Wandering Off Topic

[Brietta]

Do you not understand who Amaral was?  He was supposed to be solving a crime.  And not telling all and sundry who done it, without proof.

Whichever way you look at it Amaral totally botched his job.

On the one hand he utterly failed in his mission a la Leonor when he failed to put Kate into the frame.  And it sure wasn't for the want of trying.

The mother accused of murdering her daughter at a village between Portimão and Lagos, has been released on parole after serving most of her 17-year sentence.
Leonor Cipriano was jailed in 2004 despite her eight-year old daughter Joana disappearing without a trace.
Upon her release, Leonor Cipriano stated her innocence and said she would now focus her efforts on finding her daughter, who she claims was abducted.

Like Madeleine - not a trace of Joana was ever found

On the other hand he has had to break his cover and become transparent in his efforts to interfere with the course of justice still attempting to wreck Madeleine's case.  Definitely another botched job in many ways despite the success of the support he has stirred up for another degenerate and waste of space.

As God made them he matched them, so it is said.   We have witnessed quite a devilish matching taking place here led by a weird man waving mocked up dreadlocked lies and fake images of vehicles in which the police had an interest.  You really couldn't make this up!

[Eleanor]

Whichever way you look at it Amaral totally botched his job.

On the one hand he utterly failed in his mission a la Leonor when he failed to put Kate into the frame.  And it sure wasn't for the want of trying.

The mother accused of murdering her daughter at a village between Portimão and Lagos, has been released on parole after serving most of her 17-year sentence.
Leonor Cipriano was jailed in 2004 despite her eight-year old daughter Joana disappearing without a trace.
Upon her release, Leonor Cipriano stated her innocence and said she would now focus her efforts on finding her daughter, who she claims was abducted.

Like Madeleine - not a trace of Joana was ever found

On the other hand he has had to break his cover and become transparent in his efforts to interfere with the course of justice still attempting to wreck Madeleine's case.  Definitely another botched job in many ways despite the success of the support he has stirred up for another degenerate and waste of space.

As God made them he matched them, so it is said.   We have witnessed quite a devilish matching taking place here led by a weird man waving mocked up dreadlocked lies and fake images of vehicles in which the police had an interest.  You really couldn't make this up!

It wasn't very clever was it.  He won against Leonor because she was just a peasant.  Kate is a very different kettle of fish.

But why is Portugal allowing Amaral to tell all of these lies?  That's what I want to know.

Or perhaps more to the point, why is Amaral doing this?

[jassi]

What action would you expect Portugal to take against a private citizen?

[Eleanor]

What action would you expect Portugal to take against a private citizen?

Telling lies and interfering with The Course of Justice while trying to prove that Brueckner wasn't there?  What do you think should happen?

[Wonderfulspam]

Telling lies and interfering with The Course of Justice while trying to prove that Brueckner wasn't there?  What do you think should happen?

But is he , actually, interfering with the course of justice? You keep trotting out that he is, over & over again. But Wolters hasn't complained about him at all. The only time he has mentioned Amaral was to say that he (Amaral) doesn't know what evidence they (the BKA) have. Nothing Amaral can do or say could disrupt the concrete evidence anyway. It's 100% convincing & already enough to charge.

[Wonderfulspam]

What action would you expect Portugal to take against a private citizen?

They could try complaining about him incessantly.

[jassi]

Telling lies and interfering with The Course of Justice while trying to prove that Brueckner wasn't there?  What do you think should happen?

I can't see he's doing anything illegal.
He is certainly not interfering with the course of justice. Indeed he is having no effect on the police investigation at all.

Therefore I can't see what the State of Portugal can do as he is not breaking any laws.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I can't see he's doing anything illegal.
He is certainly not interfering with the course of justice. Indeed he is having no effect on the police investigation at all.

Therefore I can't see what the State of Portugal can do as he is not breaking any laws.

Despite his best efforts.  I hope that’s pissing him off big time.

[G-Unit]

mm

I can't see he's doing anything illegal.
He is certainly not interfering with the course of justice. Indeed he is having no effect on the police investigation at all.

Therefore I can't see what the State of Portugal can do as he is not breaking any laws.

He thinks MM died on 3rd May 2007. Others agree, although not with the date or the place. They are probably all correct. The disagreement is about who was involved and why. No-one knows the answer to that.

[Brietta]

It wasn't very clever was it.  He won against Leonor because she was just a peasant.  Kate is a very different kettle of fish.

But why is Portugal allowing Amaral to tell all of these lies?  That's what I want to know.

Or perhaps more to the point, why is Amaral doing this?

He certainly didn't do it unaided.  There are some in the know then there are the patsies who have allowed themselves to be used.
I too would like to know the whys and wherefores, but I suspect the likes of us never will.  Nor will the patsies.

[Brietta]

What action would you expect Portugal to take against a private citizen?

He interfered with a PJ investigation.

He broke the secrecy of justice. 

Both allegedly punishable offences.

I expect Portugal to do what it always does when Amaral breaks their laws.

[Vertigo Swirl]

mm
He thinks MM died on 3rd May 2007. Others agree, although not with the date or the place. They are probably all correct. The disagreement is about who was involved and why. No-one knows the answer to that.

Amaral claimed he knows the answer in a bestselling book he called “The Truth Of The Lie”.  You think he was right.  Between you you need to figure out why no one is currently remotely interested in picking up on Amaral’s claims.  Any ideas?

[jassi]

He interfered with a PJ investigation.

He broke the secrecy of justice. 

Both allegedly punishable offences.

I expect Portugal to do what it always does when Amaral breaks their laws.

Away with you, he did nothing of the sort  You are simply obsessed with the man

[Brietta]

Away with you, he did nothing of the sort  You are simply obsessed with the man

Not one iota as much as he is to do harm to the McCanns and their daughter.  It really is some giant of an obsession but what is even worse is that the malign contaminant affects others.

[Eleanor]

Not one iota as much as he is to do harm to the McCanns and their daughter.  It really is some giant of an obsession but what is even worse is that the malign contaminant affects others.

Amaral isn't even very clever, although he appears to think that he is.  He should never have been allowed on that investigation with a Perjury Charge pending.