Was it not suspicious that the farmhouse windows were closed on an August night?

[John]

Actually, on reflection, other than what we know from Pam -because she spoke with both June and Sheila when she phoned- EVERYTHING we know of the circumstances, comes directly, or indirectly, from Jeremy.

The crime scene reveals a lot of what happened but the when and in which order events occurred will remain a partial mystery.

[Holly Goodhead]

Actually, on reflection, other than what we know from Pam -because she spoke with both June and Sheila when she phoned- EVERYTHING we know of the circumstances, comes directly, or indirectly, from Jeremy.

This is why it's important to move along and consider the physical evidence at soc which JB had little or no control over:

- Blood stains
- Casings
- Distance of shots
- Pathological evidence
- Psychiatric evidence pertaining to June and SC
- Trajectories of gsw's
- Wound tracks

[Holly Goodhead]

The crime scene reveals a lot of what happened but the when and in which order events occurred will remain a partial mystery.

Yes when evidence is collected, documented and processed properly.

[Holly Goodhead]

There is no reason why Bamber would enter WHF through an upstairs window. It would be more difficult & he would only have to go straight downstairs to get the rifle.

Weren't all of the upstairs bedrooms occupied that night ? If not, it's still more likely he would wake people who were upstairs.

The bathroom window was loose or had even been left ajar by Bamber at supper.

According to Wilkes the prosecution visited WHF but the defence didn't. 

At the very least the defence should have visited WHF to check out the window(s). 

Was the window removed in its entirety to use as a court exhibit?  No.  Why not?

Were jurors taken to WHF to check the window(s)?  No.  Why not?