Are you a supporter, a sceptic or a fence sitter?

[Admin]

I don't think we have ever asked this question on the forum previously so it is being put out to all members.  Please answer honestly, your vote is completely anonymous and confidential.

Feel free to add comments below if you want.

Admin

44

[jassi]

Is a 'fence-sitter' not the same as a 'not sure'?

[Mr Gray]

Is a 'fence-sitter' not the same as a 'not sure'?

you would have to define what "not sure " means...do you mean 50/50....or if I say I'm 99.99% certain does that mean I'm not sure

On that basis I see myself as a supporter of the Mccanns....but also of madeleine of course. I'm surprised this is an anonymous poll

[ShiningInLuz]

I made it clear earlier on that if I had 40 votes to cast then around 2 would be for McCann involvement and 38 would be against.

This does not make me pro-McCann.

Technically, it does not make me a fence-sitter, though that is how I voted.

Perhaps unsure would have been a better choice.  Who knows if we'll ever get more solid info to help clarify this.

[jassi]

None of us are really sure, we only think we are.

[Jean-Pierre]

I am inclined to agree with that - having followed this case for some years, and on the basis of the available evidence, I cannot see the McCanns having been involved in the disappearance of Madeleine. 

If new evidence were to come to light I may change my stance in the light of that evidence - that is logical.  But as things stand - Madeleine and her parents were very unlucky to fall foul of abductor(s) unknown. 

[ferryman]

What Jean-Pierre said ....

[Mr Gray]

None of us are really sure, we only think we are.

has anyone said they are sure...you should speak for yourself and not others

[Admin]

It is the unknown element which renders this case so intriguing.

[Mr Gray]

I am inclined to agree with that - having followed this case for some years, and on the basis of the available evidence, I cannot see the McCanns having been involved in the disappearance of Madeleine. 

If new evidence were to come to light I may change my stance in the light of that evidence - that is logical.  But as things stand - Madeleine and her parents were very unlucky to fall foul of abductor(s) unknown.

my thoughts exactly

[Angelo222]

I was sceptical in the beginning but since studying the facts I am even more convinced.  The parents actions following Maddie's disappearance were not consistent with the abduction story imo.

[Mr Gray]

In reality a fence sitter does not believe the McCanns and is therefore a sceptic

[Mr Gray]

I was sceptical in the beginning but since studying the facts I am even more convinced.  The parents actions following Maddie's disappearance were not consistent with the abduction story imo.

It's interesting that IMO their actions are totally consistent with abduction

[LagosBen]

It's interesting that IMO their actions are totally consistent with abduction

Exactly.

[jassi]

In reality a fence sitter does not believe the McCanns and is therefore a sceptic

Yes, its all or nothing with a believer.