« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?  (Read 20568 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfie

  • Guest
Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« on: October 08, 2016, 06:55:24 PM »
Until someone is convicted in this case everyone is still a suspect, or so the theory goes (amongst some of us anyway).  So, what of Murat?  Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?  Let's discuss...

57
« Last Edit: October 11, 2016, 01:40:38 PM by John »
Logged

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2016, 07:26:21 PM »
Quote from: Alfie on October 08, 2016, 06:55:24 PM
Until someone is convicted in this case everyone is still a suspect, or so the theory goes (amongst some of us anyway).  So, what of Murat?  Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?  Let's discuss...

Why?
« Last Edit: October 10, 2016, 12:57:23 PM by John »
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2016, 07:37:45 PM »
Quote from: Alfie on October 08, 2016, 06:55:24 PM
Until someone is convicted in this case everyone is still a suspect, or so the theory goes (amongst some of us anyway).  So, what of Murat?  Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?  Let's discuss...
I always thought why he was chosen to become part of the investigation is important.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2016, 12:57:36 PM by John »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2016, 08:08:07 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on October 08, 2016, 07:37:45 PM
I always thought why he was chosen to become part of the investigation is important.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2007/may/16/giles.tremlett.on.madeleine.mccann

1m13s partly explains why.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2016, 12:38:17 PM by John »
Logged

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2016, 08:10:00 PM »
Logged

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2016, 08:20:48 PM »
Irrespective of who put him in the frame, was there any evidence?
« Last Edit: October 10, 2016, 12:39:01 PM by John »
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2016, 08:21:17 PM »
Quote from: misty on October 08, 2016, 08:08:07 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2007/may/16/giles.tremlett.on.madeleine.mccann

1m13s partly explains why.
He was involved in realestate, he lived close by, he knew the languages and he was interested.
I tend to think that the people who were involved had a problem if Robert Murat was not controlled.  A bit like another ShinginLuz character that knew how PDL worked.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2016, 08:23:28 PM »
Quote from: Alfie on October 08, 2016, 08:20:48 PM
Irrespective of who put him in the frame, was there any evidence?
Everything he has said.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2016, 12:39:42 PM by John »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline jassi

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2016, 08:38:03 PM »
Quote from: Alfie on October 08, 2016, 08:20:48 PM
Irrespective of who put him in the frame, was there any evidence?

I think it's what's called an alibi.
« Last Edit: October 10, 2016, 12:40:01 PM by John »
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline misty

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2016, 08:39:53 PM »
Quote from: jassi on October 08, 2016, 08:38:03 PM
I think it's what's called an alibi.

Which of his 3 "alibis" would that be?
« Last Edit: October 08, 2016, 08:42:13 PM by misty »
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2016, 08:43:32 PM »
Quote from: misty on October 08, 2016, 08:39:53 PM
Which of his 3 "alibis" would that be?

Whichever one can't be broken.
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2016, 08:49:33 PM »
Quote from: misty on October 08, 2016, 08:39:53 PM
Which of his 3 "alibis" would that be?
What were the three alibis? 
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline misty

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2016, 08:51:40 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on October 08, 2016, 08:49:33 PM
What were the three alibis?

Unknown witness said he was drinking in a pub elsewhere
He originally said he went to a JW meeting but changed his mind
His mother said he was at home all night
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #13 on: October 08, 2016, 08:59:33 PM »
Quote from: misty on October 08, 2016, 08:51:40 PM
Unknown witness said he was drinking in a pub elsewhere
He originally said he went to a JW meeting but changed his mind
His mother said he was at home all night
Actual cites please.  This is all news to me.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is the 1st arguido, Robert Murat, no longer of interest in this case?
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2016, 10:12:57 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on October 08, 2016, 08:59:33 PM
Actual cites please.  This is all news to me.

Try reading some of this:
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id90.html
The quotes from Clarence Mitchell if you can find them are a eye opener.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5   Go Up
« previous next »