Wandering Off Topic

[Eleanor]

There was no evidence giving the kind of clear indication you are speculating about, so you're inventing a scenario which couldn't have happened.

You never do this.  Of Course?

[Vertigo Swirl]

There was no evidence giving the kind of clear indication you are speculating about, so you're inventing a scenario which couldn't have happened.

LOL.  A great get out for you to avoid answering the question.  Given that you believe the Met should have started at the beginning and reinvestigated EVERY theory including the "parents dunnit" theory then it would follow that you think there may have been evidence to find that would help to build a case against them, therefore you must concede that you don't know whether or not such evidence exists to be found.   So let me ask again - do you think that should such clear evidence have been uncovered in the course of their investigation into stranger abduction that the Met would have ignored it as it didn't fit the brief?  Are you going to address this point at last or are you simply going to fudge it once again?  My money's on the latter.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If there was literally no evidence to be found to point to parental involvement as G-Unit has mooted, then why would she have the Met waste time and resources starting at the beginning and reinvestigating the McCanns? 

[Wonderfulspam]

LOL.  A great get out for you to avoid answering the question.  Given that you believe the Met should have started at the beginning and reinvestigated EVERY theory including the "parents dunnit" theory then it would follow that you think there may have been evidence to find that would help to build a case against them, therefore you must concede that you don't know whether or not such evidence exists to be found.   So let me ask again - do you think that should such clear evidence have been uncovered in the course of their investigation into stranger abduction that the Met would have ignored it as it didn't fit the brief?  Are you going to address this point at last or are you simply going to fudge it once again?  My money's on the latter.

If Spams theory, what evidence would you expect the police to be able to find?

[G-Unit]

If there was literally no evidence to be found to point to parental involvement as G-Unit has mooted, then why would she have the Met waste time and resources starting at the beginning and reinvestigating the McCanns?

I don't think there is 'literally no evidence', just that your unrealistic suggestions weren't believable or helpful. There wasn't one piece of evidence that could be found and which showed exactly what had happened.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I don't think there is 'literally no evidence', just that your unrealistic suggestions weren't believable or helpful. There wasn't one piece of evidence that could be found and which showed exactly what had happened.

Again, how do you know this?  Again had the Met uncovered ANY evidence that clearly pointed at Gerry McCann hiding his daughter's body would they simply have ignored it in your view?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Here's another scenario for you to ponder - the Met puts out the appeal on Crimewatch and receives a confidential call from a close personal friend of Kate's telling them that Kate had confided in her that she thinks Gerry harmed Madeleine and may actually have hidden the body without telling her.  Would the police have ignored such a phone call on the basis that it didn't fit with the remit?   Would the police have said to the caller "no, sorry not interested, don't believe you, Madeleine was abducted by a stranger and we can't interview you as the remit won't allow it"?

[Eleanor]

Here's another scenario for you to ponder - the Met puts out the appeal on Crimewatch and receives a confidential call from a close personal friend of Kate's telling them that Kate had confided in her that she thinks Gerry harmed Madeleine and may actually have hidden the body without telling her.  Would the police have ignored such a phone call on the basis that it didn't fit with the remit?   Would the police have said to the caller "no, sorry not interested, don't believe you, Madeleine was abducted by a stranger and we can't interview you as the remit won't allow it"?

This whole idea is ridiculous but there isn't much point in arguing about it as Sceptics just won't have it.

No one actually knows if The McCanns or The Tapas Crew were questioned.

[Vertigo Swirl]

This whole idea is ridiculous but there isn't much point in arguing about it as Sceptics just won't have it.

No one actually knows if The McCanns or The Tapas Crew were questioned.

It's amazing how a whole conspiracy theory can evolve around the use of just one word in a paragraph. 

[Eleanor]

It's amazing how a whole conspiracy theory can evolve around the use of just one word in a paragraph.

Whatever it is they think they are doing, it obviously isn't working.

[G-Unit]

Whatever it is they think they are doing, it obviously isn't working.

Do you mean OG? It isn't working as yet, that's for sure.

[Eleanor]

Do you mean OG? It isn't working as yet, that's for sure.

No, I didn't mean Operation Grange.  I don't have a problem with them.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you mean OG? It isn't working as yet, that's for sure.

What do you know about it?   They may well have helped solve a vicious rape and several cases of child abuse actually so something must be working.

[Eleanor]

What do you know about it?   They may well have helped solve a vicious rape and several cases of child abuse actually so something must be working.

Gunit knew very well that I didn't mean Operation Grange.  She's just up to her silly tricks again.  Why she does this is her problem.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Gunit knew very well that I didn't mean Operation Grange.  She's just up to her silly tricks again.  Why she does this is her problem.

Deflecting as usual, so she is.