Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

Someone should have told their lawyer that they didn't need to be cleared; she seemed very committed to the idea.

already cleared before through the filing dispatch of a criminal investigation
innocent and cleared citizen
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7937.0

Merely stating the obvious.

Just as obvious as the fact that the trivia you continue to post was superseded in 2019 when Amaral announced via the vehicle of Saunokonoko's podcast that the new kid on the block was a German paedophile serving time for his crimes in a German jail.

Amazing that he was able to categorically declare him (or his alter ego) a patsy despite risibly knowing nothing about the case or evidence gathered short of the titbits sucked up from the dregs of the ever leaking sieve of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours".

The game is up for McCann sceptics and the death throes are unpleasant to witness from all aspects.

[Brietta]

Think about it.  Who can you trust to support your weird suppositions without them showing up their own inadequacies and possible involvement?

My opinion is that the problem is seated in that sceptic thought processes don't allow for independent thought processes to result in any sort of learning curve short of the circle line back to groundhog day.

It is not assimilated to the knowledge banks that Calpol is not an analgesic.

Who cares if the barking dogs mean zilch when the forensics are there and understood.

It is illogical and once that becomes apparent it makes the McCann sceptic belief system really rather weird.

[Brietta]

What they didn’t need was to be accused all over again the day after officially being dropped as suspects.   If they weren’t entitled to their human rights being respected on the basis that their lawyer incorrectly claimed thst they’d been cleared (something which only a criminal trial can establish) then that is most unfortunate for them (but manna from heaven to the likes of you and fellow detractors).  At the end of the day the McCanns are not suspects, are not being investigated and the authorities are convinced Madeleine was abducted.  There’s nothing you, your sceptic pals or Amaral can ever say or do that will change those facts.  Nothing.  Yet still you persist.  Why?

Why indeed?

Is there a vested interest in Madeleine's case never being solved.  I think the evidence is quite convincing that there may very well be and I think there could well be a discussion along those lines on its own thread while we await developments in Germany which are outwith our ken at the moment.

[Eleanor]

Sceptics are certainly becoming more and more desperate.  Relying on a discredited and convicted PJ Detective and  supporting a convicted Rapist and Child Abuser.  And many others who are blatantly fibbing in the process of making money on the back of an abducted child.  This is all seriously sick.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Why indeed?

Is there a vested interest in Madeleine's case never being solved.  I think the evidence is quite convincing that there may very well be and I think there could well be a discussion along those lines on its own thread while we await developments in Germany which are outwith our ken at the moment.

Of course there is - it allows certain "invested" people to keep their online hate and propaganda campaign alive, even though some of them refuse to view it as such.   All the while there is inconclusivity, and an element of doubt about what happened to Madeleine it allows conspiracies to flourish, though actually in this day and age, even a cast iron conviction and "proven without doubt" probably won't stop the hard core element - just look at alex Jones and Richard D Hall, two heroes of sceptic communities worldwide. 

[Eleanor]

Of course there is - it allows certain "invested" people to keep their online hate and propaganda campaign alive, even though some of them refuse to view it as such.   All the while there is inconclusivity, and an element of doubt about what happened to Madeleine it allows conspiracies to flourish, though actually in this day and age, even a cast iron conviction and "proven without doubt" probably won't stop the hard core element - just look at alex Jones and Richard D Hall, two heroes of sceptic communities worldwide.

I think it might be a bit more serious than that.

[Wonderfulspam]

Sceptics are certainly becoming more and more desperate.  Relying on a discredited and convicted PJ Detective and  supporting a convicted Rapist and Child Abuser.  And many others who are blatantly fibbing in the process of making money on the back of an abducted child.  This is all seriously sick.

Who, specifically, is 'supporting' a convicted rapist & child abuser & what exactly do you mean by 'supporting'?
On the one hand you claim to support Brueckner's right to the presumption of innocence, whilst simultaneously describing those who happen to do so as 'sick' it appears.

[Wonderfulspam]

Of course there is - it allows certain "invested" people to keep their online hate and propaganda campaign alive, even though some of them refuse to view it as such.   All the while there is inconclusivity, and an element of doubt about what happened to Madeleine it allows conspiracies to flourish, though actually in this day and age, even a cast iron conviction and "proven without doubt" probably won't stop the hard core element - just look at alex Jones and Richard D Hall, two heroes of sceptic communities worldwide.

What do you mean 'inconclusivity', Wolters has solved the case.

[G-Unit]

Think about it.  Who can you trust to support your weird suppositions without them showing up their own inadequacies and possible involvement?

I do my own research and reach my own conclusions based upon it. I neither need nor crave support. Neither do I crave approval; especially from anonymous people on the internet who are pushing their own agenda and think that bad-mouthing others gives them the moral high ground.

[Wonderfulspam]

Merely stating the obvious.

Just as obvious as the fact that the trivia you continue to post was superseded in 2019 when Amaral announced via the vehicle of Saunokonoko's podcast that the new kid on the block was a German paedophile serving time for his crimes in a German jail.

Amazing that he was able to categorically declare him (or his alter ego) a patsy despite risibly knowing nothing about the case or evidence gathered short of the titbits sucked up from the dregs of the ever leaking sieve of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours".

The game is up for McCann sceptics and the death throes are unpleasant to witness from all aspects.

The game is up.
That's hilarious, but then you do seem to be under the delusion that Brueckner is being charged one day.
Do get back to me when that day arrives won't you. Shouldn't be much longer now.

[Wonderfulspam]

I do my own research and reach my own conclusions based upon it. I neither need nor crave support. Neither do I crave approval; especially from anonymous people on the internet who are pushing their own agenda and think that bad-mouthing others gives them the moral high ground.

The bad mouthing is the substitute for evidence of abduction.

[Brietta]

I do my own research and reach my own conclusions based upon it. I neither need nor crave support. Neither do I crave approval; especially from anonymous people on the internet who are pushing their own agenda and think that bad-mouthing others gives them the moral high ground.

There are not - nor ever have been - two individuals who have been more "bad mouthed" worldwide than Kate and Gerry McCann.

Sceptics like you should really think hard about that before adding to the sceptic created morass of "research" based on personal prejudice never evidence.  Unless it is of the "here's one I made before" sort.

[Wonderfulspam]

The final death throes of the sceptic agenda because it's indisputable that Wolters has solved the case.
He does after all have concrete evidence. If you saw the evidence you'd be in no doubt. Just have faith in Wolters & keep believing because he's going to deliver the goods in 2023. Really, he will.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I do my own research and reach my own conclusions based upon it. I neither need nor crave support. Neither do I crave approval; especially from anonymous people on the internet who are pushing their own agenda and think that bad-mouthing others gives them the moral high ground.

What is the point of your research?  What do you hope to achieve?  You do know that your research is doomed to fail as you have limited access to the full evidence collated in this case don’t you??

[Vertigo Swirl]

I think it might be a bit more serious than that.

Well I like to give people the benefit of the doubt…