It has been said repeatedly, on this forum and elsewhere that the Mccanns received many letters from people saying they did the same as the Mccanns, and ergo by implication, what the Mccanns did was perfectly normal behaviour.
Yet this claim has never been substantiated.
Several posters on here have claimed to have done the same, but as they support the Mccanns, their claims could well be viewed as bias.
I know of a couple, the parents of one of my students, who left their young son , a 4 year old , in a hotel while they went out to dinner, with the door locked. He got out with a key, and wandered off. Fortunately, local people found him and returned him to the hotel and his scared parents. Needless to say, they did not repeat that behaviour, and it was in my view negligent, which they admit they were.
So , by what logic do people believe the Mccanns actions were acceptable ?
The video confirming
Sky ian woods interview 25 may 2007
VIDEO
At start of video 00.38
IW: This is a resort that offers childcare facilities, babysitting facilities. Why then were three young children left alone in the apartment while you were having a meal?
GERRY McCANN (GM): I mean; I think if you know the location here which you've seen, ah, what we did I think, and then we've been assured by the fact and the thousands of messages from people who've either done exactly the same or say they would have done the same, and for us, it really wasn't very much different to having dinner in your garden, in the proximity of the location. I think it's fair to say that you know the guilt that we feel having not been there at that moment irrespective of whether we had been in the other bedroom or not will never leave us.
181