How accurate would be Martin Smith's ID of Gerry MaCann?

[Carana]

Re: How accurate would be Martin Smith's ID of Gerry MaCann?

Nothing more than what he already clarified, AFAIK.

[Mr Gray]

Re: How accurate would be Martin Smith's ID of Gerry MaCann?

Nothing more than what he already clarified, AFAIK.

There, is, absolutely  no way of knowing how, accurate the I'd was... Simple, as that

[Robittybob1]

There, is, absolutely  no way of knowing how, accurate the I'd was... Simple, as that

But we can tell it broke all the rules under the standard operating procedures.  So that must give us a clue. IMO.

[Carana]

But we can tell it broke all the rules under the standard operating procedures.  So that must give us a clue. IMO.

What are we discussing? His statements to the police or an efit (if he was one of the people to assist with one)? Even if he had, it doesn't constitute an ID.

[Alice Purjorick]

But we can tell it broke all the rules under the standard operating procedures. So that must give us a clue. IMO.

We cannot simply because we don't know with any degree of certainty which process was followed nor by whom.
Furthermore it is always possible to arrive the correct conclusion by a less than perfect route.


edited to correct typo

[Robittybob1]

What are we discussing? His statements to the police or an efit (if he was one of the people to assist with one)? Even if he had, it doesn't constitute an ID.

I was thinking of the production of the e-fit.  But the eyewitness identification of Gerry from seeing  the arguido coming off the plane, probably can't be a reliable identification either.

[jassi]

I was thinking of the production of the e-fit.  But the eyewitness identification of Gerry from seeing  the arguido coming off the plane, probably can't be a reliable identification either.

I think many, including the courts, would  probably agree, so what is your point?
I don't think anyone is suggesting that Gerry should be strung up on the strength of these e-fits or coming off the plane.

[Robittybob1]

I think many, including the courts, would  probably agree, so what is your point?
I don't think anyone is suggesting that Gerry should be strung up on the strength of these e-fits or coming off the plane.

But is it included in the arsenal of reasons to believe the McCanns that done it.

[jassi]

But is it included in the arsenal of reasons to believe the McCanns that done it.

Is it really?
Can you name one sceptic who has said that ?
I mean one who posts on here.

[Robittybob1]

Is it really?
Can you name one sceptic who has said that ?
I mean one who posts on here.

Is there one sceptic that makes it clear they don't add it in their point of view.  Well what about you?  Do you include the identification in your assessment of the McCanns?

[jassi]

Is there one sceptic that makes it clear they don't add it in their point of view.  Well what about you?  Do you include the identification in your assessment of the McCanns?

No, I  came to my conclusions much earlier than that.
Smithman, however, is still a sighting that has not been satisfactorily explained.

[barrier]

No, I  came to my conclusions much earlier than that.
Smithman, however, is still a sighting that has not been satisfactorily explained.

Redwood wasn't exactly crystal clear about tannerman.

[jassi]

Redwood wasn't exactly crystal clear about tannerman.

Has OG really been crystal clear about anything?
It all seems to be down to opinions and 'we think this' or 'we think that' They don't even have a definitive answer as to whether Madeleine is alive or not.

[barrier]

Has OG really been crystal clear about anything?
It all seems to be down to opinions and 'we think this' or 'we think that' They don't even have a definitive answer as to whether Madeleine is alive or not.

Scotland Yard aren't asking for any help from any where,Smithman is known imo.

[Robittybob1]

Scotland Yard aren't asking for any help from any where,Smithman is known imo.

Well go the next step, is he innocent or involved with the McCann case?