The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?

[Nicholas]

Yet more blatant hypocrisy from David on blue:

He states:"I try not to point fingers without anything concrete. The situation with Julie is different, It can be established she lied via closely scrutinizing her evidence. She lied, no doubts about it.
As for the sound moderator I don't think its possible to establish who did what if anything, It can only be narrowed down to a group of possible conspirators. It would be rather hypocritical to do to them what they done to Jeremy ie assume guilt and make accusations.
Somebody made those scratches on the AGA thats for sure.
As for the blood in the silencer. They could ironically use the very same defence that JB did. (the blood was a mixture of Junes and Nevills) Anyway blaming people is something that should be done after a conviction is overturned. Doing such things prior can be counter productuve http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9402.msg438077.html#msg438077

[Holly Goodhead]

I wonder if David's medication is to curtail hallucinations:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9397.msg437919.html#msg437919

"No problem Mike. 

I take medications myself. But I stay away from Alcohol.

Whenever I need a boost I watch and listen to motivational videos like this one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW3eatIipjg

Gets me really pumped up"

This might explain his FEB and thinking he can see a difference in LM/RM between June and SC along with defence wounds to adult victims and bloodstains to SC's feet all of which went unnoticed by police and pathologists.

[Nicholas]

Here's what Trudi Benjamin retweeted on 26th April 2018

"Report by DCI Kenneally on 06.09.85: This report has never been disclosed and is important as it concluded all the evidence suggested Sheila Caffell killed the family. Not her brother #JeremyBamber who was told he will spend the rest of his live in prison: (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter

https://mobile.twitter.com/tru68?lang=en

[Angelo222]

Here's what Trudi Benjamin retweeted on 26th April 2018

"Report by DCI Kenneally on 06.09.85: This report has never been disclosed and is important as it concluded all the evidence suggested Sheila Caffell killed the family. Not her brother #JeremyBamber who was told he will spend the rest of his live in prison: (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter

https://mobile.twitter.com/tru68?lang=en

Thanks for posting that Stephanie as Trudi Benjamin has blocked me being the coward she is.

[Holly Goodhead]

Here's what Trudi Benjamin retweeted on 26th April 2018

"Report by DCI Kenneally on 06.09.85: This report has never been disclosed and is important as it concluded all the evidence suggested Sheila Caffell killed the family. Not her brother #JeremyBamber who was told he will spend the rest of his live in prison: (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter

https://mobile.twitter.com/tru68?lang=en

See post #3

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9223.msg449459#msg449459

[Nicholas]

Thanks for posting that Stephanie as Trudi Benjamin has blocked me being the coward she is.

Interesting she's blocked you Angelo222

[Caroline]

Here's what Trudi Benjamin retweeted on 26th April 2018

"Report by DCI Kenneally on 06.09.85: This report has never been disclosed and is important as it concluded all the evidence suggested Sheila Caffell killed the family. Not her brother #JeremyBamber who was told he will spend the rest of his live in prison: (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter

https://mobile.twitter.com/tru68?lang=en

She is right, the report did conclude that - however, it was before Julie came forward and before forensic tests were returned. If the police wanted to frame Bamber, surely they would have roped Kenneally in on the act and had the report exonerate Sheila?

[Nicholas]

Thanks for posting that Stephanie as Trudi Benjamin has blocked me being the coward she is.

I remember that awful feeling of paranoia when I campaigned. Bamber will most probably have them thinking all sorts, when in reality him and his claims are insignificant.

Trudi Benjamin appears to be retweeting the same old false and misleading BS.

"Call logs of telephone calls made to PC 1990 West: They are a contemporaneous log of phone calls received by police on the night of the tragedies. This evidence is of the utmost importance and we need manuscript copies for forensic analysis (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter #JeremyBamber

Same applies to the other Bamber Twitter feeds.

There's nothing new! Just more lies!

[Nicholas]

She is right, the report did conclude that - however, it was before Julie came forward and before forensic tests were returned. If the police wanted to frame Bamber, surely they would have roped Kenneally in on the act and had the report exonerate Sheila?

Trudi is not right though Caroline. We all know the police initially believed Sheila was responsible. We know Julie eventually came forward.

Trudi is attempting to go back to the beginning in order to show an innocent Bamber. As you pointed out; this cannot erase what has gone on since. I'm repeating what you posted recently.

Trudi is attempting to mislead

"Report by DCI Kenneally on 06.09.85: This report has never been disclosed and is important as it concluded all the evidence suggested Sheila Caffell killed the family. Not her brother #JeremyBamber who was told he will spend the rest of his live in prison: (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter

It's deceptive

Why should the report be disclosed? So that Bamber can play his games for another 3 decades?

