Wandering Off Topic

[faithlilly]

The McCanns are very obviously innocent of their child?s disappearance and only a complete fool would still be clutching to such a belief after all these years.  As for Bruckner, he is still the chief and only official suspect, and still an arguido too I believe??

Yet after 5 years has never been as much as arrested.

If only the combined police forces of three countries had been able to investigate the parents for 5 years. Who knows what might have been revealed!

[kizzy]

The McCanns are very obviously innocent of their child?s disappearance and only a complete fool would still be clutching to such a belief after all these years.  As for Bruckner, he is still the chief and only official suspect, and still an arguido too I believe??

Well you could say the same about thinking every suspect that coms along is the abductor.

The moral of the story though ...still is...no proof Maddie was ever abducted in the first place,

seems over the years you have done a lot of toing and froing as who is responsible

Where as most of us has stuck with the same suspect said from day one CB not the abductor 5 year later still isnt.

your post is a bit sad really...you shouldn't be calling other posters fools 

[kizzy]

same thing happened to me some months ago now.  You haven?t missed anything.  This site is to all intents and purposes a dead forum now, only a few saddoes like me left haunting the place.

only a few saddoes like me left haunting the place.


Oh...so you agree with my previous post awww

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yet after 5 years has never been as much as arrested.

If only the combined police forces of three countries had been able to investigate the parents for 5 years. Who knows what might have been revealed!

Absolutely nothing of any relevance to Madeleine?s disappearance.  What areas of investigation do you think they should have pursued that they didn?t?  Incidentally, the combined police forces of three countries don?t spend 5 years investigating a suspect on a whim, do they?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well you could say the same about thinking every suspect that coms along is the abductor.

The moral of the story though ...still is...no proof Maddie was ever abducted in the first place,

seems over the years you have done a lot of toing and froing as who is responsible

Where as most of us has stuck with the same suspect said from day one CB not the abductor 5 year later still isnt.

your post is a bit sad really...you shouldn't be calling other posters fools

would you care to elaborate on the statement in bold?  No, I thought not.

[Vertigo Swirl]

only a few saddoes like me left haunting the place.


Oh...so you agree with my previous post awww

Hello fellow saddo!

[Joe Blogs]

Hello fellow saddo!

I suppose the main problem with accusing anyone of abducting Maddie is the fact that there was absolutely no DNA, fingerprints, hairs, footprints or anything else recovered from the apartment that could be used to tie a living sole to the crime scene, or was there?
Still, I suppose the abductor could still have something belonging to Maddie in their possession tying them to the crime, although Breuckner certainly hasn't had anything on him for many years, it would need to be hidden somewhere?
No, if Breuckner is the culprit then the police will have to wait for a confession or find the body in a place he has frequented!
Neither seem likely at the moment, do they?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I suppose the main problem with accusing anyone of abducting Maddie is the fact that there was absolutely no DNA, fingerprints, hairs, footprints or anything else recovered from the apartment that could be used to tie a living sole to the crime scene, or was there?
Still, I suppose the abductor could still have something belonging to Maddie in their possession tying them to the crime, although Breuckner certainly hasn't had anything on him for many years, it would need to be hidden somewhere?
No, if Breuckner is the culprit then the police will have to wait for a confession or find the body in a place he has frequented!
Neither seem likely at the moment, do they?

Sadly not no.  Some abduction / murders never get definitively solved, that?s just life I?m afraid.

[kizzy]

Sadly not no.  Some abduction / murders never get definitively solved, that?s just life I?m afraid.

Some abduction / murders never get definitively solved


Yep.....and only looking at one scenario [abduction] doesn't help.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some abduction / murders never get definitively solved


Yep.....and only looking at one scenario [abduction] doesn't help.

What would help then?  Spell out exactly what you think the police should do now.

[kizzy]

would you care to elaborate on the statement in bold?  No, I thought not.

Well you thought wrong..

One of your statements was you suspected the mcs at one time.

[kizzy]

What would help then?  Spell out exactly what you think the police should do now.

Do now......bit late for that.

Its what they should have done.

But there again never say never.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Well you thought wrong..

One of your statements was you suspected the mcs at one time.

Alot of to-ing and fro-ing you said?  I suspected them for about 5 minutes when they were made arguidos in 2007, hardly alot of to-ing and fro-ing.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do now......bit late for that.

Its what they should have done.

But there again never say never.

Tell us what they should have done thst they never did then, thst you think would have nailed the McCanns.

[kizzy]

Alot of to-ing and fro-ing you said?  I suspected them for about 5 minutes when they were made arguidos in 2007, hardly alot of to-ing and fro-ing.

I suspected them for about 5 minutes when they were made arguidos

That's my point you see........going with the narrative.

like now ........C.B. must be the abductor...because ur told he is.