Author Topic: Questions about the relatives and their involvement with the silencer:  (Read 10006 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

As I said I think it is possible two frames existed.  Initially an attempt to demonstrate the silencer was used and put away.  The idea at that time was possibly to show it had been attached when NB sustained a beating hence the paint and hair.  Blood tests on the outside were inconclusive.  It's unclear (to me) when victims' blood samples were handed over to EP.  If EP were still in possession of them when the silencer went to FSS on 13th Aug then it may have been NB's blood on the outside.  If EP knew it wasn't possible to type such a small sample they may have added anyone's blood.

The flake found inside the silencer wasn't identified until 12th Sept.  This was sophisticated for the time and if fabricated involved person(s) forensically aware.  Difficult to see how this didn't involve the lab.  I would suggest a senior member of EP, DCI level or higher and a senior manager at FSS along with a practitioner.  Obviously this was all done on the basis all concerned believed JB guilty aka noble cause corruption.

The notion that the extended family were involved in any frame is simply too silly to be even considered likely.  Its one thing to take some commercial advantage from the murders but quite another to involve oneself in attempting to pervert the course of justice in a mass murder investigation.  I think the straw grasping has become just a tad illogical.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Holly Goodhead

The notion that the extended family were involved in any frame is simply too silly to be even considered likely.  Its one thing to take some commercial advantage from the murders but quite another to involve oneself in attempting to pervert the course of justice in a mass murder investigation.  I think the straw grasping has become just a tad illogical.

I agree it does seem unbelievable. 

John what do you make of the fact AE didn't include the finding of the silencer on 10th Aug in her WS of 14th Aug?

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=7561.msg382195#msg382195
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Looking at the answers and other posters unable to answer the relatives & Stan Jones questions, it can be concluded it was impossible for either to frame Bamber single handedly.

Only two conclusions can be reached -

Stan Jones & the relstives worked together in the frame:

Stan Jones attempting a solo frame, still needed the relatives to lie in their witness statements and say they found the silencer.

The relatives didn't have Sheila's blood or enough crime scene information to individually frame Bamber.


Neither Stan Jones or the relatives framed Bamber:

The silencer was found by the relatives with blood, paint and a white hair. After tests it came back as human & Sheila's blood and the aga paint. There was no fabricating.

No, not necessarily so.

Adam have you considered the following:

- The blood found on the outside of the silencer, paint and hair on 10th Aug might have been totally separate from the blood found inside the silencer on 12th Sep.  By this I mean the person(s) involved in any fabrication and objectives of such may have been completely different:

  - Blood on the outside, paint and hair may have been fabricated to advance the idea the silencer was attached when NB sustained a beating in the kitchen which if true would point away from SC and towards JB.  A low ranking officer at DS level may have been responsible for this.  When the silencer was first analysed at lab on 13th Aug the blood on the outside wasn't capable of being grouped.  If this 'evidence' was subsequently put to senior officers etc they may have said it was incapable of getting the case to court:  Blood inconclusive.  Scratch could have happened any time.  Grey hair lost in transit.  All pretty meaningless.  Would a jury convict on this?  Probably not even if it got to court.  At this stage the inside of the silencer may not have been fabricated (if that is what happened) and  'drawback' may not even have been considered. 

- You said if the silencer was fabricated the relatives and police needed to work together but this isn't necessarily so.  The silencer loomed large in the minds of the relatives from the off.  They repeated this info to EP during the very early stages of the investigation: 7th, 8th and 9th Aug.  On 8th Aug JB was asked to complete another WS explaining the silencer/scope.  The same day AP phoned EP re scope/silencer.  Later on 8th Aug Dr Vanezis attended a meeting at WHF where DS Jones was in attendance and apparently he was the only dissenter from the murder/suicide theory.  On 9th Aug morning the relatives attended a meeting at EP offices with DCI Jones and DS Jones where once again the silencer and scope were homed in on.  Later the same day DCI Jones and DS Jones handed the keys over to the Eatons and went over the new alarm system with them.  It is possible then that DS Jones single handedly fabricated the silencer by re-entering WHF at some stage leaving a nice surprise for the relatives!  The property obviously couldn't be bolted from within.  DS Jones had access to the alarm code and the key for the new door which at some stage he might have copied or taken a cast of to get cut later.  Or he may have entered via a window, turned the alarm off, left the silencer and then out the door.  Or this may have happened prior to the alarm fitted. 

