Author Topic: Wandering Off Topic  (Read 2270349 times)

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17775 on: March 31, 2026, 09:34:25 PM »
Well, lets just say that Breuckner was within striking distance of Maddie McCann on the day she went missing! Is that fair enough, jassi?

The phone was registered as somewhere within the range of the mast - about a diameter of about 3Km. Potentialy quite some distance from the Ocean Club.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17776 on: March 31, 2026, 09:42:15 PM »
Well we only know for sure that Brueckner was in the Praia da Luz area between 7.30-8.00 on the night of the disappearance, Spam! Whether he went home after that phone call or went forth to abduct Maddie is anyone's guess at the moment!

But Brueckner was in Luz most nights. He was there most nights for several years, & yet, no children got abducted. What was so special about May 3rd that made him want to take up child abduction?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17777 on: March 31, 2026, 09:43:18 PM »
The phone was registered as somewhere within the range of the mast - about a diameter of about 3Km. Potentialy quite some distance from the Ocean Club.
I see! Thanks, jassi!

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17778 on: March 31, 2026, 09:44:44 PM »
Quite right, Kizzy! My opinion really doesn't matter much at all!
I'm years behind the rest of you!

& in terms of age, I'm years behind most of the women folk here. Several decades behind in maturity also.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17779 on: March 31, 2026, 09:47:43 PM »
But Brueckner was in Luz most nights. He was there most nights for several years, & yet, no children got abducted. What was so special about May 3rd that made him want to take up child abduction?
Is there any evidence that Brueckner left the area abruptly soon after the disappearance, Spam?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17780 on: March 31, 2026, 09:50:29 PM »
It seems a bit unfair to me that sceptics have to put forth precise down to the minute detail about how exactly the McCanns did it. But when it comes to Brueckner, his mear existence is felt sufficient to prove that Madeleine was abducted. It's ridiculous.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17781 on: March 31, 2026, 09:55:56 PM »
It seems a bit unfair to me that sceptics have to put forth precise down to the minute detail about how exactly the McCanns did it. But when it comes to Brueckner, his mear existence is felt sufficient to prove that Madeleine was abducted. It's ridiculous.
Is it true that Bruek re-registered his car in someone elses name the day after Maddie disappeared, Spam?
Did he give a reason for this action?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17782 on: March 31, 2026, 10:46:04 PM »
The phone was registered as somewhere within the range of the mast - about a diameter of about 3Km. Potentialy quite some distance from the Ocean Club.
About 5 minutes by car.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17783 on: March 31, 2026, 10:49:11 PM »
Is it true that Bruek re-registered his car in someone elses name the day after Maddie disappeared, Spam?
Did he give a reason for this action?
Yes, but apparently there is nothing suspicious about this at all and it?s merely another coincidence.  Anything Bruckner has ever said or done is not remotely suspicious and only retarded old ladies and HCW think otherwise. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17784 on: March 31, 2026, 10:54:28 PM »
Yes, but apparently there is nothing suspicious about this at all and it?s merely another coincidence.  Anything Bruckner has ever said or done is not remotely suspicious and only retarded old ladies and HCW think otherwise.
I continue to keep an open mind regarding the case, Vertigo!

Offline Joe Blogs

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17785 on: March 31, 2026, 10:57:29 PM »
About 5 minutes by car.
37 minutes walking distance!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17786 on: April 01, 2026, 08:28:24 AM »
37 minutes walking distance!
Bruckner had several vehicles at his disposal so easier for him to nip in and out of town in one of them.  If I recall correctly a car matching the description of the jag (ie long, dark coloured saloon car) he had re-registered the next day was seen parked up near the OC by a witness in the night Madeleine went missing.  I?m not saying it was definitely his car before I get jumped on but it?s a possibility.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Uncle Jr

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17787 on: April 01, 2026, 08:58:41 AM »
37 minutes walking distance!
About the size of the Isle of Dogs - 7.1km2 - quite a lot of ground.

Offline Uncle Jr

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17788 on: April 01, 2026, 09:02:20 AM »
I continue to keep an open mind regarding the case, Vertigo!
This has always puzzled me. Re-registering a car doesn't make it disappear and the length of time it must've took to go through the process would almost certainly be weeks rather than hours. There's no advantage to someone fleeing a scene is my point, apart from potentially financial.
I dismiss this as irrelevant for that reason.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2026, 09:45:53 AM by Uncle Jr »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Wandering Off Topic
« Reply #17789 on: April 01, 2026, 09:12:47 AM »
About the size of the Isle of Dogs - 7.1km2 - quite a lot of ground.
With PdL in the centre so no more than 3km in any direction.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".