Author Topic: The Smithman e-fits  (Read 137497 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #600 on: February 27, 2018, 12:48:26 PM »
How many guilty people would do that?  Any got an example?

Just because something has never been known to have happened before doesn't mean it didn't happen. No British child had ever been reported as abducted from it's bed when on holiday in Portugal before. Does that mean it didn't happen?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline kizzy

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #601 on: February 27, 2018, 12:59:41 PM »
The case was archived in 2008 and they were never even arrested, let alone charged.

What do you suppose would have led them to subsequently press for at least a review of available evidence?

What choice did they have, it wouldn't do to throw the towel in would it - reputation and all that. imo

Offline Erngath

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #602 on: February 27, 2018, 01:00:57 PM »
Ridiculous... Imo


Utterly ridiculous!
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #603 on: February 27, 2018, 01:13:10 PM »
How many guilty people would do that?  Any got an example?

What is proven if there is no previous example?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline slartibartfast

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #604 on: February 27, 2018, 01:26:58 PM »
Because in the eye of the public they are not squeaky clean.
They expected that pressing for a review would demonstrate their" innocence"
This has not happened, so they don't dare let go of the tiger's tail.
IMO

Fits the known facts.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Carana

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #605 on: February 27, 2018, 01:40:04 PM »
Because in the eye of the public they are not squeaky clean.
They expected that pressing for a review would demonstrate their" innocence"
This has not happened, so they don't dare let go of the tiger's tail.
IMO

Wouldn't fading into obscurity have been an easier option?

Offline jassi

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #606 on: February 27, 2018, 01:46:17 PM »
Wouldn't fading into obscurity have been an easier option?

You might think so,  Not so  for an alpha male like Gerry though, who always knows best.
Again IMO.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #607 on: February 27, 2018, 01:48:13 PM »
Wouldn't fading into obscurity have been an easier option?

imo G A put a stop to that.

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #608 on: February 27, 2018, 02:58:21 PM »
Wouldn't fading into obscurity have been an easier option?

They are in a no win situation now because of their actions since Maddie disappeared.  Had they and their pals bent over backwards to help the PJ instead of hiding behind international legal differences then they would have been in an entirely different situation now imo.  The situation of the McCanns is the direct opposite of that of the Needhams. The differences between the two cases are staggering yet both should have played out identically.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2018, 03:01:13 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #609 on: February 27, 2018, 03:17:28 PM »
Just because something has never been known to have happened before doesn't mean it didn't happen. No British child had ever been reported as abducted from it's bed when on holiday in Portugal before. Does that mean it didn't happen?

well... erm... does not having evidence of this happening amount to a yes answer? Oh I think so!  8**8:/:
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Lace

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #610 on: February 27, 2018, 04:10:45 PM »
Perhaps you have evidence of the McCann's fight to get the investigation reopened? I assume that they wanted what they asked Cameron for;

we are seeking a joint INDEPENDENT, TRANSPARENT and COMPREHENSIVE review of ALL information held in relation to Madeleine's disappearance.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/8511093/Madeleine-McCann-text-of-parents-letter-to-David-Cameron.html

What they got was not a joint review, just a UK investigative review and it certainly hasn't been transparent in my opinion.

snipped -   "If people want to find Madeleine, we need the case to be reopened," said Mrs McCann. The Met last week released a manipulated photograph to show what Madeleine might look like five years on from the day she vanished while sleeping with her two siblings in the family's holiday apartment in the resort town of Praia da Luz.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #611 on: February 27, 2018, 04:43:59 PM »
What is proven if there is no previous example?
If there was an argument against it by way of an example my argument would fail.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #612 on: February 27, 2018, 04:47:40 PM »
David Icke has shown you can say just about anything and build a case to support it... What is important  is not what is possible but what is probable

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #613 on: February 27, 2018, 05:13:11 PM »
Wouldn't fading into obscurity have been an easier option?

To answer that you'd have to know what they were thinking; not what they said or what you think they were thinking.




Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #614 on: February 27, 2018, 06:04:24 PM »
snipped -   "If people want to find Madeleine, we need the case to be reopened," said Mrs McCann. The Met last week released a manipulated photograph to show what Madeleine might look like five years on from the day she vanished while sleeping with her two siblings in the family's holiday apartment in the resort town of Praia da Luz.

I believe that was said in 2012.  Was it mentioned before the review was agreed?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0