A Simple Question.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Don’t be silly sir. Imagine if the investigation came to nothing.

And...?

[faithlilly]

And...?

21 posts and over half directed at me. Old habits eh 

[Vertigo Swirl]

21 posts and over half directed at me. Old habits eh 

What is the meaning of this post?  Can you not answer my question, alternatively if you cannot then simply choose not to respond forthwith. 

[faithlilly]

What is the meaning of this post?  Can you not answer my question, alternatively if you cannot then simply choose not to respond forthwith.

Then I won’t 

[kizzy]

And...?

And what, lol

[Carana]

Jeez Carana are you one of they/them ?

Lol. Do you disagree with what I said?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Then I won’t 

Fine.  I will simply reiterate that in my opinion there is no reason legal or otherwise why the media (and especially the Portuguese / American / Australian media) would sit on information that proved the McCanns were being investigated again as part of Operation Grange.

[jassi]

Fine.  I will simply reiterate that in my opinion there is no reason legal or otherwise why the media (and especially the Portuguese / American / Australian media) would sit on information that proved the McCanns were being investigated again as part of Operation Grange.

So is that a YES then ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

So is that a YES then ?

I have already answered the question if you read back.

[faithlilly]

Fine.  I will simply reiterate that in my opinion there is no reason legal or otherwise why the media (and especially the Portuguese / American / Australian media) would sit on information that proved the McCanns were being investigated again as part of Operation Grange.

That is your perogative.

Just muse on what has happened to the BBC over the Cliff Richard debacle. No charge, a huge libel payout.

[G-Unit]

Fine.  I will simply reiterate that in my opinion there is no reason legal or otherwise why the media (and especially the Portuguese / American / Australian media) would sit on information that proved the McCanns were being investigated again as part of Operation Grange.

Reiterate? Isn't that the first time I've seen 'proof' mentioned?

[Vertigo Swirl]

That is your perogative.

Just muse on what has happened to the BBC over the Cliff Richard debacle. No charge, a huge libel payout.

That's as maybe.  Cliff isn't the first and he won't be the last person whose name has been cited in the press as being investigated for crimes and misdemeanors, and then subsequently not charged.  Let us not forget - in 2007 exactly the same thing happened to the McCanns themselves!  Did they sue any media outlet simply for reporting the fact that they were being investigated?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Reiterate? Isn't that the first time I've seen 'proof' mentioned?

I'm sorry, I don't understand your point.

[faithlilly]

That's as maybe.  Cliff isn't the first and he won't be the last person whose name has been cited in the press as being investigated for crimes and misdemeanors, and then subsequently not charged.  Let us not forget - in 2007 exactly the same thing happened to the McCanns themselves!  Did they sue any media outlet simply for reporting the fact that they were being investigated?

They threatened to sue a Portuguese newspaper was stated just that. As far as I remember no British newspaper reported the McCanns were being investigated until it was clear they were going to be made arguidos

[G-Unit]

I'm sorry, I don't understand your point.

If you're saying something for the first time you're not reiterating it. I do apologise if you mentioned 'proof' before, but I can't see it.