Author Topic: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)  (Read 725678 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2325 on: February 26, 2017, 11:58:39 PM »
Katie Hopkins supports the abduction theory but is still considered a champion by many McCann sceptics. Never mind, as long as she is slagging off the parents who cares?!

I think the woman is confused.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline G-Unit

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2326 on: February 27, 2017, 06:37:21 AM »
I think the woman is confused.

I think she's restricted in what she's allowed to say, as is anyone speaking via the media, it seems.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2327 on: February 27, 2017, 08:48:14 AM »
I think she's restricted in what she's allowed to say, as is anyone speaking via the media, it seems.

The law against libel seems to impose restrictions on freedom of speech ... funny that  8(0(*
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline G-Unit

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2328 on: February 27, 2017, 09:25:28 AM »
The law against libel seems to impose restrictions on freedom of speech ... funny that  8(0(*

If indeed it is the law against libel which is restricting what people can say.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2329 on: February 27, 2017, 10:23:06 AM »
If indeed it is the law against libel which is restricting what people can say.

Put in the simplest terms ... it is an offence in most of the civilised world to print lies about an individual or individuals. If you wish to avoid restrictions such as that I suggest you try moving to Portugal and learn the language.

Do be careful not to criticise those members of the establishment in public office in any way though or you may find yourself doing serious jail time as a consequence.

One law for the rich etc ...

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2330 on: February 27, 2017, 11:11:40 AM »
Put in the simplest terms ... it is an offence in most of the civilised world to print lies about an individual or individuals. If you wish to avoid restrictions such as that I suggest you try moving to Portugal and learn the language.

Do be careful not to criticise those members of the establishment in public office in any way though or you may find yourself doing serious jail time as a consequence.

One law for the rich etc ...
I would suggest G-Unit does not.  We appear to be hacking over the appeal court judgement again, and that, put simply, said that the publication of McCann theory of abduction (without proof) meant Amaral's alternative (without proof) could be published, and that in the main, it reflected the interim report.

Criticising members of the establishment in public office is treated in the main in a similar manner in Portugal and the UK.  If it defames, it is a civil offence, not criminal, so jail time is zero.  The difference in Portugal is that if it is someone in public office (and other cases) that is defamed, the financial penalty is increased by 50%.

The only instance I am personally aware of is a woman who defamed two GNR officers by getting her facts wrong and putting that on social media.  GNR officers are hardly "the rich", but the rules are simple.  Defame GNR officers and the financial penalty will be increased by 50%.

This tends to mean that people in general and the media in particular are careful to make sure their allegations are backed by solid evidence.  Personally, I prefer that to what appears to be a much more loose and sloppy approach in the UK.
What's up, old man?

Offline G-Unit

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2331 on: February 27, 2017, 11:31:50 AM »
Put in the simplest terms ... it is an offence in most of the civilised world to print lies about an individual or individuals. If you wish to avoid restrictions such as that I suggest you try moving to Portugal and learn the language.

Do be careful not to criticise those members of the establishment in public office in any way though or you may find yourself doing serious jail time as a consequence.

One law for the rich etc ...

You think people fear the law on libel, but that isn't necessarily what is restricting them.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2332 on: February 27, 2017, 01:23:36 PM »
I would suggest G-Unit does not.  We appear to be hacking over the appeal court judgement again, and that, put simply, said that the publication of McCann theory of abduction (without proof) meant Amaral's alternative (without proof) could be published, and that in the main, it reflected the interim report.

Criticising members of the establishment in public office is treated in the main in a similar manner in Portugal and the UK.  If it defames, it is a civil offence, not criminal, so jail time is zero.  The difference in Portugal is that if it is someone in public office (and other cases) that is defamed, the financial penalty is increased by 50%.

The only instance I am personally aware of is a woman who defamed two GNR officers by getting her facts wrong and putting that on social media.  GNR officers are hardly "the rich", but the rules are simple.  Defame GNR officers and the financial penalty will be increased by 50%.

This tends to mean that people in general and the media in particular are careful to make sure their allegations are backed by solid evidence.  Personally, I prefer that to what appears to be a much more loose and sloppy approach in the UK.

Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on October 11, 2016
Outrage over jailing of Portuguese woman who called judges “gangs of organised criminals”

It is a case that goes back 16 years and which is causing a wave of outrage on social media. Fifty-year-old Maria de Lurdes Lopes Rodrigues entered Tires jail (Cascais) nearly two weeks ago to serve a three-year sentence for defamation - handed out almost 16 years ago.

