Wandering Off Topic

[G-Unit]

So do you now finally accept that the courts did not examine whether or not Amaral’s book contained defamatory and false allegations?   That it was not ever about libel but about whose rights trumped whose?   Incidentally if you can remember it the book did not mirror the investigation’s final conclusions which were that there was a lack of evidence that the McCanns were in any way involved in Madeleine’s disappearance.

The McCanns accused and Amaral defended. The court decided there was no basis for the accusations. Have you forgotten that the book covered only the period between May 3rd and September 10th 2007? The conclusions you refer to were reached in 2008.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The McCanns accused and Amaral defended. The court decided there was no basis for the accusations. Have you forgotten that the book covered only the period between May 3rd and September 10th 2007? The conclusions you refer to were reached in 2008.

Remind me - when was the book published?  If a newspaper published football scores as they stood at 45 minutes rather than after the ref blows his final whistle would that be an accurate reporting of the facts of the match?

[G-Unit]

But not for Gunit, it seems.  Her comment was meant as an insult.  But then I am used to being insulted by those more ignorant than I.

I don't actually care what drives your opinions. I object, however, to being accused of holding opinions which aren't mine, never have been mine and never will be. I agree with and support human rights and think they should apply to every human being; particularly the six absolute human rights.

[G-Unit]

Remind me - when was the book published?  If a newspaper published football scores as they stood at 45 minutes rather than after the ref blows his final whistle would that be an accurate reporting of the facts of the match?

What makes you think that a book's date of publication has anything to do with it's contents?

[Vertigo Swirl]

What makes you think that a book's date of publication has anything to do with it's contents?

It had everything to do with it IMO inasmuch as it peddled an incomplete account of the investigation dressed up as some sort of  definitive account.  That's what makes me think it, hope that's allowed.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Amaral's book was called "The Truth Of The Lie".  What truth does it purport to reveal and how was Amaral in any position to reveal it when the investigation hadn't come to an end at the point he was booted off?

[Wonderfulspam]

But what about my Human Rights?
I really shouldn't have to put up with people banging on about Amaral all the time. How can anyone be expected to live under such conditions? It's insufferable.

[Mr Gray]

I don't actually care what drives your opinions. I object, however, to being accused of holding opinions which aren't mine, never have been mine and never will be. I agree with and support human rights and think they should apply to every human being; particularly the six absolute human rights.

A Portuguese court ruled that Leonora Cipriano was tortured in police custody.
The pj officers claim she threw herself down the stairs which proves they were present when the injuries occurred. I have never heard you or any other anti support her human rights.....what does that meke your claim

[Eleanor]

A Portuguese court ruled that Leonora Cipriano was tortured in police custody.
The pj officers claim she threw herself down the stairs which proves they were present when the injuries occurred. I have never heard you or any other anti support her human rights.....what does that meke your claim

The only Human Right Gunit understands is her own.

[Vertigo Swirl]

A Portuguese court ruled that Leonora Cipriano was tortured in police custody.
The pj officers claim she threw herself down the stairs which proves they were present when the injuries occurred. I have never heard you or any other anti support her human rights.....what does that meke your claim

false imo

[Mr Gray]

false imo

It w.ould make what gunit said about respecting everyones  human rights a lie

[G-Unit]

It had everything to do with it IMO inasmuch as it peddled an incomplete account of the investigation dressed up as some sort of  definitive account.  That's what makes me think it, hope that's allowed.

Your opinion-which carries as much weight as did the McCann's opinion that the book harmed the search for their daughter. Neither can be proved.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Your opinion-which carries as much weight as did the McCann's opinion that the book harmed the search for their daughter. Neither can be proved.

Are you saying that it is just opinion that the book peddled an incomplete account of the investigation?  Surely that is an incontrovertible fact?

[G-Unit]

Are you saying that it is just opinion that the book peddled an incomplete account of the investigation?  Surely that is an incontrovertible fact?

As Amaral said;

Goncalo Amaral – The little girl died in the apartment. Everything is in the book, which is faithful to the investigation until September:
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6307.0 page 25

So it was made quite clear by the author which period of time the book covered, and upon which he based his opinions.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As Amaral said;

Goncalo Amaral – The little girl died in the apartment. Everything is in the book, which is faithful to the investigation until September:
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6307.0 page 25

So it was made quite clear by the author which period of time the book covered, and upon which he based his opinions.

yes, he peddled an incomplete account of the investigation, so not my opinion but an actual fact, thanks for confirming.