Author Topic: Blogger Nigel Nessling avoids prison after downloading 40,000 indecent images.  (Read 99097 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Can you explain again please and do you feel that the thread has been worthwhile?
Has it achieved what you intended?

Well i for one is grateful of this thread, it has made me able to warn family members who live in that area.

It was said earlier in the thread that what he has done would not affect me, well it did.

Surprisingly they knew nothing of it, although living quite close.

It's also correct, that with him pleading guilty, the full extent of what he did is not known. IMO

Unfortunately Nessling is still amongst them, but at least now they know.

Hopefully will have alerted anyone else who lives close,  as well who read this thread.

Offline kizzy

This forum, sadly has seen posters regularly attacking the poster instead of the post in the past. Some of the worst offenders have departed, so hopefully the resulting improvement will continue.

During my recent research I have noticed that many sites have no recent posts (unless they are hiding them, which is of interest in itself). Perhaps the level of hatred and abuse some of them displayed was what led to their demise.

This site is unique because it gives a voice to all with an interest in the case of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. If it can set an example by being polite and respectful at all times, that will be an impressive achievement of which we can all be proud. 

That was the aim of the thread.

Again G-UNIT well said,  8@??)(

Although, you should not have to keep  explaining yourself IMO

Offline Mr Gray

Well i for one is grateful of this thread, it has made me able to warn family members who live in that area.

It was said earlier in the thread that what he has done would not affect me, well it did.

Surprisingly they knew nothing of it, although living quite close.

It's also correct, that with him pleading guilty, the full extent of what he did is not known. IMO

Unfortunately Nessling is still amongst them, but at least now they know.

Hopefully will have alerted anyone else who lives close,  as well who read this thread.

Why should any of your family memberes be at thtreat from nessling. Surely we all do what we can to keep our children safe...none of us knows who live on our area...what extraa precautions will your relatives be taking...no more than I take with my children yet I live miles away

Offline jassi

A thread that attracts only a handful of posts might not be worthwhile ,but the same can't be said for one which has attracted nearly 400 so far.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Why should any of your family memberes be at thtreat from nessling. Surely we all do what we can to keep our children safe...none of us knows who live on our area...what extraa precautions will your relatives be taking...no more than I take with my children yet I live miles away


Excuse me, i cant believe you did not get the point.

No none of us know who live in our area, but we should. [especially when it's made public]

They do keep there children safe, but now can keep them safer.

How do you know, they don't know him.
imo i wouldn't think him safe among children. [would you]

Offline G-Unit

When we have discussed abuse here many times there is a continual claim that someone else started it. Several time s I have called for and end to all abuse and sniping but certain posters just have not been interested. So ..again...I am quite happy to see the end of all abusive and sniping commnents...lets stop...does anyone want to try it...the answer is yes or no....it really is that simple

Well said davel. I have noticed your efforts to move away from such practices and I hope we can all agree to disagree in future without making accusations or insinuations about each other. That was what I hoped this thread would accomplish.  8@??)(
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray


Excuse me, i cant believe you did not get the point.

No none of us know who live in our area, but we should. [especially when it's made public]

They do keep there children safe, but now can keep them safer.

How do you know, they don't know him.
imo i wouldn't think him safe among children. [would you]
I wouldnt want him near my children. The point I am making is we protect our children anyway...

Offline kizzy

I wouldnt want him near my children. The point I am making is we protect our children anyway...

Sometimes though, it is better to know who from. 

Don't forget Davel, he was involved in children's charity's so i would imagine children.

Who's parents would have trusted him, at the same time as keeping their children safe.

Offline Mr Gray

Sometimes though, it is better to know who from. 

Don't forget Davel, he was involved in children's charity's so i would imagine children.

Who's parents would have trusted him, at the same time as keeping their children safe.

the current thinking is to trust nobody.....when schools ask for help from parents with transport they want a current DBS.....Im very careful who has access to my children...

