Well if 99.9% of missing children are due to the parents (as Yvonne Martin claimed) and their friends, does that mean statistically the McCanns and their friends were the ones that did it? Can stats be applied like this.
Davel is going to show us how to apply the statistics properly. I'm waiting to see it.
I have a feeling it really matters as to what you call the problem Is it a missing child, murdered child, abducted child, or a child that has just run away. Each category will have its own statistics. But are they related.
In this general knowledge article there already is a raft of different categories.
" But how common are child abductions?
The charity Action Against Abduction, formerly Pact, estimates that roughly 50 children under the age of 16 are abducted by strangers every year.
Its report Taken, which used data from UK police forces in 2011-12, found that 42% of all abduction attempts were made by strangers - and three quarters of the attempts were unsuccessful.
The average age of abducted children in the UK was 13, while the average age of children who suffered attempted abductions by non-parental perpetrators was 11, according to the report.
Action Against Abduction claims that most of these cases are sexually motivated, yet many attempted abductions are not reported to police.
However, offences by strangers are still quite rare - with the NSPCC pointing out that more than 90% of child sexual abuse is perpetrated by someone known to the child."
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37504781In the McCann case we have a child gone missing, we don't know if she was abducted, sexually abused, or murdered or anything really, so which study covers this type of missing child case?
Figures on sexual abuse, or on abductions don't really help. Do we need the stats as it applies to Portugal since it happened there?