Where were Jez and Gerry standing when they did their talking? Ideas solutions

[Robittybob1]

No sign of Crecheman/Tannerman's wife in Jane's diagram. If the family had got lost, they certainly hadn't got lost together.

Once I understood what Misty was on about I didn't mind so much. 

[Wonderfulspam]

At no time did DCI Redwood say Crecheman was Tannerman.

What he did say was "We’re almost certain, now, that this sighting is not the abductor.".

 Not THE abductor -but an accomplice, possibly.

....Or an accomplice's accomplice.

Bet you hadn't thought of that.

Maybe there was an entire fleet of child abductors, & watchers, with walkies talkies & getaway vehicles.

[jassi]

....Or an accomplice's accomplice.

Bet you hadn't thought of that.

Maybe there was an entire fleet of child abductors, & watchers, with walkies talkies & getaway vehicles.

That's one explanation for all that mobile phone traffic that night

[misty]

....Or an accomplice's accomplice.

Bet you hadn't thought of that.

Maybe there was an entire fleet of child abductors, & watchers, with walkies talkies & getaway vehicles.

Yeah...whatever.


Amaral seemed to think Tannerman was walking past Block 5 in the direction of Block4. Why would that be if he didn't give Jane's sighting any merit?

https://youtu.be/tUHp85TyJ0Y?t=1102

[faithlilly]

....Or an accomplice's accomplice.

Bet you hadn't thought of that.

Maybe there was an entire fleet of child abductors, & watchers, with walkies talkies & getaway vehicles.

 

[jassi]

Doesn't really matter what Amaral thought - it's what the current boys in blue, (or is it black) think that matters

[Robittybob1]

....Or an accomplice's accomplice.

Bet you hadn't thought of that.

Maybe there was an entire fleet of child abductors, & watchers, with walkies talkies & getaway vehicles.

Anything is possible.

Yeah...whatever.


Amaral seemed to think Tannerman was walking past Block 5 in the direction of Block4. Why would that be if he didn't give Jane's sighting any merit?

https://youtu.be/tUHp85TyJ0Y?t=1102

The whole episode is rather unsolvable as we are finding out.    SY should do the right thing and release the statements that crecheman made.  What is his name where was he staying and what time did he pick up his child. Show us the child.

[misty]

Here's where Amaral places Gerry & Jez.

https://youtu.be/tUHp85TyJ0Y?t=949

[Alice Purjorick]

....Or an accomplice's accomplice.

Bet you hadn't thought of that.

Maybe there was an entire fleet of child abductors, & watchers, with walkies talkies & getaway vehicles.

I think you will find there were*. Always subject to believing all the old crap that has been punted about for the last ten years.

*Standing knee deep in fag ash and dog ends all signalling with Zippos.
The PJ were so inept they failed to take DNA samples from all the dog ends ....... to match them to what one wonders.
You called it earlier....create confusion where none need exist.
I am just harvesting some magic beans ; we could make a killing here...

[Alice Purjorick]

Yeah...whatever.


Amaral seemed to think Tannerman was walking past Block 5 in the direction of Block4. Why would that be if he didn't give Jane's sighting any merit?

https://youtu.be/tUHp85TyJ0Y?t=1102

See if you can work it out for yourself. It is easy enough.

[misty]

Anything is possible.
 The whole episode is rather unsolvable as we are finding out.    SY should do the right thing and release the statements that crecheman made.  What is his name where was he staying and what time did he pick up his child. Show us the child.

Absolutely not, Rob. His family's evidence may be crucial in any eventual court case. The sceptics would merely add the names to those "on the McCann payroll".

[misty]

See if you can work it out for yourself. It is easy enough.

I think I did that a while back on another thread. The Ace he could never play without incriminating himself.

[G-Unit]

If Gerry did use the locked door at 9.05 that night that would explain why Jane initially says she saw him speaking to Jez north of the gate.

What if Gerry's hypothesis that someone was in the apartment during his check was correct too? It that person was Tannerman the abductor he left almost immediately after Gerry did, carrying his daughter. 

If the meeting hadn't stopped Jez's journey home he night have bumped straight into Tannerman on that top corner.

So near and yet so far.

[Robittybob1]

Absolutely not, Rob. His family's evidence may be crucial in any eventual court case. The sceptics would merely add the names to those "on the McCann payroll".

So you really feel this incident is important, that something happened around 9:15 PM? 

[misty]

So you really feel this incident is important, that something happened around 9:15 PM?

Yes. IMO that is when the abduction occurred.