Author Topic: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?  (Read 140383 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #240 on: October 19, 2018, 10:11:31 AM »

These questions are getting silly now.

Offline barrier

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #241 on: October 19, 2018, 10:18:45 AM »
If you ask a stupid question you may be stupid for five minutes, if you don't ask you may be stupid all your life.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #242 on: October 19, 2018, 10:21:59 AM »

I shall be deleting any further silly questions.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #243 on: October 19, 2018, 10:24:22 AM »
You said they had no value? Why would you evaluate something with no value?
You don't know they have no value until you evaluate them

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #244 on: October 19, 2018, 11:31:58 AM »
They were evaluated and found to have no value.

The alerts weren't evidence, but they were intelligence according to Bob Small;

the British police regarded the use of sniffer dogs as intelligence rather than evidence
[madeleine]

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Sunny

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #245 on: October 19, 2018, 03:25:32 PM »
They were evaluated and found to have no value.

Who carried it out, and when were the alerts in Praia Da Luz evaluated Eleanor?
Members are reminded that cites must be provided in accordance with the forum rules. On several occasions recently cites have been requested but never provided. Asking for a cite is not goading but compliance.

From this moment onward, posts making significant claims which are not backed up by a cite will be removed.

Moderators and Editors take note!

Offline Eleanor

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #246 on: October 19, 2018, 03:33:37 PM »
Who carried it out, and when were the alerts in Praia Da Luz evaluated Eleanor?

I have no idea.  You would have to ask The PJ.  But it was obviously done at some point because no further action was taken.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #247 on: October 19, 2018, 04:05:02 PM »
Who carried it out, and when were the alerts in Praia Da Luz evaluated Eleanor?

SY reviewed the evidence and decided Maddie could  still be alive so obviously  do not think the alerts confirm Maddie's death

Offline barrier

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #248 on: October 19, 2018, 04:07:06 PM »
SY reviewed the evidence and decided Maddie could  still be alive so obviously  do not think the alerts confirm Maddie's death


Which is a possible reason the case is at an impasse, imo.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #249 on: October 19, 2018, 04:33:51 PM »

Which is a possible reason the case is at an impasse, imo.

I would think SY are a very good judge on the significance of the alerts

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #250 on: October 19, 2018, 05:55:09 PM »
SY reviewed the evidence and decided Maddie could  still be alive so obviously  do not think the alerts confirm Maddie's death

They also decided she could be dead. They sound a little unsure to me.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #251 on: October 20, 2018, 12:53:33 AM »
They also decided she could be dead. They sound a little unsure to me.
Are they covering their bases?  Either she is dead or alive, both possible.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #252 on: October 20, 2018, 07:27:10 AM »
They also decided she could be dead. They sound a little unsure to me.
Which just goes to show how much store they set by the dog alerts.  “May be alive, may be dead”,  one could deduce this without the dog alerts at all.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #253 on: October 20, 2018, 08:07:59 AM »
Which just goes to show how much store they set by the dog alerts.  “May be alive, may be dead”,  one could deduce this without the dog alerts at all.

Precisely... The alerts changed nothing to those who understand... Imo

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?
« Reply #254 on: October 20, 2018, 08:16:38 AM »
Which just goes to show how much store they set by the dog alerts.  “May be alive, may be dead”,  one could deduce this without the dog alerts at all.

Davel seemed to think that OG said Madeleine might be alive meant that they had dismissed the dog alerts. I simply reminded him that they also said she might be dead. There's also the digging, of course.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0