Wrong case to push for disclosure on IMO. There's nothing withheld that will help Bamber. All it is doing is giving him more time to carry on his charade.

[Caroline]

Trudi is not right though Caroline. We all know the police initially believed Sheila was responsible. We know Julie eventually came forward.

Trudi is attempting to go back to the beginning in order to show an innocent Bamber. As you pointed out; this cannot erase what has gone on since. I'm repeating what you posted recently.

Trudi is attempting to mislead

"Report by DCI Kenneally on 06.09.85: This report has never been disclosed and is important as it concluded all the evidence suggested Sheila Caffell killed the family. Not her brother #JeremyBamber who was told he will spend the rest of his live in prison: (link: http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter) jeremy-bamber.co.uk/open-letter

It's deceptive

Why should the report be disclosed? So that Bamber can play his games for another 3 decades?

Wrong case to push for disclosure on IMO. There's nothing withheld that will help Bamber. All it is doing is giving him more time to carry on his charade.

She is right about Kenneally's conclusions, but as I said, this is before Julie Mugford came forward and the results of various tests were compiled. The reason it's never been fully disclosed is presumably because it is no longer relevant given that it was complied before further evidence was obtained.

After complaints from RWB to ACC Simpson,  ACS Mike Ainsley (the very people that Roch and others believe to be at the heart of the conspiracy), instructed Kenneally to compile said report - his conclusions were murder/suicide and that Sheila was responsible. This was after RWB made his complaint but before Julie came forward. If these top brass were intending on framing Bamber (for whatever reason) then why instruct the report in the first place but having done so, it would have been the perfect opportunity to make sure the results of said report implicated Bamber. That's not what happened and it doesn't make sense for them to leak such conclusions and then change tack after Julie made her statement - it makes them look like fools, which is why the investigation was criticised.

[Nicholas]

She is right about Kenneally's conclusions, but as I said, this is before Julie Mugford came forward and the results of various tests were compiled. The reason it's never been fully disclosed is presumably because it is no longer relevant given that it was complied before further evidence was obtained.

I hear what you are saying but the retweet reads to me as though Trudi and co think the Kenneally report is going to contain within it proof Bamber is innocent.

We KNOW it will say no such thing.

Do you think she is knowingly misleading people or do you think she cannot see the wood through the trees?

Do you think she's not realised this was made BEFORE Julie came forward and the results of various tests were compiled?

[Nicholas]

After complaints from RWB to ACC Simpson,  ACS Mike Ainsley (the very people that Roch and others believe to be at the heart of the conspiracy), instructed Kenneally to compile said report - his conclusions were murder/suicide and that Sheila was responsible. This was after RWB made his complaint but before Julie came forward. If these top brass were intending on framing Bamber (for whatever reason) then why instruct the report in the first place but having done so, it would have been the perfect opportunity to make sure the results of said report implicated Bamber. That's not what happened and it doesn't make sense for them to leak such conclusions and then change tack after Julie made her statement - it makes them look like fools, which is why the investigation was criticised.

It's been clear to me for a very long time that Roch and people like him really don't have a full grasp of this case. Roch has allowed his conspiracy theories to cloud his judgement, presuming of course his judgement wasn't clouded before he became interested in the Bamber case? That's a debate for another time.

[Nicholas]

She is right about Kenneally's conclusions, but as I said, this is before Julie Mugford came forward and the results of various tests were compiled. The reason it's never been fully disclosed is presumably because it is no longer relevant given that it was complied before further evidence was obtained.

After complaints from RWB to ACC Simpson,  ACS Mike Ainsley (the very people that Roch and others believe to be at the heart of the conspiracy), instructed Kenneally to compile said report - his conclusions were murder/suicide and that Sheila was responsible. This was after RWB made his complaint but before Julie came forward. If these top brass were intending on framing Bamber (for whatever reason) then why instruct the report in the first place but having done so, it would have been the perfect opportunity to make sure the results of said report implicated Bamber. That's not what happened and it doesn't make sense for them to leak such conclusions and then change tack after Julie made her statement - it makes them look like fools, which is why the investigation was criticised.

Great post btw Caroline but will the supporters listen to reason; that is the question?

[Caroline]

Great post btw Caroline but will the supporters listen to reason; that is the question?

Thanks Steph!

When the bear no longer sh*ts in the woods and the Pope converts to Jediism - maybe then, but only 'maybe' 

[APRIL]

Thanks Steph!

When the bear no longer sh*ts in the woods and the Pope converts to Jediism - maybe then, but only 'maybe' 

There's an addy on the telly which shows bears using loo paper. Conversion MIGHT be closer than you think?