Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 3010765 times)

0 Members and 109 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15300 on: November 27, 2023, 10:02:33 AM »
I don’t get your point. Are you saying you know for a fact CB never uttered those words to HB?

I don't think it really matters that Brueckner's lawyers are trying to discredit witnesses. Of course they are because quite simply, it is all they've got to play with in his defence.

And why would associates of Brueckner be paragons of virtue anyway? Highly unlikely.

The clincher will be the evidence which is due to be heard in the five trials scheduled for Feb 2024. If that passes muster and there is no reason to think it won't, Brueckner won't ever be able to scale another wall or enter via another balcony to do what it is he does. He will end out his days behind bars reminiscent of those installed in Luz properties lending weight to the burglary problem they had; not to mention the random sex attacks endemic at the time.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15301 on: November 27, 2023, 11:15:03 AM »
I don't think it really matters that Brueckner's lawyers are trying to discredit witnesses. Of course they are because quite simply, it is all they've got to play with in his defence.

And why would associates of Brueckner be paragons of virtue anyway? Highly unlikely.

The clincher will be the evidence which is due to be heard in the five trials scheduled for Feb 2024. If that passes muster and there is no reason to think it won't, Brueckner won't ever be able to scale another wall or enter via another balcony to do what it is he does. He will end out his days behind bars reminiscent of those installed in Luz properties lending weight to the burglary problem they had; not to mention the random sex attacks endemic at the time.



Yes, but dont we know all this ....he is a wrong un awaiting trial in Germany.

How do you work out this will ever prove he is the abductor of Maddie...Maddie who should be the four front of all this.

They will get... if found guilty another burglar/paedo of the street....

I think more would be interested in what happened to Maddie....not whats going to happen to CB.

I think in this case we desperately need a common sense corner B

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15302 on: November 27, 2023, 01:36:32 PM »
He is not a credible witness. HB claimed CB said 'She did not scream'. How that fact has been distorted and manipulated by the authorities and media is quite incredible. Desperation springs to mind. It was reported and is a fact that nobody heard screaming the night Madeleine disappeared!

It depends on how he said it.   If he said it in a knowing way as if he knew she didn't scream such as 'she didn't scream' stated as fact,  then that is quite different to us saying    'funny , she didn't scream'. 

You are forgetting he knew CB very well and would catch on to what he was saying and how he was saying it.


Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15303 on: November 27, 2023, 02:46:33 PM »
It depends on how he said it.   If he said it in a knowing way as if he knew she didn't scream such as 'she didn't scream' stated as fact,  then that is quite different to us saying    'funny , she didn't scream'. 

You are forgetting he knew CB very well and would catch on to what he was saying and how he was saying it.

It depends on how he said it.

what he was saying and how he was saying it.

And...................

How are you ever going to know fgs

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15304 on: November 27, 2023, 04:34:57 PM »
It depends on how he said it.

what he was saying and how he was saying it.

And...................

How are you ever going to know fgs
The same way you know the McCanns dunnit I expect ;-)
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15305 on: November 27, 2023, 04:55:12 PM »
The same way you know the McCanns dunnit I expect ;-)

What's your point here.

Is your post suggesting L knows CB done it.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15306 on: November 27, 2023, 05:08:39 PM »
What's your point here.

Is your post suggesting L knows CB done it.
No, I’m not.  Lace made it clear that she doesn’t know how it was said, nor did she claim that she would ever know, but nevertheless you appeared to be exasperated by her post.  My reply was simply to point out that you appear to “know” stuff about this case (McCanns are involved, CB definitely isn’t etc)  without actually knowing anything for certain at all. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15307 on: November 27, 2023, 05:23:40 PM »
No, I’m not.  Lace made it clear that she doesn’t know how it was said, nor did she claim that she would ever know, but nevertheless you appeared to be exasperated by her post.  My reply was simply to point out that you appear to “know” stuff about this case (McCanns are involved, CB definitely isn’t etc)  without actually knowing anything for certain at all.

Did she.

She certainly Thinks he said it ......it seems in her post.

Online Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15308 on: November 27, 2023, 05:34:37 PM »

We do not know the context in which the remark was made.  And Lace never suggested that she did.

Offline Lace

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15309 on: November 27, 2023, 05:36:45 PM »
It depends on how he said it.

what he was saying and how he was saying it.

And...................

How are you ever going to know fgs

In court.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15310 on: November 27, 2023, 06:00:54 PM »
In court.

What court ?................... Has CB been charged with abducting Maddie then ....or are you saying he will be.

Online Eleanor

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15311 on: November 27, 2023, 06:17:25 PM »

I am going to get cross in a minute if this sniping goes on.

Offline kizzy

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15312 on: November 27, 2023, 06:44:44 PM »
I am going to get cross in a minute if this sniping goes on.

Well do you know what court L means.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15313 on: November 27, 2023, 07:05:12 PM »
Well do you know what court L means.
it means “we will know more about what was said, to whom and how if and when the case comes to court”.  Why you are getting so worked up about this is mystifying.  I would recommend the self-administration of a chill pill.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #15314 on: November 27, 2023, 07:12:06 PM »
I am going to get cross in a minute if this sniping goes on.

Cross? We haven't even had direct yet.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club