LOL - I am not smearing anyone. It is M. Grime's assertions about his dog's abilities not mine that I am using to make a point. I fully accept that what he tells us about his dogs skills are true. You are shooting the messenger.
Either you believe Martin Grime's claims about his dogs skills or you don't. I believe him - therefore it must be for some other reason why the dogs did not alert in any of the 9 other cars or any of the other apartments. - where common sense alone dictates that alerts would have been made - if they had been given long enough.
IMO it was pointless to even include other cars and other apartments in this test unless the dogs were given the same chance to find a scent in those places as they were given in 5A and the Renault. That didn't happen.
So we circle back to the oft repeated insinuations about the handling of the dog.........
in effect that given enough time and / or cuing, the dog will alert eventually anywhere the handler consciously or unconsciously wants him to.
......whilst at the same time, he`s apparently cleverly "negative cuing" to prevent any alerts to residues of pork products, lavatories, bathrooms, bins and ovens............ or historical splodges of this that or the other ........
.............which I posted in the first place.