The ‘victims’ of her crimes are judges, policemen and prosecutors - many of them high-profile, and extremely well-connected.

As critics explain, it is “extremely rare, almost unheard of” for anyone to be prosecuted for “minor crimes such as offence and defamation”, but in this case perhaps, Maria de Lurdes’ ‘victims’ were simply too important to let the insults go.
Suffice it to say, she is now sharing a cell with two women convicted of murder.

She had dodged her conviction for years, managed to evade orders remanding her to ‘psychiatric accompaniment’ but finally, on September 29, ‘time ran out’.

“It seems that we are in a Third World country, but this is Portugal in the 21st century”, writes friend and ‘social activist’ Mário Gomes, who is behind the gathering appeal to free Rodrigues.

“This woman is not a criminal. She is an intellectual and an artist”.

Indeed, Gomes explains that in the two weeks since her incarceration, Rodrigues has “tried to adapt to prison life, the very rigorous timetables, the slamming of doors, the internal conflicts - very often violent - in which no-one in authority steps in to halt”, and she has made friends: a Moldovian woman imprisoned for falsifying immigration papers, and a Brazilian girl in jail for carrying drugs into Europe.

The trio asked to be transferred to a shared cell. “On the explicit orders of the prison governor, the Moldovian and Brazilian were transferred to a joint cell. Lurdes was transferred to another where her company are two women serving time for murder”.

“What more can I say?” He asks. “People say it isn’t possible to jail someone for words denouncing illegalities. I am sorry but it is. Please all of you leave your iPads, PCs, latest generation mobile phones and do something to get this human being out of prison!”

The facebook group now in operation is rapidly amassing members (click here).

The background to this story can be found in media archives. It centres on Rodrigues taking out a prosecution against former culture minister Manuel Maria Carrilho (currently involved in VIP divorce proceedings with a former game show hostess) in 1996.

Carrilho had ‘robbed her’ of the chance of a scholarship to continue her studies in cinematography, claimed Rodrigues.

Then in her late 30s, Lurdes won the case, which went to appeal.

As her friend Mário Gomes explains, she lost thereafter in court “with a judge whom she accused of corruption because, as (Rodrigues) believed, she (the judge) always put herself on the side of the minister”.

And so it went on. Diário de Notícias explained in 2013 that Rodrigues refused to give up, filing complaints about “various personalities, like the former Attorney General of the Republic Pinto Monteiro, the director of DCIAP Maria José Morgado and the director of the PJ Almeida Rodrigues, accusing them of “excusing crimes” practised by people she had accused of “stealing and plundering” her home and property”.

There came a point where she wrote that DIAP director Morgado “smiled like a psychopath and murderer” over Rodrigues’ case of eviction.

And then came the letters describing the Attorney General and other personalities as “criminal gangs”.

As DN said at the time, Maria de Lurdes Lopes Rodrigues has entered into the history of Portuguese justice “as being one of the few people condemned to prison for a minor crime like offence and defamation”.

It now remains to be seen if she stays there, or if this impetus to see her freed rings the changes.

The Free Maria de Lurdes facebook group is open to anyone, of any nationality.

Its next upcoming event is a meeting at the Faculty of Human and Social Sciences on October 24, to debate: “Freedom, Censure and Democracy”.

natasha.donn@algarveresident.com

Categories:
Portugal
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2333 on: February 27, 2017, 01:32:17 PM »
You think people fear the law on libel, but that isn't necessarily what is restricting them.

Please provide a cite detailing the restrictions placed on individuals who intend to put factual material into the public domain but are deterred from doing so by whatever it is you think may deter them.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2334 on: February 27, 2017, 01:44:34 PM »
Posted by PORTUGALPRESS on October 11, 2016
Outrage over jailing of Portuguese woman who called judges “gangs of organised criminals”

It is a case that goes back 16 years and which is causing a wave of outrage on social media. Fifty-year-old Maria de Lurdes Lopes Rodrigues entered Tires jail (Cascais) nearly two weeks ago to serve a three-year sentence for defamation - handed out almost 16 years ago.

The ‘victims’ of her crimes are judges, policemen and prosecutors - many of them high-profile, and extremely well-connected.

