Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?

[Mr Gray]

Yes.

My understanding of the PJ involvement is that it consists of 2 parts.  The first is the effort in Oporto.  I know only a little about this, but its focus seems to be outside Portugal.  The second is the effort on the Algarve, which despite the primacy quote is merely a unit to handle legitimate requests emanating from Operation Grange.

If I went to the PJ I would get hauled down to Portimão or Faro for a day in their company.  This would be the excruciating routine of questions in Portuguese, translated into English, response in English and typed up in Portuguese. 

Then what would happen to the information?  At best, it would get sent to OG, which I have already done.  At worst, it would get sent to Oporto, upon which I could get hauled to either Faro or Oporto.  Such jolly times.

And then when the case gets archived, my personal and contact details will get revealed for every aspiring journalist to see.

The information has already been communicated to the UK team.  I will not get invited to Belgravia.  And my personal details will not ever become public.

judging by your posts on here I have a good idea how your information has been received

[misty]

There's some very interesting comments on that site, do you believe all of them? The McCanns in Caplins and having to be brought back because of crying children, all the staff gossiping about them the morning after? No wonder they were offered a baby-sitter! If they were, of course. Silvia said nothing of that in her official statements. They knew there were baby-sitters, but preferred leaving the kids home alone.

No, I don't believe all of them. Vera from Essex was totally unreliable according to internet research.

[faithlilly]

Yes - I've always thought they were innocent Faith - not because I like them particularly,  but because  I have never found anything to make me think otherwise.

But you thought them innocent before you even knew what the police had and that's what I mean by blind faith. It wouldn't matter what evidence the police had or, indeed, if it had gone to trial. You would still have argued for their innocence. Be honest.

[Mr Gray]

But you thought them innocent before you even knew what the police had and that's what I mean by blind faith. It wouldn't matter what evidence the police had or, indeed, if it had gone to trial. You would still have argued for their innocence. Be honest.

this shows just how deluded some sceptics are....like Benice my opinions are based on evidence not blind faith

[ShiningInLuz]

judging by your posts on here I have a good idea how your information has been received

So, on a par with your regular form then.  Nothing constructive with a splash of goading.

[ShiningInLuz]

I don't believe that can be done on here as we'd be stopped because of "libel", even if we proposed it as a theory.

It can.  And I'm not proposing it as a theory.  I am proposing that Alfie's flawed logic permits such options.

[ShiningInLuz]

perhaps you could take your own advice and address the post... I challenged your assertion that there is no evidence that the mccanns are not suspects....you are wrong...there is

to say therefore I simply labellled your post as bizarre is also wrong...attention to detail....c minus must do better

Since you simply labelled the post and did not address its contents I can claim that you simply labelled the post and did not address it contents.

I see we have another splash of goading.  Can the supporters rise above this?

[Mr Gray]

So, on a par with your regular form then.  Nothing constructive with a splash of goading.

plenty in my other posts but it seems you choose to ignore them because you dont have any answers

[Mr Gray]

Since you simply labelled the post and did not address its contents I can claim that you simply labelled the post and did not address it contents.

I see we have another splash of goading.  Can the supporters rise above this?

#again you have claimed there is no evidence that SY do not consider the mccanns suspects....you seem to be delibrately avoiding engaging and not  actually addressing the issue.... i wonder why

[Alfie]

You didn't engage, Alfie. Taking a detailed post and simply labelling it as bizarre, a la Davel, is not engaging.

If you want to engage, you need to explain why your line of reasoning precludes the McCanns dunit, Oldfield dunnit, and the potential involvement of others in the Tapas 9.

No I don't need to preclude anything, I am simply demonstrating that abduction is both a logical and plausible theory, just as you have done on this forum previously.  You assertiing that I am somehow dobbing the McCanns in it  in my posts is utter horsehit, sorry if this sounds rude.

[slartibartfast]

judging by your posts on here I have a good idea how your information has been received

Same way as Sadie's?

[Alfie]

As you prefer not to answer I will assume you have realised that parents being in the Tapas does not mean their kids are home alone.

You obviously didn't read the post I wrote which answered your question.

[Mr Gray]

Same way as Sadie's?

so thats your opinion...

[Alfie]

It can.  And I'm not proposing it as a theory.  I am proposing that Alfie's flawed logic permits such options.

My logic is not flawed.

[Alice Purjorick]

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/kidnapper-spied-madeleine-mccann-police-1897649

If you have had a long hard day this will provide some light entertainment before you turn in.