Author Topic: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?  (Read 160874 times)

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #930 on: February 07, 2017, 11:57:57 AM »
No idea. I'm merely chipping in.

So do you think Gerry used the word 'jemmied' ?
No idea.  It's possible.  It's also possible he didn't and his exact words misreported.  I think this issue registers about a 1 on the richter scale of importance to the case, but people like you attach HUGE significance to it - why?

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #931 on: February 07, 2017, 11:58:54 AM »
why not  just use the word  closed?/shut etc??
Probably because the window was being reported as open.  *&*%£

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #932 on: February 07, 2017, 12:05:57 PM »
No idea.  It's possible.  It's also possible he didn't and his exact words misreported.  I think this issue registers about a 1 on the richter scale of importance to the case, but people like you attach HUGE significance to it - why?

You see Alfie dear chap that's where your mind-reading skills let you down again. I don't believe using the word jemmied is particularly important. Jemmied could simply mean forced. It's the fact that so many supporters vehemently deny he said it that interests me.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #933 on: February 07, 2017, 12:29:16 PM »
You see Alfie dear chap that's where your mind-reading skills let you down again. I don't believe using the word jemmied is particularly important. Jemmied could simply mean forced. It's the fact that so many supporters vehemently deny he said it that interests me.
Great, well that's progress at least but methinks you are being somewhat economical with the actualite Rodders me old mucker.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1170.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #934 on: February 07, 2017, 12:33:43 PM »
Faithlilly pretends that "jemmied shutters" is not all that significant to her, but on the thread I just linked to she wrote, in reference to the reporting of "jemmied shutters that :

Quote
The lie was a panicked reaction in order that their relatives didn't blame them for leaving the apartment insecure. It was never going to stand up to scrutiny, they knew that and that's why they never repeated the story in any of their statements. It was a holding device, nothing more. It does however show the McCanns as people who are willing to be dishonest if the situation warrants it, simply to save their own skins

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #935 on: February 07, 2017, 12:58:24 PM »
Faithlilly pretends that "jemmied shutters" is not all that significant to her, but on the thread I just linked to she wrote, in reference to the reporting of "jemmied shutters that :

I only see mention of jemmied shutters in your bit.
Are you trying to tell us something?.
Up the Clyde Valley the expression is more likely to have been "forced with a pinching bar".
Jemmied is a bit Sarf East and to be found in Peter Cheyney books in days of yore ( that may give a clue).
Whether it was a jemmy (jimmy if one is a Septic*), crow bar or pinching bar does not matter as according to the OC and cops, not to mention Clarence Mitchell, there was no sign of a break in so said jemmy,jimmy, crow bar or pinching bar remained resolutely out of sight to the point one doubts its existence.

*Septic Tank ...work it out for yourself  ?{)(**
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #936 on: February 07, 2017, 01:03:57 PM »
Faithlilly pretends that "jemmied shutters" is not all that significant to her, but on the thread I just linked to she wrote, in reference to the reporting of "jemmied shutters that :

Thank you for reminder Alfie. So the 'jemmied' claim was important in the context of the family's reaction to an unsecured apartment but not in the context of the investigation as a whole. It was the couple's claim of an open window that was important not how it got that way.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #937 on: February 07, 2017, 01:37:39 PM »
Thank you for reminder Alfie. So the 'jemmied' claim was important in the context of the family's reaction to an unsecured apartment but not in the context of the investigation as a whole. It was the couple's claim of an open window that was important not how it got that way.
So it was important but not important, I see.... *&*%£

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #938 on: February 07, 2017, 02:05:02 PM »
So it was important but not important, I see.... *&*%£

It reduced the impact of leaving the children home alone and added credence to the abduction story when repeated to the press, I suppose.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #939 on: February 07, 2017, 02:18:25 PM »
It reduced the impact of leaving the children home alone and added credence to the abduction story when repeated to the press, I suppose.

Gilbert and Sullivan The Mikado.
A favourite of Slarti's and mine:

"Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative".
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #940 on: February 07, 2017, 06:11:54 PM »
Gilbert and Sullivan The Mikado.
A favourite of Slarti's and mine:

"Merely corroborative detail, intended to give artistic verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative".

Make a good subtitle for a book.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #941 on: February 07, 2017, 06:45:31 PM »
It reduced the impact of leaving the children home alone and added credence to the abduction story when repeated to the press, I suppose.
So that's why Gerry McCann told the press the window had been jemmied...oh wait, he didn't did he?  But on the night of the 3rd May he knew in advance that if he used the word "jemmied" in a frantic phone conversation with his nearest and dearest back home that they'd be sure to use that exact same word later in the news interviews that he knew would inevitably be reported in the world's press.  Yes, all makes perfect sense now.   @)(++(*

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #942 on: February 07, 2017, 06:57:08 PM »
So that's why Gerry McCann told the press the window had been jemmied...oh wait, he didn't did he?  But on the night of the 3rd May he knew in advance that if he used the word "jemmied" in a frantic phone conversation with his nearest and dearest back home that they'd be sure to use that exact same word later in the news interviews that he knew would inevitably be reported in the world's press.  Yes, all makes perfect sense now.   @)(++(*

Only to you Alfie. I see it more as an unintended consequence. A 'lucky break' if you like.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #943 on: February 07, 2017, 06:58:51 PM »
Only to you Alfie. I see it more as an unintended consequence. A 'lucky break' if you like.
So basically what you're now saying is that the use of the word "jemmied" was not chosen with any deliberate intention to deceive then?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there a plausible, logical theory of abduction?
« Reply #944 on: February 07, 2017, 08:27:43 PM »
So basically what you're now saying is that the use of the word "jemmied" was not chosen with any deliberate intention to deceive then?

Not unless you can suggest a reason why the McCanns would want to deceive their friends and relatives.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0