Author Topic: The Smithman e-fits  (Read 137548 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #525 on: February 25, 2018, 06:37:34 PM »
O’Doherty’s article gave welcome clarification. Gratton certainly has access to the report. Interesting times ahead.
interesting times ahead....I would imagine those keys are well worn on your computer....

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #526 on: February 25, 2018, 06:41:00 PM »
Gagged ? Why ? Do you think the report libels the McCanns ?

IMO you got the wrong end of the stick when Gatton said the documentary was only the beginning of the story........

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #527 on: February 25, 2018, 06:58:07 PM »
                    Oh Dear   *&^^&

Can you produce the court verdict?
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #528 on: February 25, 2018, 06:58:56 PM »
What would the legal position be if a member of the public released an e fit and a person suffered severe harassment as a result of it...or at worse committed suicide

Well it seems you can name and publish pictures with impunity.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #529 on: February 25, 2018, 07:04:01 PM »
IMO you got the wrong end of the stick when Gatton said the documentary was only the beginning of the story........

When asked if we would be hearing the end Gatton said yes.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #530 on: February 25, 2018, 07:08:12 PM »
You think he won't be gagged if CR get wind of that?

Gagged it what you do when you don’t want someone making a noise.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #531 on: February 25, 2018, 07:09:04 PM »
When asked if we would be hearing the end Gatton said yes.

Was he referring to Halligen rather than the McCanns?
The report is not his property & was subject to a confidentiality clause. Do you really think he would blow his reputation out of the water by revealing the contents, some of which may be detrimental to other POI's in the investigation - because I don't.

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #532 on: February 25, 2018, 07:10:52 PM »
Gagged it what you do when you don’t want someone making a noise.

The report is not just about the McCanns, it involves other people. In the interest of justice, IMO it's best we don't know what's in it.

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #533 on: February 25, 2018, 07:12:43 PM »
Was he referring to Halligen rather than the McCanns?
The report is not his property & was subject to a confidentiality clause. Do you really think he would blow his reputation out of the water by revealing the contents, some of which may be detrimental to other POI's in the investigation - because I don't.

The confidentiality clause had already been breached when Halligen gave Gatton sight of it. Gatton did not sign a confidentiality clause.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #534 on: February 25, 2018, 07:15:21 PM »
The confidentiality clause had already been breached when Halligen gave Gatton sight of it. Gatton did not sign a confidentiality clause.

I think you are going to be very disappointed...again

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #535 on: February 25, 2018, 07:19:04 PM »
I think you are going to be very disappointed...again

Don’t worry about me Davel I still get plenty of joy from the SC judgement  8(0(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #536 on: February 25, 2018, 07:19:25 PM »
The confidentiality clause had already been breached when Halligen gave Gatton sight of it. Gatton did not sign a confidentiality clause.

Why do you think Gatton hasn't divulged the contents since making the documentary about the Con-man?

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #537 on: February 25, 2018, 07:24:26 PM »
Why do you think Gatton hasn't divulged the contents since making the documentary about the Con-man?

Saving it for his new documentary?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #538 on: February 25, 2018, 07:42:54 PM »
Saving it for his new documentary?

Or fearing prosecution?

Offline faithlilly

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #539 on: February 25, 2018, 07:45:00 PM »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?