Offline kizzy

the current thinking is to trust nobody.....when schools ask for help from parents with transport they want a current DBS.....Im very careful who has access to my children...

Good ,so am i.

Not everyone is though, but they don't deserve their child being abused.

DBS checked is good, wonder if Nessling was at some point, there is always a first time.

No child is 100% safe, from sex abusers.

Offline G-Unit

It seems some people can live with Nessling's "Devil's Dictionary" where he refers to 'anti's' as " a disparate group of paedophiles, murderers, social failures and mental cripples."..." a) a shut-in b) a cranky pensioner c) mentally disturbed d) developmentally delayed e) jobless or f) all of the above."....
https://nigelnessling.wordpress.com/the-anti-madeleine-dictionary/


On the other hand, a mildly critical post referring to people like them is seen as abusive. That seems somewhat over sensitive to me.


« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 11:15:49 AM by Admin »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Lots of people  on this thread have tried to justify Nessling's abuse by pointing the finger at others. So far, imo, they haven't managed to find anything matching his loathsomeness.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 11:18:35 AM by Admin »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline misty

Lots of people  on this thread have tried to justify Nessling's abuse by pointing the finger at others. So far, imo, they haven't managed to find anything matching his loathsomeness.

No-one has tried to justify his online behaviour imo. Rather, what there has been is an uncalled-for attempt to tar those who posted alongside him with the same brush.
Clearly you have not encountered those of a more vile disposition than Nessling & I have no intention of providing cites to prove a point.

Offline Brietta


Excuse me, i cant believe you did not get the point.

No none of us know who live in our area, but we should. [especially when it's made public]

They do keep there children safe, but now can keep them safer.

How do you know, they don't know him.
imo i wouldn't think him safe among children. [would you]

In my opinion ... not a terribly good idea.

Investigations opened into vigilante murder of man mistaken for paedophile
IPCC and Bristol council review dealings with Bijan Ebrahimi, burned to death by neighbours after photographing vandals
Steven Morris and agency
Tuesday 29 October 2013 09.12 GMT

Two independent investigations are under way into the murder of an innocent man who was beaten and burned to death after vigilante neighbours mistook him for a paedophile.

Bijan Ebrahimi, 44, had taken a series of photographs of local youths attacking his hanging baskets and intended to hand the images to police as evidence.

But someone saw him with the camera and told police that Ebrahimi, who was registered disabled and couldn't work, had taken pictures of children.

Officers took him away for questioning and as Ebrahimi left his council maisonette in Bristol residents began chanting: "Paedo, paedo".

He was quizzed at a police station but officers soon realised he was blameless and released him. By then rumours had begun circulating in the Brislington area that he was a child abuser and two days later he was murdered.

A neighbour, Lee James, 24, beat Ebrahim unconscious and then with the help of his friend Stephen Norley, also 24, dragged him into the street. He was doused with white spirits and set on fire.

James pleaded guilty to murder and Norley admitted assisting an offender. They will be sentenced at Bristol crown court next month.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is examining how officers dealt with Ebrahimi before his death.

Last month the IPCC said it had served notices of gross misconduct to three police constables who had dealings with the murdered man. They have been suspended by Avon and Somerset police.

An inspector, sergeant and constable who dealt with Ebrahimi while he was in custody have also been served with notices of gross misconduct.

Bristol city council has launched its own voluntary review of any contact it had with the victim.

Speaking after the hearing, an Avon and Somerset police spokesman emphasised Ebrahimi was innocent. He said: "Mr Ebrahimi was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence – breach of the peace – and after being interviewed he was released with no further action taken.

"We can categorically state he had not taken any indecent images and that nothing of concern had been found on his computer."

In a family statement his relatives said Ebrahimi was a "loving and caring man" who lived for his garden.

They said: "Bijan was a quiet, disabled man whose only joys in life came from his horticultural interests and his cat. Bijan was a caring, loving and unselfish man. He was an excellent uncle and a warm, supportive brother."

Ebrahimi was arrested and released on Friday 12 July and was killed in the early hours of Sunday 14 July.