As critics explain, it is “extremely rare, almost unheard of” for anyone to be prosecuted for “minor crimes such as offence and defamation”, but in this case perhaps, Maria de Lurdes’ ‘victims’ were simply too important to let the insults go.
Suffice it to say, she is now sharing a cell with two women convicted of murder.

She had dodged her conviction for years, managed to evade orders remanding her to ‘psychiatric accompaniment’ but finally, on September 29, ‘time ran out’.

“It seems that we are in a Third World country, but this is Portugal in the 21st century”, writes friend and ‘social activist’ Mário Gomes, who is behind the gathering appeal to free Rodrigues.

“This woman is not a criminal. She is an intellectual and an artist”.

Indeed, Gomes explains that in the two weeks since her incarceration, Rodrigues has “tried to adapt to prison life, the very rigorous timetables, the slamming of doors, the internal conflicts - very often violent - in which no-one in authority steps in to halt”, and she has made friends: a Moldovian woman imprisoned for falsifying immigration papers, and a Brazilian girl in jail for carrying drugs into Europe.

The trio asked to be transferred to a shared cell. “On the explicit orders of the prison governor, the Moldovian and Brazilian were transferred to a joint cell. Lurdes was transferred to another where her company are two women serving time for murder”.

“What more can I say?” He asks. “People say it isn’t possible to jail someone for words denouncing illegalities. I am sorry but it is. Please all of you leave your iPads, PCs, latest generation mobile phones and do something to get this human being out of prison!”

The facebook group now in operation is rapidly amassing members (click here).

The background to this story can be found in media archives. It centres on Rodrigues taking out a prosecution against former culture minister Manuel Maria Carrilho (currently involved in VIP divorce proceedings with a former game show hostess) in 1996.

Carrilho had ‘robbed her’ of the chance of a scholarship to continue her studies in cinematography, claimed Rodrigues.

Then in her late 30s, Lurdes won the case, which went to appeal.

As her friend Mário Gomes explains, she lost thereafter in court “with a judge whom she accused of corruption because, as (Rodrigues) believed, she (the judge) always put herself on the side of the minister”.

And so it went on. Diário de Notícias explained in 2013 that Rodrigues refused to give up, filing complaints about “various personalities, like the former Attorney General of the Republic Pinto Monteiro, the director of DCIAP Maria José Morgado and the director of the PJ Almeida Rodrigues, accusing them of “excusing crimes” practised by people she had accused of “stealing and plundering” her home and property”.

There came a point where she wrote that DIAP director Morgado “smiled like a psychopath and murderer” over Rodrigues’ case of eviction.

And then came the letters describing the Attorney General and other personalities as “criminal gangs”.

As DN said at the time, Maria de Lurdes Lopes Rodrigues has entered into the history of Portuguese justice “as being one of the few people condemned to prison for a minor crime like offence and defamation”.

It now remains to be seen if she stays there, or if this impetus to see her freed rings the changes.

The Free Maria de Lurdes facebook group is open to anyone, of any nationality.

Its next upcoming event is a meeting at the Faculty of Human and Social Sciences on October 24, to debate: “Freedom, Censure and Democracy”.

natasha.donn@algarveresident.com

Categories:
Portugal

Supreme rejects application for release of Maria de Lourdes
The Fellow has been detained at the Tires Prison since September, serving a three-year prison term for crimes of defamation and libel against judges and magistrates.
ALINE FLOR  February 21, 2017, 9:50 p.m.

The Supreme Court last week rejected the petition for habeas corpus by Maria de Lurdes Rodrigues, a grantee who is serving three years in prison for crimes of defamation and libel against judges and magistrates.

The habeas corpus petition , sent by four members of the Madeira Legislative Assembly at the beginning of February, argued that "the penalty imposed is totally out of step with the seriousness of the crimes attributed to him and of which he was accused, and that his arrest results from A judicial error that translates into a violation of human rights ".


The case of Maria de Lourdes grantee: request for release sent to the Supreme Court
In a decision signed on February 15, the judges understood that "the unlawfulness of the imprisonment is not verified" and decided "to dismiss, as unfounded, the writ of habeas corpus requested by the citizens of the Autonomous Region of Madeira ... in favor of Maria of Lurdes Lopes Rodrigues ".

