Who are you talking about in this sentence. "Russell described the woman's partner as bald, so why the PJ would show him the drawing he produced I can't imagine. No-one else ever claimed to have seen it AFAIK. So who were the DM referring to?"
I am talking about Simon Russell. The PJ went to see him because he rang them with information bout a couple who used to work for his parents. He described the male as a bald man. I could understand the police showing him an e fit of a bald man if they had one, but it makes no sense for them to show him what he describes. Also, when they have shown witnesses an e fit they usually say so. In this report no e fit is mentioned by the PJ. Compare it with the PJ's visit to the Dolphin;
Being shown the portraits created as part of the investigation along with various photographs from the case file, she did not recognise the individual nor any similarity. With respect to the picture made by Jane Tanner, attached, she affirmed that the hair in the picture was similar to that of the individual she had seen, as referred to in this statement, such as the colour and the hairstyle. Also the build of the person in the picture appeared similar but she couldn't affirm it was the same person due the lack of facial features in the picture.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LIZELLE_MARAIS.htm