One resident, who wanted to remain anonymous, said: "On the Thursday evening everyone came out and they were calling him a paedophile. There were about 20 people out there all having a say. They had him down as a 100% paedophile. When the police took him away everyone was cheering. Then he got released back into that."

Another resident added: "Whoever started those rumours now has to live with that. He wasn't a paedophile and he's now dead. That's a hell of a conscience to have."

Neighbours spoke of Ebrahimi's passion for the flowers and plants he grew in front of his maisonette. But after youngsters started destroying his beloved garden he began taking pictures to hand over to the council and the police.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/29/vigilante-murder-paedophile-bristol-bijan-ebrahimi
« Last Edit: December 08, 2017, 08:24:24 PM by Brietta »
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

stephen25000

  • Guest
In my idea not a terribly good idea.

Investigations opened into vigilante murder of man mistaken for paedophile
IPCC and Bristol council review dealings with Bijan Ebrahimi, burned to death by neighbours after photographing vandals
Steven Morris and agency
Tuesday 29 October 2013 09.12 GMT

Two independent investigations are under way into the murder of an innocent man who was beaten and burned to death after vigilante neighbours mistook him for a paedophile.

Bijan Ebrahimi, 44, had taken a series of photographs of local youths attacking his hanging baskets and intended to hand the images to police as evidence.

But someone saw him with the camera and told police that Ebrahimi, who was registered disabled and couldn't work, had taken pictures of children.

Officers took him away for questioning and as Ebrahimi left his council maisonette in Bristol residents began chanting: "Paedo, paedo".

He was quizzed at a police station but officers soon realised he was blameless and released him. By then rumours had begun circulating in the Brislington area that he was a child abuser and two days later he was murdered.

A neighbour, Lee James, 24, beat Ebrahim unconscious and then with the help of his friend Stephen Norley, also 24, dragged him into the street. He was doused with white spirits and set on fire.

James pleaded guilty to murder and Norley admitted assisting an offender. They will be sentenced at Bristol crown court next month.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is examining how officers dealt with Ebrahimi before his death.

Last month the IPCC said it had served notices of gross misconduct to three police constables who had dealings with the murdered man. They have been suspended by Avon and Somerset police.

An inspector, sergeant and constable who dealt with Ebrahimi while he was in custody have also been served with notices of gross misconduct.

Bristol city council has launched its own voluntary review of any contact it had with the victim.

Speaking after the hearing, an Avon and Somerset police spokesman emphasised Ebrahimi was innocent. He said: "Mr Ebrahimi was arrested on suspicion of a public order offence – breach of the peace – and after being interviewed he was released with no further action taken.

"We can categorically state he had not taken any indecent images and that nothing of concern had been found on his computer."

In a family statement his relatives said Ebrahimi was a "loving and caring man" who lived for his garden.

They said: "Bijan was a quiet, disabled man whose only joys in life came from his horticultural interests and his cat. Bijan was a caring, loving and unselfish man. He was an excellent uncle and a warm, supportive brother."

Ebrahimi was arrested and released on Friday 12 July and was killed in the early hours of Sunday 14 July.

One resident, who wanted to remain anonymous, said: "On the Thursday evening everyone came out and they were calling him a paedophile. There were about 20 people out there all having a say. They had him down as a 100% paedophile. When the police took him away everyone was cheering. Then he got released back into that."

Another resident added: "Whoever started those rumours now has to live with that. He wasn't a paedophile and he's now dead. That's a hell of a conscience to have."

Neighbours spoke of Ebrahimi's passion for the flowers and plants he grew in front of his maisonette. But after youngsters started destroying his beloved garden he began taking pictures to hand over to the council and the police.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/29/vigilante-murder-paedophile-bristol-bijan-ebrahimi

Can you tell me what happened to the police officers who did not listen to this man, even after he complained on numerous occasions  ?

Hold on, here's a link,


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/05/police-failure-protect-bijan-ebrahimi-murder-ipcc