General discussion about the latest news (not search related)

[G-Unit]

Please take my message as being in no way critical of you personally whatsoever, because the truth is I am grateful for being given a pointer as to what is going on.

Woman?  The supposed woman who allegedly disappeared on a boat to Brazil, perhaps.

Revelation tomorrow?  I shall wait and see.

The Sunday Express is also to publish an 8 page special on the 10th anniversary?  I make that 3rd of May 2017, a Wednesday.

I presume they mean Sunday 30 Apr 2017.

Spotted close to where she went missing? Are they referring to the woman in purple perhaps?

[barrier]

The woman who does not live in Portugal is do to be questioned, how far does SY jurisdiction spread unless of course its close to the UK.

[G-Unit]

Well, if it's the woman in purple we have a good idea who she could have been.

[barrier]

Well, if it's the woman in purple we have a good idea who she could have been.

Indeed.

[G-Unit]

I think that's rather rude.  Let's have some critical analysis from you that Operation Grange were too stupid and / or too lazy and / or corrupted by the High Ups to pursue the parents in the light of all the supposed evidence against them then?  Over to you.

Rude? Compared to some on here my manners are impeccable.

There's no reason to assume OG were stupid, lazy or corrupt. Their remit was to investigate 'the abduction' and that is what they have done.

[Brietta]

Indeed.

Cryptic comments are fine never mind the bandwidth they take up but you either know or you don't know.  If you do know ... please do share, otherwise please move on to something about which you do know enough to enable you to express an opinion.

[Benice]

You have been saying the McCanns had been investigated and ruled out by OG. They haven't.

Groundhog day G??

All the information in SY's possession was meticulously examined by a team of around 30 officers.

So - either they found but ignored evidence pointing to the McCanns  - which would mean all those officers are  corrupt  - or they found no evidence pointing to the McCanns - hence their statement ruling them out as suspects.

The idea that so many police officers agreed to be part of a 'conspiracy' to exclude the McCanns from their investigatons is way too far fetched for me.

AIMHO

 

[Alfie]

Rude? Compared to some on here my manners are impeccable.

There's no reason to assume OG were stupid, lazy or corrupt. Their remit was to investigate 'the abduction' and that is what they have done.

there is every reason to assume the Met are stupid, lazy or corrupt if they haven't at any point considered the parents might have been involved especially if there is evidence to suggest they were (evidence you seem to consider exists in notable enough quantity).

[barrier]

there is every reason to assume the Met are stupid, lazy or corrupt if they haven't at any point considered the parents might have been involved especially if there is evidence to suggest they were (evidence you seem to consider exists in notable enough quantity).

Its hard to understand and possibly understanderble just what SY are doing, question to and answer from Rowley.

Q: You say you haven’t got definitive evidence, do you have any clues at all which might explain what
happened to her?
MR: So, younger’ll understand from your experience, the way murder investigations work, detectives will
start off with various hypotheses, about what’s happened in a murder, what has happened in a
missing person’s investigation, whether someone has been abducted. All those different possibilities
will be worked through. This case is no different from that but the evidence is limited at the moment to
be cast iron as to which one of those hypotheses we should follow. So we have to keep an open
mind. As I said we have some critical lines of enquiry, those linked to particular lines of enquiry, but
I’m not going to discuss them today because they are very much live investigations.

[stephen25000]

'I'LL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES'

'Kate McCann reveals she plans to buy missing Maddie a present for her 14th birthday in only interview to mark 10th anniversary of disappearance

The defiant couple have poured their hearts out as they admitted they should've been a 'family of five' for all this time'

The irony of those words is beyond redemption.

..and the use of 'defiant', also marks the article out.

i.e. they did no wrong.


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3445170/madeleine-mccann-disappearance-kate-mccann-birthday-present/

[G-Unit]

Groundhog day G??

All the information in SY's possession was meticulously examined by a team of around 30 officers.

So - either they found but ignored evidence pointing to the McCanns  - which would mean all those officers are  corrupt  - or they found no evidence pointing to the McCanns - hence their statement ruling them out as suspects.

The idea that so many police officers agreed to be part of a 'conspiracy' to exclude the McCanns from their investigatons is way too far fetched for me.

AIMHO

Do you have any idea how a team works? Do you have an idea how a hierarchical organisation works? If you do you will understand that 30 police officers wouldn't be involved in assessing all the evidence or in any decisions taken about what that evidence meant. 

[barrier]

Do you have any idea how a team works? Do you have an idea how a hierarchical organisation works? If you do you will understand that 30 police officers wouldn't be involved in assessing all the evidence or in any decisions taken about what that evidence meant.

Hogan Howe  alluded to this back last April when asked what did 30 officers do.

[Alfie]

Do you have any idea how a team works? Do you have an idea how a hierarchical organisation works? If you do you will understand that 30 police officers wouldn't be involved in assessing all the evidence or in any decisions taken about what that evidence meant.

Do you think most of Op Grange's team don't have the ability to think for themselves, or have enquiring minds, do you think if an one of them had voiced suspicions about the parents they'd be told to keep quiet?

[stephen25000]

Do you think most of Op Grange's team don't have the ability to think for themselves, or have enquiring minds, do you think if an one of them had voiced suspicions about the parents they'd be told to keep quiet?

They would do what their superiors told them to do.

Meanwhile they would have had no trouble donating to Amaral's fund.

[Mr Gray]

They would do what their superiors told them to do.

Meanwhile they would have had no trouble donating to Amaral's fund.

If they dodnated to the fund dont you think they might spill the beans if they had any knowledge taht the mccanns were not to be investigated..