The case goes back to 1996, when Maria de Lourdes felt wronged for not having been awarded a scholarship by the Ministry of Culture. After challenging the scholarship process, the investigator challenged the actions of the judges involved in the proceedings, in a way that was considered insulting.

On 29 September 2016, after a lengthy appeal and rejection of the psychiatric treatment measure proposed to suspend the sentence, the grantee was detained and taken to the Tires Prison to serve the three-year sentence of Imprisonment for crimes of defamation and libel against judges and magistrates.

Raquel Coelho, a member of the Portuguese Labor Party in the Legislative Assembly of Madeira and one of the applicants for habeas corpus , was not surprised by the court's decision on this specific request, despite disagreeing with the view of the judges on the legality of the case. "We consider that her arrest violates the Constitution," he said in statements to the public.

The regional deputy emphasizes that the request was filed as "the only option" to "try to humanize the Portuguese justice", considering the sentence of disproportionate arrest - it is one of the few people sentenced to serve an effective prison sentence for minor crimes - And that "it makes little sense for a person in these circumstances to be arrested for criticizing a judge."

Without confirming whether there will be scope for further legal action, Raquel Coelho guarantees that the petition's subscribers will continue to put public pressure to ensure that the case is not forgotten.
https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=pt&u=https://www.publico.pt/2017/02/21/sociedade/noticia/supremo-rejeita-pedido-de-libertacao-da-bolseira-maria-de-lurdes-1762868&prev=search
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2335 on: February 27, 2017, 02:11:06 PM »
I think she's restricted in what she's allowed to say, as is anyone speaking via the media, it seems.
In the UK, we are not allowed to libel and slander people without the threat of legal action hanging over our heads.  What a primitive country we live in, eh?  How much more civilized it would be if I could accuse your son of being a paedophile or your daughter of being a spouse beater, with the onus being on your kids to "prove their innocence".

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2336 on: February 27, 2017, 07:57:49 PM »
After yesterdays LBC rant, I see the 'wonderful' Katie Hopkins today was the recipient of libel proceedings, and not for the first time it seems.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/27/jack-monroe-begins-libel-proceedings-against-katie-hopkins

Offline Robittybob1

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2337 on: March 01, 2017, 06:22:49 AM »
After yesterdays LBC rant, I see the 'wonderful' Katie Hopkins today was the recipient of libel proceedings, and not for the first time it seems.


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/27/jack-monroe-begins-libel-proceedings-against-katie-hopkins
LBC - Leading Britain's conversation.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2338 on: March 02, 2017, 08:12:51 AM »
' Watchdog says police cuts have left force in 'perilous state'

Government austerity blamed in report, which shows stretched forces downgrading calls and leaving suspects at large '

Policing in England and Wales is in a “potentially perilous state” as government cuts lead to investigations being shelved, vulnerable victims being let down and tens of thousands of dangerous suspects remaining at large, a watchdog has warned.

In a report on effectiveness in policing, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) uncovered a range of “dangerous” and “disturbing” practices that have arisen out of police forces’ approach to dealing with budget cuts in excess of 20%.


 
Some police staff are deliberately downgrading emergency calls in order to justify a slower response when there is a shortage of officers, HMIC said, while others are reclassifying high-risk domestic abuse victims to a lower level of concern.

Police officers are being assigned to investigations that they are not qualified to conduct, the watchdog found, while forces are struggling to get to grips with the volume of wanted suspects – including murderers, rapists and violent offenders.

Around a third of domestic abuse cases across England and Wales are being shelved because the victim does not support police action – this rises to 50% in five of the 43 forces, which has led to concern at HMIC that officers are not properly discharging their responsibilities in a bid to slash their workload.

HMIC also issued a warning that a shortage of detectives and investigators amounts to a “national crisis”.

In a stark message about the current state of policing, Zoë Billingham, Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary, said the “disturbing” practices did not apply to the majority of forces but the watchdog could see the problems spreading if action was not taken.

“We’re leading to a very serious conclusion regarding the potentially perilous state of policing,” she said. “It’s a red flag that we’re raising at this stage. A large red flag.”

Billingham said “ad hoc rationing” of services was due to “stretch in the system” and was the “unintended consequence of the way in which some forces have adapted to austerity”.

