Gerry and Kate's reaction to sniffer dogs didnt make sense new ninemsn article

[Robittybob1]

That is what you would like the world to believe.

Trouble is, the dogs indications don't go away.

Yes and what do they tell you?

[Robittybob1]

i  think our australian media are being very brave publishing all this it is good  imo

I think the editor or reporter needs to spend a month on the forum before attempting to hash an article on the McCanns.  It was worse than reading Wikipedia.

[carlymichelle]

the thing is our australian media are not emotionally involved like the uk media/supporters it shows too doesnt it

[Eleanor]

the thing is our australian media are not emotionally involved like the uk media/supporters it shows too doesnt it

It shows a load of rehashed rubbish.

Is there not an existing Thread to which this article could have been added?

[Mr Gray]

That is what you would like the world to believe.

Trouble is, the dogs indications don't go away.

and what do the indications tell us?

[Robittybob1]

the thing is our australia media are not emotionally involved  like the  uk media/supporters it shows too doesnt  it

You must admit it is more exciting on the UK Justice forum.  That article was really boring IMO.

and what do the indications tell us?

Seems like the same question I asked?

[stephen25000]

and what do the indications tell us?

They possibly indicated the presence of a body.

As you well know.

Neither corroborated or dismissed.

[Mr Gray]

They possibly indicated the presence of a body.

As you well know.

Neither corroborated or dismissed.

so it is possible there was a body in 5a.....but no confirmation...no evidence of a body in 5a

what use is that

[Alfie]

Was the reporter there when the McCanns were told about the dog alerts?  Was Pat Brown?  If so perhaps they can describe exactly how they reacted.  Did they laugh?  Did they sneer?  Did they act in shocked disbelief?  Let's hear all about it.

[Robittybob1]

They possibly indicated the presence of a body.

As you well know.

Neither corroborated or dismissed.

Yes you are right - They possibly indicated the presence of an unnamed, uncorroborated body.

[stephen25000]

so it is possible there was a body in 5a.....but no confirmation...no evidence of a body in 5a

what use is that

The only tangible thing in this case.

[Mr Gray]

The only tangible thing in this case.

it isnt tangible....LOL

[carlymichelle]

before    it gets derailed      lets get back to  the topic? wouldnt most parents reaction to  dogs alerting to  Dna be of  shock and fear ? not  saying the dogs are  wrong  like the mcanns  did  or  telling everybody they can that the dogs had no  meaning etc? i do find that strange  ??

[stephen25000]

before    it gets derailed      lets get back to  the topic? wouldnt most parents reaction to  dogs alerting to  Dna be of  shock and fear ? not  saying the dogs are  wrong  like the mcanns  did  or  telling everybody they can that the dogs had no  meaning etc? i do find that strange  ??

Indeed Carly, it would.

Remember when Mccann tried to introduce the dogs indications in the Portuguese Trial , and the Judge had none of it.

Now, if the indications were of no concern, then why did he try to bring it into the case ? &%+((£

[Robittybob1]

before    it gets derailed      lets get back to  the topic? wouldnt most parents reaction to  dogs alerting to  Dna be of  shock and fear ? not  saying the dogs are  wrong  like the mcanns  did  or  telling everybody they can that the dogs had no  meaning etc? i do find that strange  ??

Unless you are like the McCanns knowing that Madeleine had not died so the cadaver odour could not have been from her.

Indeed Carly, it would.

Remember when Mccann tried to introduce the dogs indications in the Portuguese Trial , and the Judge had none of it.

Now, if the indications were of no concern, then why did he try to bring it into the case ? &%+((£

He wasn't allowed to finish the sentence so we will never know what Gerry was wanting to say about the dogs.