Harmed or not harmed ...that is the question

[Miss Taken Identity]

http://youtu.be/gFZy2f2yQJA?t=3m44s says "there is no evidence to suggest that she has been harmed, in any way whatsoever" but soon after oddly gives as example a case in california where the victim was harmed

Indeed Pegs!  that is what got me thinking, talking about it and why I produced this thread I thought it very strange.
___________________________________________________________________________

[Mr Gray]

of course  if maddie was alive she would have been harmed both physically  and emotionally     why is there so much denial  by people with this case? maddie   was 3  years old

have you read any of the posts,,,,no one is denying it ...try reading the posts forst

[Mr Gray]

The book did not harm the search.

It is a myth.

that isn't what the court judgement said ..is it

[carlymichelle]

The book did not harm the search.

It is a myth.

most people cant  read portugese so  most people  couldnt  read his  book?

[pegasus]

Indeed Pegs!  that is what got me thinking, talking about it and why I produced this thread I thought it very strange.

Yes why couldn't their spokesperson think of an appropriate example, instead of the Garrido case?

[stephen25000]

that isn't what the court judgement said ..is it

The book did not harm the search.

She was searched for.

Nothing has been found.

FACTS.

[Mr Gray]

The book did not harm the search.

She was searched for.

Nothing has been found.

FACTS.

that isn't what the court judgement said..is it

[stephen25000]

that isn't what the court judgement said..is it

Madeleine was searched for.

She was not found.

That has not changed.

Just the FACTS.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Yes why couldn't their spokesperson think of an appropriate example, instead of the Garrido case?

Because...there is no available data which states people who are abducted then returned to families were not harmed  (in some way).

There are cases where abductees become emotianally attached to their abductors, Some who are sexually,physically or emotionally abused over a long period of time. This is a type of harm caused due to the controlled behaviour endured by the abductee- they become subservant and are rewared for 'good behaviour' etc.

[carlymichelle]

Because...there is no available data which states people who are abducted then returned to families were not harmed  (in some way).

There are cases where abductees become emotianally attached to their abductors, Some who are sexually,physically or emotionally abused over a long period of time. This is a type of harm caused due to the controlled behaviour endured by the abductee- they become subservant and are rewared for 'good behaviour' etc.

stockholm sydrome

[Mr Gray]

Madeleine was searched for.

She was not found.

That has not changed.

Just the FACTS.

#what has changed is the contents of your posts,,,read back...it's quite funny

[mercury]

most people cant  read portugese so  most people  couldnt  read his  book?

Even if they could, there is nothing to say
A) they were convinced by the book, which I find an erroneous argument, and even if they were, would report a sightng IMO
B) anyone was actually looking still in summer 2008 and beyond whether convnced or not

Not quanitifable and not qualifiable, to say who was looking, how many and when, just a claim

[carlymichelle]

Even if they could, there is nothing to say
A) they were convinced by the book, which I find an erroneous argument, and even if they were, would report a sightng IMO
B) anyone was actually looking still in summer 2008 and beyond whether convnced or not

Not quanitifable and not qualifiable, to say who was looking, how many and when, just a claim

exactly most people dont need  books to  make up their minds about things  its called  free thinking

[stephen25000]

#what has changed is the contents of your posts,,,read back...it's quite funny

Nope.

The judge said the book had not hindered the search or had caused damage to the twins.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Even if they could, there is nothing to say
A) they were convinced by the book, which I find an erroneous argument, and even if they were, would report a sightng IMO
B) anyone was actually looking still in summer 2008 and beyond whether convnced or not

Not quanitifable and not qualifiable, to say who was looking, how many and when, just a claim

Indeed!  and I keep asking the question.... who was looking for a child from the pictures we were being fed? it was a global search EVERYBODY was supposed to be looking. I know I wasn't and  I never read the book!