The Smithman e-fits

[G-Unit]

Ten years, after the event both investigating police forces have, stated the parents, are not suspects in the investigation... That's an indisputable fact

The fact, of course, being that it was said.

[Mr Gray]

The fact, of course, being that it was said.

That's right it's, an undeniable, fact that they have, stated this... And there are more undeniable  facts

[G-Unit]

That's right it's, an undeniable, fact that they have, stated this... And there are more undeniable  facts

The existence of the Smithman e-fits is a fact.

[Mr Gray]

The existence of the Smithman e-fits is a fact.

Of course it is.... As is the unreliability  of edits, drawn up so long after event... As is the unreliability of this sort of sighting in general... You only have to look at how many sightings if maddie there have been
So lots of undeniable  fact

[Robittybob1]

Of course it is.... As is the unreliability  of edits, drawn up so long after event... As is the unreliability of this sort of sighting in general... You only have to look at how many sightings if maddie there have been
So lots of undeniable  fact

So what are we saying now, is a sighting that has been proven not to be Madeleine McCann still being claimed as an "undeniable fact"?

[faithlilly]

Ten years, after the event both investigating police forces have, stated the parents, are not suspects in the investigation... That's an indisputable fact

I believe the PJ said that once before.......to cover that they were investigating them.

[sadie]

So what are we saying now, is a sighting that has been proven not to be Madeleine McCann still being claimed as an "undeniable fact"?

Which sighting is that Rob? .... or is it an imaginary situation ?

[Robittybob1]

Which sighting is that Rob? .... or is it an imaginary situation ?

No the sighting of the girl thought to be MM in NZ was confirmed by DNA analysis not to be Madeleine McCann.

[G-Unit]

I believe the PJ said that once before.......to cover that they were investigating them.

In my opinion only a very foolish policeman would publicly name a suspect and warn them.

[Angelo222]

They we're not suspects until the PJ completely misunderstood  the evidence.... This, was confirmed by the archiving dispatch.... As the present investigation  understand the evidence the situation is, different

The achiving despatch stated no such thing.  It concluded that there was insufficient evidence to come to any legal conclusion regarding the parents. The AG stated that the parents lost the opportunity to demonstrate their innocence.

I don't believe the PJ misunderstood any of the evidence and were entirely within their rights to designate the parents as arguidos. Kate McCanns refusal to answer the most innocuous of questions was not consistent with a parent prepared to give police their full cooperation.

[sadie]

No the sighting of the girl thought to be MM in NZ was confirmed by DNA analysis not to be Madeleine McCann.

 

[Angelo222]

Ten years, after the event both investigating police forces have, stated the parents, are not suspects in the investigation... That's an indisputable fact

That's because the investigation isn't wide enough.  A senior Met officer has already stated publicly that investigators do not have a free hand in who to investigate.

[Mr Gray]

That's because the investigation isn't wide enough.  A senior Met officer has already stated publicly that investigators do not have a free hand in who to investigate.

I don't take that, as, fact... What about the Portuguese... Have they been ordered not to investigate the mccanns... I don't think so

[Mr Gray]

The achiving despatch stated no such thing.  It concluded that there was insufficient evidence to come to any legal conclusion regarding the parents. The AG stated that the parents lost the opportunity to demonstrate their innocence.

I don't believe the PJ misunderstood any of the evidence and were entirely within their rights to designate the parents as arguidos. Kate McCanns refusal to answer the most innocuous of questions was not consistent with a parent prepared to give police their full cooperation.

The, archiving dispatch stated that none of the evidence used to make the mccanns, arguidos could be consolidated... That's.. None... They also stated there, was NO evidence... That's NO.... Evidence of any crime by the arguidos... All this is in the files, and can be cited


There is, no cite for... Not enough evidence.. In the, archiving report... It does not say that

Kate, was quite right to stop cooperating with the pj because for reasons discussed many times

[Eleanor]

I don't take that, as, fact... What about the Portuguese... Have they been ordered not to investigate the mccanns... I don't think so

It was all a frightful cock up.  So the less The Portuguese have to say then the better.  But at least they have stopped breaking their own Secrecy Laws.  That alone was an improvement.