“This suppression of demand, this ad hoc rationing that’s happening at different pinch points, isn’t part of a deliberate plan, it’s not part of a rational evidence-based plan decision model,” she said. “It’s happening under the radar, it’s often happening by stealth and it’s often an unintended consequence of the way in which some forces have adapted to austerity

Despite the inspector’s criticism of the policing landscape, the majority of police forces were graded as “good” or “outstanding” for effectiveness. One force – Bedfordshire police – was rated inadequate.

But the inspectorate said it had discovered some forces using “inappropriate” methods to deal with increasing levels of demand with fewer resources.

In some cases, this has led to failings in dealing with the most vulnerable victims, HMIC said, in particular to victims of domestic abuse. In two forces, for example, domestic abuse risk assessments were, in too many cases, conducted over the telephone when the call taker judged that there was not an immediate risk to the victim. HMIC said this was in part due to the increase in demand on the service: between August 2013 and June 2016 police recorded a 61% increase in domestic abuse crimes. As a way of dealing with this demand, some forces are not sending officers to domestic abuse incidents.


Similarly, forces are struggling to cope with the number of wanted suspects. HMIC found that 67,000 wanted suspects had not been placed on the police national computer (PNC). In addition, as of August, there were 45,960 wanted suspects on the PNC, including those being sought for offences including terrorism, murder and rape.

“In too many forces, there is a lack of grip, supervision, active management, pursuit and tracking down of wanted suspects,” the report said.

HMIC said it was concerned about the workloads of the teams supervising registered sex offenders. It found that throughout England and Wales, the risk represented by some 2,700 registered sex offenders had yet to be assessed by police officers responsible for their supervision in order to keep communities safe. In six forces, more than 10% of registered sex offenders had yet to be assessed at the time of the inspection. In one force, that figure was 30%

The watchdog found that organised crime groups were not being assessed properly by some forces, including the Metropolitan police. Assessing organised crime gangs, once they have been identified, allows forces to understand the threat posed and to decide which groups to tackle first.

“It is unacceptable that some large urban forces with a high threat from serious and organised crime have relatively fewer mapped criminal groups than small rural forces,” the report said.

The difficulties are being compounded by what HMIC called the “national crisis” of the severe shortage of investigators, such as detectives. The lack of investigators is leading to “excessive workloads and stress” among police officers and staff, the watchdog said. The inspectorate added the shortage meant some investigations were being led by those who lacked the appropriate skills and experience.



Ch Supt Gavin Thomas, the president of the Police Superintendents’ Association of England and Wales, said: “The public will be worried by this report and I share their concerns. There are now 34,000 fewer staff working in policing than there were in 2010, including 19,000 fewer police officers. The amount of money available for policing has also reduced over time.

“At the same time, a great deal of police time and resources are now spent meeting the demands of complex welfare and vulnerability issues in society. As a minimum these should be addressed in partnership with other public services. But as a 24/7 service, policing continues to pick up demand that is not being met by other services.”

Steve White, chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales, which represents tens of thousands of rank-and-file officers, said: “The federation has been pointing out the pitfalls of continually taking the axe to police budgets over successive years and warning that it will actually hurt the very people we have pledged to protect – members of the public.

“Some forces are clearly coping better than others, but you can’t compare 43 forces to one another – it’s like comparing apples with pears. What we are seeing is a service that is only being driven by cost constraints and some areas of policing are on the critical list and heading towards intensive care.”

Brandon Lewis, minister for policing and the fire service, said: “I am pleased that two-thirds of forces are rated in [the] report as either good or outstanding, and that there have been real improvements, in particular, in the overall police response to vulnerable people.

“But a number of forces clearly still have more work to do to ensure they are providing the level of service which communities expect and deserve.

“This government has protected police funding, through the 2015 spending review. There can be no excuse for any force that fails to deliver on its obligations – those identified as inadequate or requiring improvement must take HMIC’s findings very seriously.”

Diane Abbott, the shadow home secretary, said: “The report shows that the police are doing their best despite this Tory government’s actions. Her Majesty’s inspectorate says that some forces are struggling to respond to shrinking resources. Some are artificially downgrading the severity of calls, others are not able to properly carry out their core functions of crime prevention, public security and apprehending criminals. Some are setting quotas for specialist police or failing to register organised gangs in their area, because that would require further action.

“We should be clear, the primary responsibility for this is not individual forces or officers. The fault lies with the Tory government, who have cut 20,000 police officers and who are now cutting police budgets across the country.”

