Pick any sentence from Kate's book.

[sadie]

That was the perception according to Kate McCann but very naive if I might say so.  Amaral would have observed both parents at an early stage, he had no need to 'meet' them, that was the job of his detectives and liaison officers.

If you don't mind my saying so, Angelo

What a ridiculous statement !!

[Alfie]

There are many aspects of this case which are concerning to say the least. The attempts to pervert the course of justice are well documented.

Attempting to pervert the course of justice is a serious criminal matter and one which can result in charges and if found guilty imprisonment.  Who are you accusing of perverting the course of justice and what is your evidence for your claim?

[Angelo222]

Everything adds up, it's just that some people aren't very good at maths.

I disagree, the forensics do not support the intruder abduction claim but then why let a small detail like that get in the way of a good story.

[Angelo222]

If you don't mind my saying so, Angelo

What a ridiculous statement !!

Is it ridiculous because you don't like it?  Amaral was in charge of the case and saw the McCanns on the news from day 1.  The McCanns did not know Amaral and would not have recognised him even if they saw him.

Amaral would have been there observing while the McCanns were questioned, the McCanns would not have known that.

[Angelo222]

Attempting to pervert the course of justice is a serious criminal matter and one which can result in charges and if found guilty imprisonment.  Who are you accusing of perverting the course of justice and what is your evidence for your claim?

I know the facts Alf, I suggest you do a bit of research too.  Alternatively you could await Amaral's next book and read all about it?

[sadie]

Is it ridiculous because you don't like it?  Amaral was in charge of the case and saw the McCanns on the news from day 1.  The McCanns did not know Amaral and would not have recognised him even if they saw him.

Amaral would have been there observing while the McCanns were questioned, the McCanns would not have known that.

So you KNOW that do you?

HOW ?

[Alfie]

I disagree, the forensics do not support the intruder abduction claim but then why let a small detail like that get in the way of a good story.

The forensics certainly don't rule out an intruder abduction either but don't let a small detail like that get in the way either.

[Alfie]

I know the facts Alf, I suggest you do a bit of research too.  Alternatively you could await Amaral's next book and read all about it?

Hang on a minute.  As per the rules of this forum, you make an accusation, you back it up - you don't say "wait for the book to reveal all"!

[Alfie]

Only if backed up by hard evidence.  This forum operates on the basis of established facts, theories basis on personal hunches and opinion are positively discouraged.

Just to remind Angelo of his / her own words, and looking forward to hearing about all the established facts which support his /her accusation concerning perverting the course of justice in this case.

[stephen25000]

The forensics certainly don't rule out an intruder abduction either but don't let a small detail like that get in the way either.

Neither do the forensics rule out accidental death....

[sadie]

Neither do the forensics rule out accidental death....

Nothing to support accidental death at all stephen ... No forensics or anything ... and I suspect you, as an intelligent person know that.

[stephen25000]

Nothing to support accidental death at all stephen ... No forensics or anything ... and I suspect you, as an intelligent person know that.

No corroboration of the dogs.

However, a lack of evidence does not mean a crime did not occur or an accident.

[stephen25000]

Nothing to support accidental death at all stephen ... No forensics or anything ... and I suspect you, as an intelligent person know that.

....and remember, no forensic evidence to show anyone else in the apartment, let alone an abduction.

[sadie]

No corroboration of the dogs.

However, a lack of evidence does not mean a crime did not occur or an accident.

Right Lack of evidence and you use that total lack to point at the Mccanns

Cum on, stephen, how about fair play?.

[sadie]

....and remember, no forensic evidence to show anyone else in the apartment, let alone an abduction.

Hahaha

No forensic evidence?  Not even of all the people who crowded in there and unhappily opened and touchede things.

I wonder why there was no forensic evidence of these people either ?

Hahhaha