Wandering Off Topic

[faithlilly]

Whatever it is they think they are doing, it obviously isn't working.

But they’ve only had 11 years….give them time.

[Vertigo Swirl]

But they’ve only had 11 years….give them time.

Sceptics have had fifteen years of hating, hurting, harassing and other nasty things beginning with aitch and where has it got them?  Absolutely nowhere.  Saddoes.

[faithlilly]

No, I didn't mean Operation Grange.  I don't have a problem with them.

If I was a believer and hoped Madeleine was alive I’d be furious with OG for taking so long to rescue her.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If I was a believer and hoped Madeleine was alive I’d be furious with OG for taking so long to rescue her.

What a childish comment.

[G-Unit]

Sceptics have had fifteen years of hating, hurting, harassing and other nasty things beginning with aitch and where has it got them?  Absolutely nowhere.  Saddoes.

Fifteen years of reminding people that the case isn't as simple and straitforward as it's sometimes portrayed. The McCanns were not cleared by the Portuguese Judiciary, despite them claiming they were. Their human rights weren't breached, despite them claiming they were. Abduction isn't the only crime which should be considered, despite the McCanns claiming that's what happened.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Fifteen years of reminding people that the case isn't as simple and straitforward as it's sometimes portrayed. The McCanns were not cleared by the Portuguese Judiciary, despite them claiming they were. Their human rights weren't breached, despite them claiming they were. Abduction isn't the only crime which should be considered, despite the McCanns claiming that's what happened.

And all this “reminding” has achieved what exactly?  The McCanns are leading respectable professional and personal lives, they have not been under investigation for 14 years, the police both here and abroad investigating the case seem convinced Madeleine was abducted by a stranger and yet here you (collectively) still are trying your damnedest to convince anyone who crosses your path otherwise.  Why?

[Eleanor]

And all this “reminding” has achieved what exactly?  The McCanns are leading respectable professional and personal lives, they have not been under investigation for 14 years, the police both here and abroad investigating the case seem convinced Madeleine was abducted by a stranger and yet here you (collectively) still are trying your damnedest to convince anyone who crosses your path otherwise.  Why?

That's what I meant.  It isn't working after fifteen years of misery for The McCanns.

[Mr Gray]

Fifteen years of reminding people that the case isn't as simple and straitforward as it's sometimes portrayed. The McCanns were not cleared by the Portuguese Judiciary, despite them claiming they were. Their human rights weren't breached, despite them claiming they were. Abduction isn't the only crime which should be considered, despite the McCanns claiming that's what happened.

Do you realise SY have never had any power to investigate the McCanns or interview them under caution...shows Colin Sutton is an absolute fool

[Brietta]

Fifteen years of reminding people that the case isn't as simple and straitforward as it's sometimes portrayed. The McCanns were not cleared by the Portuguese Judiciary, despite them claiming they were. Their human rights weren't breached, despite them claiming they were. Abduction isn't the only crime which should be considered, despite the McCanns claiming that's what happened.

The arguido Amaral - arguido Tavares - arguido Cristovao were found guilty as charged.

The arguidos Murat - McCann - Healey were never charged with any offence and were exonerated by all charges against them being dropped. 

Didn't you notice?  Tiresomely you pretend not to.

But the fact is - since Murat - McCann - Healey were NEVER CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENCE THE PORTUGUESE AUTHORITIES WERE NEVER REQUIRED TO 'CLEAR' THEM. No charges being laid against them did that for them.

What else is it that you fail understand about Portuguese law? your lack of comprehension matches only the proven ineptitude which caused the PJ of the day to rely on dog indications which proved their irrelevance when the forensic results came back from the lab.

[G-Unit]

The arguido Amaral - arguido Tavares - arguido Cristovao were found guilty as charged.

The arguidos Murat - McCann - Healey were never charged with any offence and were exonerated by all charges against them being dropped. 

Didn't you notice?  Tiresomely you pretend not to.

But the fact is - since Murat - McCann - Healey were NEVER CHARGED WITH ANY OFFENCE THE PORTUGUESE AUTHORITIES WERE NEVER REQUIRED TO 'CLEAR' THEM. No charges being laid against them did that for them.

What else is it that you fail understand about Portuguese law? your lack of comprehension matches only the proven ineptitude which caused the PJ of the day to rely on dog indications which proved their irrelevance when the forensic results came back from the lab.

Someone should have told their lawyer that they didn't need to be cleared; she seemed very committed to the idea.

already cleared before through the filing dispatch of a criminal investigation
innocent and cleared citizen
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7937.0

[Eleanor]

This is hilarious, if some did but realise.  The Sceptics are as ever on the horns of a dilemma.

[G-Unit]

This is hilarious, if some did but realise.  The Sceptics are as ever on the horns of a dilemma.

What dilemma?

[Eleanor]

What dilemma?

Think about it.  Who can you trust to support your weird suppositions without them showing up their own inadequacies and possible involvement?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Someone should have told their lawyer that they didn't need to be cleared; she seemed very committed to the idea.

already cleared before through the filing dispatch of a criminal investigation
innocent and cleared citizen
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7937.0

What they didn’t need was to be accused all over again the day after officially being dropped as suspects.   If they weren’t entitled to their human rights being respected on the basis that their lawyer incorrectly claimed thst they’d been cleared (something which only a criminal trial can establish) then that is most unfortunate for them (but manna from heaven to the likes of you and fellow detractors).  At the end of the day the McCanns are not suspects, are not being investigated and the authorities are convinced Madeleine was abducted.  There’s nothing you, your sceptic pals or Amaral can ever say or do that will change those facts.  Nothing.  Yet still you persist.  Why?

[Eleanor]

What they didn’t need was to be accused all over again the day after officially being dropped as suspects.   If they weren’t entitled to their human rights being respected on the basis that their lawyer incorrectly claimed thst they’d been cleared (something which only a criminal trial can establish) then that is most unfortunate for them (but manna from heaven to the likes of you and fellow detractors).  At the end of the day the McCanns are not suspects, are not being investigated and the authorities are convinced Madeleine was abducted.  There’s nothing you, your sceptic pals or Amaral can ever say or do that will change those facts.  Nothing.  Yet still you persist.  Why?

I would like to know that.  But they haven't got anything to go on and never will have.  Not one single thing.