 
 Brian Paddick: ‘The thin blue line is getting stretched to breaking point.’ Photograph: Murdo MacLeod/the Guardian
Brian Paddick, Liberal Democrat shadow home secretary and former deputy assistant commissioner in the Metropolitan police, said: “Police officers have a ‘can-do’ mentality. But the thin blue line is getting stretched to breaking point and vulnerable people are being placed at risk as a result.

“It is totally unacceptable that police officers, who are doing more than anyone can reasonably expect of them, are being forced to downgrade ‘life at risk’ calls. How long will it be before someone dies because there is no police officer to respond?

“The government needs to urgently rethink imposing even more cuts on the police service ahead of the budget next week.”

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/02/inspectorate-police-engaging-dangerous-practices-austerity-cuts-diane-abbott

Yet money is being spent on this case with nothing to show for it, after £13,000,000.................

Offline Brietta

Re: General discussion about the latest news (not search related)
« Reply #2339 on: March 02, 2017, 10:30:58 PM »
PUBLIC RELEASE: 2-MAR-2017
Exploring the world of the Madeleine McCann trolls
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD

A DECADE has passed since the disappearance of toddler Madeleine McCann on holiday in Portugal, but activity online regarding the case is constant, with some of this commentary being directed in the form of abuse, a behaviour commonly referred to as 'trolling'. It is estimated that every hour there are more than 100 tweets posted using the McCann hashtag.

Now, University of Huddersfield psychology researchers have entered the world of internet trolls and their abusive, aggressive language, directed towards those who disagree with them. Described in a new journal article, the project has led to a call for measures - including an end to pseudonyms on Twitter - that would curb the anonymity that enables cyber-trolling.

The work is featured in an online editorial headed The dark side of social media for the prestigious journal, Nature, and the research reinforces newly-revealed UK Government plans to curb cyber abuse.

The University of Huddersfield's Dr John Synnott - who co-authored the new article in Computers in Human Behaviour - commented that: "It is encouraging to see that ministers have called the major social media platforms to Whitehall to demand that they do more to protect people online from cyber bullying and trolling or face sanctions. This is a step in the right direction by making these platforms responsible for negative behaviour that they unfortunately enable."

"There is absolutely a need for such precautions," continued Dr Synnott. "Trolls are hiding behind the facility to be anonymous, which Twitter enables to a certain degree. Our research can contribute to an understanding and a reduction in trolling behaviour and one of the main interpretations is that the level of anonymity provided by certain social networking sites is a massive enabler."

A key discovery of the research conducted by Dr Synnott, his Huddersfield colleague Dr Maria Ioannou and postgraduate student Andria Coulias, is that far from operating in isolation - as has usually been argued - trolls form "anti-social networks" that reinforce their behaviour. Also, media reports that condemn the trolls' actions have the effect of "showering them with the very attention they appear to covet".

Trailing the trolls

Dr Synnott is Assistant Director of the University of Huddersfield's MSc in Investigative Psychology - Dr Ioannou is Course Director - and as a regular user of social media sites he developed an interest in trolling and the psychology behind it

The sheer volume of tweets by the anti-McCann group - and by supporters of Madeleine's parents - meant that it would be an excellent case study. A sample of 400 McCann-related tweets obtained from 37 user accounts and containing a total of 7,600 words was analysed by the research team. The article describing the project contains samples of the abusive, often illiterate language used by trolls.

It was found that "the insults and abuse levelled at both the McCanns and the pro-McCann users were constant, repetitive, and in clear violation of Twitter policies, though user accounts were rarely suspended".

The theme of motherhood implied a strong female presence in the anti-McCann group, whereas earlier research has suggested that trolls are mostly male, because of frequent misogynistic sentiments.

"This is stage one of this research," said Dr Synnott. "The paper doesn't attempt to take a position on the case, but rather aims to explore trolling behaviour in general. The McCann group was the most obvious place for us to start. Stage two, which is currently in development, will be an analysis of the Pro-McCann group, to explore any differences or similarities between them."

The article concludes that "the damaging impact the McCann trolls' behaviour has had on those victimised" makes necessary "the continuation of research exploiting the ways in which aggressive forms of trolling materialise, so that we might consequently establish ways in which to effectively deal with them".


* The article, Online trolling: The case of Madeleine McCann, by Dr John Synnott, Andria Coulias and Dr Maria Ioannou, is in the latest issue of Computers in Human Behavior.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....