gob, wheeled out to pontificate on things that he doesn't have the full picture on.  Very helpful I'm sure.

[jassi]

Absolutely but no doubt those who disagree will try to besmirch his unblemished reputation.

All part  of the game. Innit.

[Vertigo Swirl]

All part  of the game. Innit.

Yes, it’s not as if you or Faithlilly have ever besmirched anyone linked to this case.  Innit.

[faithlilly]

All part  of the game. Innit.

Unfortunately for them Sutton’s professional record for nabbing wrong ‘uns speaks for itself.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Unfortunately for them Sutton’s professional record for nabbing wrong ‘uns speaks for itself.

The Met (ex) officer it’s OK to like (if you’re a sceptic!)   

[Eleanor]

The Met (ex) officer it’s OK to like (if you’re a sceptic!)

Has he nicked The McCanns yet?.  If not why not?

[faithlilly]

Has he nicked The McCanns yet?.  If not why not?

That’s the thing. Sutton, as far as I’m aware, has never said whether he thinks the parents are guilty or innocent. What he has said is that OG was purposely directed away from them.

[Eleanor]

That’s the thing. Sutton, as far as I’m aware, has never said whether he thinks the parents are guilty or innocent. What he has said is that OG was purposely directed away from them.

But he's brilliant.  That shouldn't stop him.