In the Killing Mum and Dad vid DS Jones states 'knowing he'd committed all these murders' and 'just had to pray something else would turn up'. @ 26 min in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcTvqLk0MWU

To my mind DS Jones seems a complete liability.  He didn't know JB had committed the murders.  There's a big difference between knowing something and having a hunch.  All the talk about going through hell and leading a double life.  And what made him think he knew more than his senior officers who he reported to?  Dr Vanezis said DS Jones offered nothing of evidential value it was all based on JB's reactions.

DS Jones took centre stage during all aspects of the investigation:

- At soc/WHF on 7th Aug
- Took JB's WS's on 7th Aug followed by a drinking session
- Took further WS from JB on 8th Aug
- Attended mtg with Dr Vanezis at WHF on 8th Aug
- Attended mtg with relatives at EP offices on 9th Aug where DCI Jones became irrate with AE 'stop writing'  8()(((@#  @)(++(*
- Collected silencer from relatives alone followed by a drinking session.
- Collected paint sample from Aga along with DI's Cook and Miller followed by a drinking session
- Took all JM's WS's
     
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline steve_trousers

Again it's stretching the bounds of credulity to suggest a police officer set out to deliberately pervert the course of justice, against the advice of his seniors, thereby risking his career, reputation and pension in order to frame an innocent man just because of a hunch. Only for the naive and gullible I'm afraid.

And why would Ann Eaton mention the silencer in a written statement where she was only writing about Sheila.



Offline Holly Goodhead

Again it's stretching the bounds of credulity to suggest a police officer set out to deliberately pervert the course of justice, against the advice of his seniors, thereby risking his career, reputation and pension in order to frame an innocent man just because of a hunch. Only for the naive and gullible I'm afraid.

And why would Ann Eaton mention the silencer in a written statement where she was only writing about Sheila.

I am afraid police wrongdoing does happen Steve.  More so during the 80's before PACE.  If police officers were deterred from wrongdoing by loss of careers, reputations, pensions etc then I guess we wouldn't have police wrongdoing or not on the scale we have witnessed.   

You can listen to DS Jones in the link I posted above.  He claims he knew JB was guilty and had to pray something would turn up.   

Why would EP not keep a complete audit trail of a blood stained exhibit found at the soc?  An exhibit which was an accessory to the firearm used in a major incident whereby 5 people died.  At best this is too sloppy for words.       
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline steve_trousers

Police wrong doing does happen, yes. We are lucky in this country that we have the best and most professional police service in the world and thankfully corruption is rare.

But again this is drawing us back into the realms of a conspiracy theory in order to frame an innocent man of murder. Even honest police officers have to rely on hunches to solve crimes, and to suggest that there is some conspiracy flies in the face of the overwhelming mountain of forensic, physical and circumstantial evidence that proves otherwise is grasping at straws.

And you can't compare actual miscarriages of justice such as the Birmingham 6 and Stefan Kiszko with this case.

Offline Myster

I am afraid police wrongdoing does happen Steve.  More so during the 80's before PACE.  If police officers were deterred from wrongdoing by loss of careers, reputations, pensions etc then I guess we wouldn't have police wrongdoing or not on the scale we have witnessed.   

You can listen to DS Jones in the link I posted above.  He claims he knew JB was guilty and had to pray something would turn up.   

Why would EP not keep a complete audit trail of a blood stained exhibit found at the soc?  An exhibit which was an accessory to the firearm used in a major incident whereby 5 people died.  At best this is too sloppy for words.     

"To my mind DS Jones seems a complete liability.  He didn't know JB had committed the murders.  There's a big difference between knowing something and having a hunch.  All the talk about going through hell and leading a double life.  And what made him think he knew more than his senior officers who he reported to?  Dr Vanezis said DS Jones offered nothing of evidential value it was all based on JB's reactions"

 8()(((@# &%&£(+

Stan Jones was a genuine copper and the shining star of the investigation, who knew in his heart that Bamber had done it. Why on earth would SJ risk demotion or even worse by refusing to tow the Taff Jones line if he didn't truly believe he was guilty?

https://youtu.be/bcTvqLk0MWU?t=26m30s

Many crimes are solved on hunches. Take Tracie Andrews for example... detectives must have realised that there was something fishy about her phony road-rage story, so they put her in the press hot seat to see if she'd crack under questioning. But Andrews, like Bamber, was so hard-faced she thought she'd get away with it.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Police wrong doing does happen, yes. We are lucky in this country that we have the best and most professional police service in the world and thankfully corruption is rare.

