Wandering Off Topic

[Vertigo Swirl]

That’s the thing. Sutton, as far as I’m aware, has never said whether he thinks the parents are guilty or innocent. What he has said is that OG was purposely directed away from them.

I wonder how much he was paid for that interview…?

[Eleanor]

Perhaps Colin Sutton is only any good when he's told what to do.

[faithlilly]

Perhaps Colin Sutton is only any good when he's told what to do.

I think that’s the point…he wasn’t happy being told where to look.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think that’s the point…he wasn’t happy being told where to look.

He wasn’t happy not being offered the job more like.

[Eleanor]

I think that’s the point…he wasn’t happy being told where to look.

He wasn't asked.

[jassi]

Perhaps Colin Sutton is only any good when he's told what to do.

If that were the case he would have fitted well into OG.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Say OG in the course of their reinvestigation into stranger abduction obtained CCTV footage which clearly showed Gerry McCann carrying a small blonde child through the streets at 10pm on the night of the disappearance - is it sceptic belief that the Met would ignore it because it didn’t fit the remit?

[Eleanor]

Manhunt.  Devised by Colin Sutton.  Based on the memoirs of Colin Sutton.

But it might be worth a watch if you take it with a pinch of salt.

[Wonderfulspam]

Say OG in the course of their reinvestigation into stranger abduction obtained CCTV footage which clearly showed Gerry McCann carrying a small blonde child through the streets at 10pm on the night of the disappearance - is it sceptic belief that the Met would ignore it because it didn’t fit the remit?

That simply wouldn't happen, because it's logistically impossible for the McCanns to be involved. So I'm reliably informed.

[G-Unit]

Say OG in the course of their reinvestigation into stranger abduction obtained CCTV footage which clearly showed Gerry McCann carrying a small blonde child through the streets at 10pm on the night of the disappearance - is it sceptic belief that the Met would ignore it because it didn’t fit the remit?

There was no such evidence to find, so that question's a bit fanciful.

[faithlilly]

He wasn't asked.

He was being considered.

[Wonderfulspam]

Besides, wouldn't Gerry be 'parading' this child through the streets at 10pm? He couldn't just 'carry' her. He'd have to be 'parading' her, I'm usually told.

[Vertigo Swirl]

There was no such evidence to find, so that question's a bit fanciful.

That's beside the point, but of course you are choosing to deflect from the point as it's easier to do.  Had the Met uncovered ANY evidence that clearly pointed at Gerry McCann hiding his daughter's body would the Met simply have ignored it in your view? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

He was being considered.

According to who?  Him?  I wonder why he was overlooked then....?  Don't tellme.... too good at his job and would have had those dastardly mcCanns banged up in a jiffy.  Yep, it's a cover up and conspiracy all right!!!

[G-Unit]

That's beside the point, but of course you are choosing to deflect from the point as it's easier to do.  Had the Met uncovered ANY evidence that clearly pointed at Gerry McCann hiding his daughter's body would the Met simply have ignored it in your view?

There was no evidence giving the kind of clear indication you are speculating about, so you're inventing a scenario which couldn't have happened.