General discussion about the latest news (not search related)

[stephen25000]

From the Daily Star.

....and just when you think the tabloid press can't be any more stupid.



http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/607816/how-old-is-Madeleine-McCann-now-missing-look-like-teenager-13-years-old-update-2017

[ferryman]

It's good to see that the wandered off and met with some sort of accident theory is very much alive and well.

Not according to Colin Sutton.

[Mr Gray]

sutton may be critical of the current SY investigation.

[Robittybob1]

From the Daily Star.

....and just when you think the tabloid press can't be any more stupid.



http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/607816/how-old-is-Madeleine-McCann-now-missing-look-like-teenager-13-years-old-update-2017

And what was wrong with that?

[stephen25000]

And what was wrong with that?

Do you get out much Rob ?

You could always ask Marty McFly.

[Robittybob1]

Do you get out much Rob ?

You could always ask Marty McFly.

The ears and the eyes stay constant.

[Brietta]

Mr Sutton makes a pertinent point echoing opinion expressed by other police professionals that the investigation concentrated far too much on one specific line of inquiry for too long.
Rather than keeping all options open they allowed themselves to get bogged down investigating the parents possibly missing other opportunities.

Quote
He said those closest to Maddie, including her parents, would have been the first line of inquiry for police. But he added he believed Portuguese police appeared make this their only line of investigation early on in the probe.

He said: 'By concentrating just on that scenario they may have missed tips or other lines that meant going down a completely different investigation route.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4435038/Did-Madeleine-McCann-wander-accident.html#ixzz4ezFjPZug

[stephen25000]

Mr Sutton makes a pertinent point echoing opinion expressed by other police professionals that the investigation concentrated far too much on one specific line of inquiry for too long.
Rather than keeping all options open they allowed themselves to get bogged down investigating the parents possibly missing other opportunities.

Quote
He said those closest to Maddie, including her parents, would have been the first line of inquiry for police. But he added he believed Portuguese police appeared make this their only line of investigation early on in the probe.

He said: 'By concentrating just on that scenario they may have missed tips or other lines that meant going down a completely different investigation route.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4435038/Did-Madeleine-McCann-wander-accident.html#ixzz4ezFjPZug

Indeed, there has been far too much concentration on abduction, despite the lack of evidence to support it.

[Brietta]

Indeed, there has been far too much concentration on abduction, despite the lack of evidence to support it.

There is a lack of evidence available to support any possible scenario of what happened to Madeleine McCann.
Yet another police professional has indicated this may very well be that the police overlooked it while being distracted by concentrating solely on a particular theory.

By taking that route they went a long way to prove the adage that the way to solve a crime is to follow the evidence; not by trying to fit the evidence to the crime.

[Mr Gray]

Indeed, there has been far too much concentration on abduction, despite the lack of evidence to support it.

what he says is that if the parents are ruled out then abduction is the most likely scenario........which you may remember is what i have been saying for a couple of years

[stephen25000]

There is a lack of evidence available to support any possible scenario of what happened to Madeleine McCann.
Yet another police professional has indicated this may very well be that the police overlooked it while being distracted by concentrating solely on a particular theory.

By taking that route they went a long way to prove the adage that the way to solve a crime is to follow the evidence; not by trying to fit the evidence to the crime.

I'm glad you seem to have realized that.

A lack of evidence on all the scenarios.

[stephen25000]

what he says is that if the parents are ruled out then abduction is the most likely scenario........which you may remember is what i have been saying for a couple of years

You can believe what you like.

There is absolutely nothing to place abduction above any other possibility.

You don't appear to have grasped that yet.

[Mr Gray]

what he says is that if the parents are ruled out then abduction is the most likely scenario........which you may remember is what i have been saying for a couple of years

You can believe what you like.

There is absolutely nothing to place abduction above any other possibility.

You don't appear to have grasped that yet.

you need to look at the evidence and you will find there is

[stephen25000]

you need to look at the evidence and you will find there is

Dream a little dream..........

[G-Unit]

There is a lack of evidence available to support any possible scenario of what happened to Madeleine McCann.
Yet another police professional has indicated this may very well be that the police overlooked it while being distracted by concentrating solely on a particular theory.

By taking that route they went a long way to prove the adage that the way to solve a crime is to follow the evidence; not by trying to fit the evidence to the crime.

The PJ spent a lot more effort investigating Murat than the McCanns. He was still of interest when Grime and his dogs were brought in, hence the search of his house and various vehicles.