The Smithman e-fits

[Carana]

Does that mean people can stop accusing the McCanns of witholding so-called vital evidence, as has been done in the past?

Just seen this, Vertigo.

Snap.

[barrier]

Does that mean people can stop accusing the McCanns of witholding so-called vital evidence, as has been done in the past?

Didn't that stop when the Times were taken to task?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Just seen this, Vertigo.

Snap.

I can't help but think that this latest "news" (if it can be called that) is nothing but a grave disappointment to some.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Didn't that stop when the Times were taken to task?

Not that I'd noticed, to be honest.

[Carana]

It's the first time that anyone has suggested that the information was handed to anyone except the directors of Madeleine's Fund/the McCanns before 2009.

Both could be true, IMO. Someone in Oakley could have sent them in, and the McCanns /Madeleine Fund didn't got hold of them until later with all the rumpus over terminating the contract.

[Carana]

I can't help but think that this latest "news" (if it can be called that) is nothing but a grave disappointment to some.

Nah, an opportunity to fine tune the consipracy theories...

[barrier]

Thanks, Barrier. The plot thickens. So some unnamed private investigators gave the Met some information about a case they weren't investigating?

The private investigators were working in double quick time or were working away  before the archiving in July 2008 to be able to get a file produced by September 2008.

[barrier]

Nah, an opportunity to fine tune the consipracy theories...

Yeh some one will come up with an abduction before long.

[barrier]

Not that I'd noticed, to be honest.

Cites?

[Carana]

The private investigators were working in double quick time or were working away  before the archiving in July 2008 to be able to get a file produced by September 2008.

The FOI response mentions the efits, not the entire dossier.

Correction: it states "as part of a dossier". It doesn't specify whether they received the whole dossier, or elements of it which constituted the dossier in the UK files as received at the time.

[barrier]

The FOI response mentions the efits, not the entire dossier.

Read again,part of a dossier.

[Carana]

Yeh some one will come up with an abduction before long.

Or that the UK forces "knew" that it was Gerry all along and buried it due to pressure from the top due to Gerry's VIP status in the nuclear / cloning / pharmaceutical industry and / or to simply thwart Amaral's career. It may also be why the NSA refused to acknowledge that they had satellites trained on the path towards the beach in PdL that night...

[jassi]

From the FoI reply
"These efits were received by the Operation Grange team in September 2008
as part of a dossier of material handed to the MPS by private
investigators that had been working on the case. "

It might not be the whole dossier, but clearly more than just the e-fits . The text is quite clear

[barrier]

From the FoI reply
"These efits were received by the Operation Grange team in September 2008
as part of a dossier of material handed to the MPS by private
investigators that had been working on the case. "

It might not be the whole dossier, but clearly more than just the e-fits . The text is quite clear

Not clear enough.

[barrier]

Or that the UK forces "knew" that it was Gerry all along and buried it due to pressure from the top due to Gerry's VIP status in the nuclear / cloning / pharmaceutical industry and / or to simply thwart Amaral's career. It may also be why the NSA refused to acknowledge that they had satellites trained on the path towards the beach in PdL that night...

Its best if you don't ingest this guff.