But again this is drawing us back into the realms of a conspiracy theory in order to frame an innocent man of murder. Even honest police officers have to rely on hunches to solve crimes, and to suggest that there is some conspiracy flies in the face of the overwhelming mountain of forensic, physical and circumstantial evidence that proves otherwise is grasping at straws.

And you can't compare actual miscarriages of justice such as the Birmingham 6 and Stefan Kiszko with this case.

According to the Met's website for 2017:

1 Referral to IPCC
5 Dismissals
1 Misconduct warning
3 Convictions

The above is the Met only for the first 5 months of the year. 

http://news.met.police.uk/latest_news/tag/misconduct

I could go on and on Steve:

https://www.herts.police.uk/pdf/misconduct_hearings_april_2016_september_2016.pd

Nothing wrong with hunches so long as they are then supported by strong evidence. What can happen is that officers have hunches and then go about fabricating evidence to support the hunch.   
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

"To my mind DS Jones seems a complete liability.  He didn't know JB had committed the murders.  There's a big difference between knowing something and having a hunch.  All the talk about going through hell and leading a double life.  And what made him think he knew more than his senior officers who he reported to?  Dr Vanezis said DS Jones offered nothing of evidential value it was all based on JB's reactions"

 8()(((@# &%&£(+

Stan Jones was a genuine copper and the shining star of the investigation, who knew in his heart that Bamber had done it. Why on earth would SJ risk demotion or even worse by refusing to tow the Taff Jones line if he didn't truly believe he was guilty?

https://youtu.be/bcTvqLk0MWU?t=26m30s

Many crimes are solved on hunches. Take Tracie Andrews for example... detectives must have realised that there was something fishy about her phony road-rage story, so they put her in the press hot seat to see if she'd crack under questioning. But Andrews, like Bamber, was so hard-faced she thought she'd get away with it.

DS Jones truly believing JB guilty doesn't make it so.  How many mass shooting did DS Jones have experience of?  This case is about complex forensics: ballistics, pathology of gunshot wounds and blood pattern analysis.  All of which were way beyond even the expert witnesses let alone any member of EP. 


 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline steve_trousers

Nothing wrong with hunches so long as they are then supported by strong evidence. What can happen is that officers have hunches and then go about fabricating evidence to support the hunch.

Lest us forget, this hunch was supported by an overwhelming mountain of evidence proving Jeremy was the perpetrator.

With respect to you I think it's below the belt to accuse an honest, down to earth good bloke like Stan Jones of corruption in order to fit a square peg into your round hole.

This is straight from the Mike Tesko school of justice for Jeremy Bamber

 

Offline Holly Goodhead

According to the Met's website for 2017:

1 Referral to IPCC
5 Dismissals
1 Misconduct warning
3 Convictions

The above is the Met only for the first 5 months of the year. 

http://news.met.police.uk/latest_news/tag/misconduct

I could go on and on Steve:

https://www.herts.police.uk/pdf/misconduct_hearings_april_2016_september_2016.pd

Nothing wrong with hunches so long as they are then supported by strong evidence. What can happen is that officers have hunches and then go about fabricating evidence to support the hunch.

The above link isn't working so here's the pdf
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline steve_trousers

DS Jones truly believing JB guilty doesn't make it so.  How many mass shooting did DS Jones have experience of?  This case is about complex forensics: ballistics, pathology of gunshot wounds and blood pattern analysis.  All of which were way beyond even the expert witnesses let alone any member of EP.

No,, but the mountain of evidence does. And you are continually ignoring it.

Offline Holly Goodhead

No,, but the mountain of evidence does. And you are continually ignoring it.

What "mountain of evidence" are you referring to? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline steve_trousers

Sorry, It's all here but the innocent camp choose to ignore it:

http://www.homepage-link.to/justice/judgements/Bamber/index.html

Offline Holly Goodhead

Lest us forget, this hunch was supported by an overwhelming mountain of evidence proving Jeremy was the perpetrator.

With respect to you I think it's below the belt to accuse an honest, down to earth good bloke like Stan Jones of corruption in order to fit a square peg into your round hole.

This is straight from the Mike Tesko school of justice for Jeremy Bamber

Adam said the silencer could only have been fabricated if the police (DS Jones) and the relatives worked together.  I showed this wasn't necessarily so.

I haven't said DS Jones or anyone fabricated the silencer.  I refer you to my responses to Adam's questions:

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8234.msg408103#msg408103

 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?